hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Mike Harper vs. Steve Kuberski: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Steve Kuberski ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#2131Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1402Leads
-1.7LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.9
-2.8Average box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.8
#183Best league finish#133Leads
-11 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-132 pts
123Games568Leads

Career Impact Rank places Steve Kuberski #1402 and Mike Harper #2131. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Mike Harper had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/mike-harper/steve-kuberski/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedMike Harper231.293 · No. 2,131Steve Kuberski140.420 · No. 1,402

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Mike Harper

231.293 composite · No. 2,131 all-time

Mike Harper's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1831981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2351980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 253223.66750%111.833
Best 5No. 1831981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2351980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 253235.40030%70.620
Best 10No. 1831981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2351980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate8 open slots × No. 253244.20020%48.840

111.833 + 70.620 + 48.840= 231.293

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 253, this player's stored replacement finish.

Steve Kuberski

140.420 composite · No. 1,402 all-time

Steve Kuberski's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1331969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1331971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1361970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate134.00050%67.000
Best 5No. 1331969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1331971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1361970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1391975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1501972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate138.20030%41.460
Best 10No. 1331969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1331971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1361970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1391975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1501972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1661974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1701973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2191976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 176159.80020%31.960

67.000 + 41.460 + 31.960= 140.420

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 176, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Mike Harper and Steve Kuberski
MetricMike HarperSteve Kuberski
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2131#1402Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better223.7134.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better235.4138.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better244.2159.8Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Mike Harper and Steve Kuberski
MetricMike HarperSteve Kuberski
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#2849Better result for this metric.#4618
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.7Better result for this metric.-1.9
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable-2.1
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable-2.4
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-11 ptsBetter result for this metric.-132 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Mike Harper and Steve Kuberski
MetricMike HarperSteve Kuberski
Games123568
Minutes1,8947,897

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Mike Harper and Steve Kuberski
MetricMike HarperSteve Kuberski
True shooting percentage50.2%Better result for this metric.46.4%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile48.1%Better result for this metric.46.6%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Mike Harper and Steve Kuberski
MetricMike HarperSteve Kuberski
Field-goal percentage47.4%Better result for this metric.41.7%
Three-point percentage0.0%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage55.9%76.7%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Mike Harper and Steve Kuberski
MetricMike HarperSteve Kuberski
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile4.7%5.8%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game0.60.6
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Mike Harper and Steve Kuberski
MetricMike HarperSteve Kuberski
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.5%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Mike Harper and Steve Kuberski
MetricMike HarperSteve Kuberski
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.1%12.3%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game3.53.8Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Mike Harper and Steve Kuberski
MetricMike HarperSteve Kuberski
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.0%Better result for this metric.0.6%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Mike Harper and Steve Kuberski
MetricMike HarperSteve Kuberski
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.8%Better result for this metric.0.4%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Mike Harper and Steve Kuberski
MetricMike HarperSteve Kuberski
Points per game5.05.5Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Steve Kuberski ranks higher in career impact.

Mike HarperMetricSteve Kuberski
#2131Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1402Leads
-1.7LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.9
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.4
-11 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-132 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Mike HarperMetricSteve Kuberski
87Listed-team regular-season wins732Leads
53.0%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.5%
050-win team seasons8Leads
060-win team seasons8Leads
1Playoff team seasons6Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Steve Kuberski leads every available measure below.

Mike HarperMetricSteve Kuberski
1Playoff appearances4Leads
1Playoff games50Leads
1Team playoff wins36Leads
0Finals appearances2Leads
0Championships2Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Mike HarperMetricSteve Kuberski
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Mike HarperSteve KuberskiPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.