hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Otto Porter Jr. vs. Pascal Siakam: 2016–17 season

hussEyquation2016–17 season · regular-season impact
Regular-season verdict

Otto Porter Jr. leads in impact for 2016–17

Otto Porter Jr. ranks ahead of Pascal Siakam in estimated impact while playing. This compares regular-season performance, not total contribution across the season.

Impact comparison

Impact estimate is measured in points per 100 possessions above league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Impact Rate rank is a league place, not a 0–100 score: No. 1 is best.

+2.9LeadsImpact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.8
#38LeadsImpact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#302
80Games55
2,605Minutes859
13.4LeadsPPG4.2
62.8%LeadsTS%52.3%

Otto Porter Jr.'s estimated impact per 100 possessions was +2.9, compared with -2.8 for Pascal Siakam. This compares their impact while playing, not their total contribution across the season. Both players are compared in the 2016–17 season using its published Impact Rate. A ranked comparison requires at least 450 minutes for each player.

Otto Porter Jr.: 80 games and 2,605 minutes. Pascal Siakam: 55 games and 859 minutes. Playing time matters when judging the whole season; the impact estimate above is a rate, not a season total.

Read turnover rate alongside offensive workload. Offensive usage measures the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on the court—not every touch, pass, or act of playmaking. These rows provide context; they are not extra points added to the ranking.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

2016–17 season · regular-season impacthusseyquation.com/compare/otto-porter-jr/pascal-siakam/2016-17

Behind the estimate

Why the model rates them this way

A verified breakdown of this season’s published estimate is unavailable. We do not substitute another season’s calculation.

What this does not establish: these figures do not prove that either player made his teammates shoot better. A verified teammate-shooting comparison is unavailable for this selected season. A small difference in the estimates is not a decisive basketball distinction.

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · 2016–17 season

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

The impact estimate compares performance while playing, not total contribution over the season. The individual-stat estimate plus the lineup adjustment gives the final estimate.

Impact: Otto Porter Jr. and Pascal Siakam
MetricOtto Porter Jr.Pascal Siakam
Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.9Better result for this metric.-2.8
Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#38Better result for this metric.#302

Otto Porter Jr.: verified lineup window unavailable. Pascal Siakam: verified lineup window unavailable. The adjustment is not necessarily based on this season alone.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Otto Porter Jr. and Pascal Siakam
MetricOtto Porter Jr.Pascal Siakam
Games8055
Minutes2,605859

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These figures describe the selected regular seasons. They provide context, not extra points added to the verdict. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Otto Porter Jr. and Pascal Siakam
MetricOtto Porter Jr.Pascal Siakam
True shooting percentage62.8%Better result for this metric.52.3%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Otto Porter Jr. and Pascal Siakam
MetricOtto Porter Jr.Pascal Siakam
Field-goal percentage51.6%Better result for this metric.50.2%
Three-point percentage43.4%Better result for this metric.14.3%
Free-throw percentage83.2%Better result for this metric.68.8%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Otto Porter Jr. and Pascal Siakam
MetricOtto Porter Jr.Pascal Siakam
Assists per game1.5Better result for this metric.0.3

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Otto Porter Jr. and Pascal Siakam
MetricOtto Porter Jr.Pascal Siakam
Rebounds per game6.4Better result for this metric.3.4

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Otto Porter Jr. and Pascal Siakam
MetricOtto Porter Jr.Pascal Siakam
Points per game13.4Better result for this metric.4.2

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Otto Porter Jr. leads in impact for 2016–17.

Otto Porter Jr.MetricPascal Siakam
+2.9LeadsImpact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.8
#38LeadsImpact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#302

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Pascal Siakam leads every available measure below.

Otto Porter Jr.MetricPascal Siakam
470Listed-team regular-season wins478Leads
45.7%Listed-team winning percentage54.2%Leads
150-win team seasons5Leads
060-win team seasons0
5Playoff team seasons7Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Pascal Siakam leads every available measure below.

Otto Porter Jr.MetricPascal Siakam
5Playoff appearances7Leads
50Playoff games93Leads
37Team playoff wins56Leads
1Finals appearances2Leads
1Championships1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Otto Porter Jr.MetricPascal Siakam
Not availableAll-Star4
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA2
Not availableAll-Defense0
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Selected seasons

Box impact

Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.

Otto Porter Jr.Pascal Siakam

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

1
Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.