hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Otis Thorpe vs. Paul Silas: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Paul Silas ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#561Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#212Leads
+1.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.8Leads
+1.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.6Leads
50.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better21.3Leads
+1,577 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,802 ptsLeads
89.0Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better43.7Leads

Career Impact Rank places Paul Silas #212 and Otis Thorpe #561. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/otis-thorpe/paul-silas/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedOtis Thorpe60.980 · No. 561Paul Silas28.167 · No. 212

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Otis Thorpe

60.980 composite · No. 561 all-time

Otis Thorpe's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 361987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate50.00050%25.000
Best 5No. 361987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 711990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 821988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate60.60030%18.180
Best 10No. 361987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 711990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 821988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 821991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 921993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1351994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1381985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1401998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate89.00020%17.800

25.000 + 18.180 + 17.800= 60.980

Paul Silas

28.167 composite · No. 212 all-time

Paul Silas's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 151972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate21.33350%10.667
Best 5No. 151972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate29.20030%8.760
Best 10No. 151972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 681966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate43.70020%8.740

10.667 + 8.760 + 8.740= 28.167

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Otis Thorpe and Paul Silas
MetricOtis ThorpePaul Silas
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#561#212Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better50.021.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better60.629.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better89.043.7Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Otis Thorpe and Paul Silas
MetricOtis ThorpePaul Silas
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#258#215Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.6+2.8Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3+2.1Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1+1.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5+0.8Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,577 pts+1,802 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Otis Thorpe and Paul Silas
MetricOtis ThorpePaul Silas
Games1,2571,254
Minutes39,82234,989

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Otis Thorpe and Paul Silas
MetricOtis ThorpePaul Silas
True shooting percentage58.4%Better result for this metric.48.9%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile58.8%Better result for this metric.49.9%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Otis Thorpe and Paul Silas
MetricOtis ThorpePaul Silas
Field-goal percentage54.6%Better result for this metric.43.2%
Three-point percentage4.7%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage68.7%Better result for this metric.67.3%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Otis Thorpe and Paul Silas
MetricOtis ThorpePaul Silas
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.8%Better result for this metric.10.3%
Assists per game2.2Better result for this metric.2.1
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Otis Thorpe and Paul Silas
MetricOtis ThorpePaul Silas
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile15.2%Better result for this metric.21.8%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Otis Thorpe and Paul Silas
MetricOtis ThorpePaul Silas
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.6%17.0%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game8.29.9Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Otis Thorpe and Paul Silas
MetricOtis ThorpePaul Silas
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.1%1.1%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Otis Thorpe and Paul Silas
MetricOtis ThorpePaul Silas
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.7%Better result for this metric.0.4%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Otis Thorpe and Paul Silas
MetricOtis ThorpePaul Silas
Points per game14.0Better result for this metric.9.4

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Paul Silas ranks higher in career impact.

Otis ThorpeMetricPaul Silas
#561Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#212Leads
+1.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.8Leads
+1.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.6Leads
+1,577 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,802 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Otis ThorpeMetricPaul Silas
767Listed-team regular-season wins1,184Leads
50.3%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.5%
550-win team seasons15Leads
060-win team seasons12Leads
12Playoff team seasons14Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Paul Silas leads every available measure below.

Otis ThorpeMetricPaul Silas
11Playoff appearances14Leads
78Playoff games163Leads
37Team playoff wins93Leads
1Finals appearances4Leads
1Championships3Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Paul Silas leads every available measure below.

Otis ThorpeMetricPaul Silas
1All-Star2Leads
0MVP0
0All-NBA0
0All-Defense5Leads
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Otis ThorpePaul SilasPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.