hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Neil Johnston vs. Yao Ming: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Neil Johnston ranks higher in career impact

Illustrated portrait of NBA player Yao Ming

Yao Ming

2002–03 to 2010–11 · 8 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#65LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#308
+3.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.4Leads
+3.4Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.0Leads
3.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better16.0
+1,924 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,525 pts
5LeadsTop-10 impact seasons0

Career Impact Rank places Neil Johnston #65 and Yao Ming #308. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Yao Ming had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/neil-johnston/yao-ming/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedNeil Johnston9.607 · No. 65Yao Ming38.860 · No. 308

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Neil Johnston

9.607 composite · No. 65 all-time

Neil Johnston's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 31953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 41954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3.33350%1.667
Best 5No. 31953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 41954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4.20030%1.260
Best 10No. 31953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 41954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 8133.40020%6.680

1.667 + 1.260 + 6.680= 9.607

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 81, this player's stored replacement finish.

Yao Ming

38.860 composite · No. 308 all-time

Yao Ming's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 112006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 162005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate16.00050%8.000
Best 5No. 112006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 162005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 252008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 362004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate21.80030%6.540
Best 10No. 112006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 162005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 252008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 362004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 532003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 552002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 333121.60020%24.320

8.000 + 6.540 + 24.320= 38.860

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 333, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Neil Johnston and Yao Ming
MetricNeil JohnstonYao Ming
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#65Better result for this metric.#308
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better3.3Better result for this metric.16.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better4.2Better result for this metric.21.8
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better33.4Better result for this metric.121.6
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Neil Johnston and Yao Ming
MetricNeil JohnstonYao Ming
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#197Better result for this metric.#269
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.7+5.4Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.5+4.8Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.4+4.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,924 ptsBetter result for this metric.+1,525 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons4Better result for this metric.0
Top-ten impact seasons5Better result for this metric.0

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Neil Johnston and Yao Ming
MetricNeil JohnstonYao Ming
Games516486
Minutes18,29815,818

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Neil Johnston and Yao Ming
MetricNeil JohnstonYao Ming
True shooting percentage53.4%59.6%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable59.5%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Neil Johnston and Yao Ming
MetricNeil JohnstonYao Ming
Field-goal percentage44.4%52.4%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailable20.0%
Free-throw percentage76.8%83.3%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Neil Johnston and Yao Ming
MetricNeil JohnstonYao Ming
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable9.8%
Assists per game2.5Better result for this metric.1.6
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Neil Johnston and Yao Ming
MetricNeil JohnstonYao Ming
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable14.4%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Neil Johnston and Yao Ming
MetricNeil JohnstonYao Ming
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable16.5%
Rebounds per game11.3Better result for this metric.9.2

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Neil Johnston and Yao Ming
MetricNeil JohnstonYao Ming
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable0.6%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Neil Johnston and Yao Ming
MetricNeil JohnstonYao Ming
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable4.4%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Neil Johnston and Yao Ming
MetricNeil JohnstonYao Ming
Points per game19.4Better result for this metric.19.0

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Neil Johnston ranks higher in career impact.

Neil JohnstonMetricYao Ming
#65LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#308
+3.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.4Leads
+3.4Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.0Leads
+1,924 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,525 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Yao Ming leads every available measure below.

Neil JohnstonMetricYao Ming
258Listed-team regular-season wins376Leads
45.5%Listed-team winning percentage57.3%Leads
050-win team seasons4Leads
060-win team seasons0
4Playoff team seasons5Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Neil JohnstonMetricYao Ming
4Playoff appearances4
23Playoff games28Leads
11Team playoff wins14Leads
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Yao Ming leads every available measure below.

Neil JohnstonMetricYao Ming
6All-Star8Leads
0MVP0
5All-NBA5
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Neil JohnstonYao MingPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.