hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Otis Thorpe vs. Zach Randolph: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Otis Thorpe ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#561LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#696
+1.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.4Leads
+1.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3Leads
50.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better61.0
+1,577 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,489 pts
89.0LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better99.2

Career Impact Rank places Otis Thorpe #561 and Zach Randolph #696. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Zach Randolph had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/otis-thorpe/zach-randolph/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedOtis Thorpe60.980 · No. 561Zach Randolph71.880 · No. 696

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Otis Thorpe

60.980 composite · No. 561 all-time

Otis Thorpe's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 361987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate50.00050%25.000
Best 5No. 361987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 711990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 821988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate60.60030%18.180
Best 10No. 361987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 711990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 821988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 821991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 921993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1351994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1381985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1401998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate89.00020%17.800

25.000 + 18.180 + 17.800= 60.980

Zach Randolph

71.880 composite · No. 696 all-time

Zach Randolph's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 392010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 682006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 762008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate61.00050%30.500
Best 5No. 392010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 682006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 762008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 842009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 922014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate71.80030%21.540
Best 10No. 392010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 682006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 762008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 842009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 922014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1112002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1252011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1302003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1302017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1372015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate99.20020%19.840

30.500 + 21.540 + 19.840= 71.880

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Otis Thorpe and Zach Randolph
MetricOtis ThorpeZach Randolph
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#561Better result for this metric.#696
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better50.0Better result for this metric.61.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better60.6Better result for this metric.71.8
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better89.0Better result for this metric.99.2
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Otis Thorpe and Zach Randolph
MetricOtis ThorpeZach Randolph
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#258Better result for this metric.#286
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.6+2.4Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3+1.6Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1+1.3Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5+0.8Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,577 ptsBetter result for this metric.+1,489 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Otis Thorpe and Zach Randolph
MetricOtis ThorpeZach Randolph
Games1,2571,116
Minutes39,82234,616

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Otis Thorpe and Zach Randolph
MetricOtis ThorpeZach Randolph
True shooting percentage58.4%Better result for this metric.52.2%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile58.8%Better result for this metric.53.3%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Otis Thorpe and Zach Randolph
MetricOtis ThorpeZach Randolph
Field-goal percentage54.6%Better result for this metric.47.1%
Three-point percentage4.7%27.3%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage68.7%76.4%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Otis Thorpe and Zach Randolph
MetricOtis ThorpeZach Randolph
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.8%10.9%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game2.2Better result for this metric.1.8
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Otis Thorpe and Zach Randolph
MetricOtis ThorpeZach Randolph
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile15.2%11.5%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Otis Thorpe and Zach Randolph
MetricOtis ThorpeZach Randolph
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.6%17.3%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game8.29.1Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Otis Thorpe and Zach Randolph
MetricOtis ThorpeZach Randolph
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.1%1.4%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Otis Thorpe and Zach Randolph
MetricOtis ThorpeZach Randolph
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.7%0.7%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Otis Thorpe and Zach Randolph
MetricOtis ThorpeZach Randolph
Points per game14.016.6Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Otis Thorpe ranks higher in career impact.

Otis ThorpeMetricZach Randolph
#561LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#696
+1.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.4Leads
+1.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3Leads
+1,577 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,489 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Otis Thorpe leads every available measure below.

Otis ThorpeMetricZach Randolph
767LeadsListed-team regular-season wins694
50.3%LeadsListed-team winning percentage47.5%
5Leads50-win team seasons4
060-win team seasons0
12LeadsPlayoff team seasons9

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Otis Thorpe leads every available measure below.

Otis ThorpeMetricZach Randolph
11LeadsPlayoff appearances9
78LeadsPlayoff games70
37LeadsTeam playoff wins32
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Zach Randolph leads every available measure below.

Otis ThorpeMetricZach Randolph
1All-Star2Leads
0MVP0
0All-NBA1Leads
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Otis ThorpeZach RandolphPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.