hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Pero Antić vs. Vítor Luiz Faverani: 2013–14 season

hussEyquation2013–14 season · regular-season impact
Regular-season verdict

Pero Antić leads in impact for 2013–14

Pero Antić ranks ahead of Vítor Luiz Faverani in estimated impact while playing. This compares regular-season performance, not total contribution across the season.

Impact comparison

Impact estimate is measured in points per 100 possessions above league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Impact Rate rank is a league place, not a 0–100 score: No. 1 is best.

-2.1LeadsImpact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-3.4
#274LeadsImpact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#314
50Games37
925Minutes488
7.0LeadsPPG4.4
54.5%LeadsTS%50.2%

Pero Antić's estimated impact per 100 possessions was -2.1, compared with -3.4 for Vítor Luiz Faverani. This compares their impact while playing, not their total contribution across the season. Both players are compared in the 2013–14 season using its published Impact Rate. A ranked comparison requires at least 450 minutes for each player.

Pero Antić: 50 games and 925 minutes. Vítor Luiz Faverani: 37 games and 488 minutes. Playing time matters when judging the whole season; the impact estimate above is a rate, not a season total.

Read turnover rate alongside offensive workload. Offensive usage measures the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on the court—not every touch, pass, or act of playmaking. These rows provide context; they are not extra points added to the ranking.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

2013–14 season · regular-season impacthusseyquation.com/compare/pero-antic/vitor-luiz-faverani/2013-14

Behind the estimate

Why the model rates them this way

A verified breakdown of this season’s published estimate is unavailable. We do not substitute another season’s calculation.

What this does not establish: these figures do not prove that either player made his teammates shoot better. A verified teammate-shooting comparison is unavailable for this selected season. A small difference in the estimates is not a decisive basketball distinction.

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · 2013–14 season

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

The impact estimate compares performance while playing, not total contribution over the season. The individual-stat estimate plus the lineup adjustment gives the final estimate.

Impact: Pero Antić and Vítor Luiz Faverani
MetricPero AntićVítor Luiz Faverani
Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.1Better result for this metric.-3.4
Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#274Better result for this metric.#314

Pero Antić: verified lineup window unavailable. Vítor Luiz Faverani: verified lineup window unavailable. The adjustment is not necessarily based on this season alone.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Pero Antić and Vítor Luiz Faverani
MetricPero AntićVítor Luiz Faverani
Games5037
Minutes925488

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These figures describe the selected regular seasons. They provide context, not extra points added to the verdict. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Pero Antić and Vítor Luiz Faverani
MetricPero AntićVítor Luiz Faverani
True shooting percentage54.5%Better result for this metric.50.2%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Pero Antić and Vítor Luiz Faverani
MetricPero AntićVítor Luiz Faverani
Field-goal percentage41.8%43.5%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage32.7%Better result for this metric.30.0%
Free-throw percentage75.8%Better result for this metric.64.9%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Pero Antić and Vítor Luiz Faverani
MetricPero AntićVítor Luiz Faverani
Assists per game1.2Better result for this metric.0.4

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Pero Antić and Vítor Luiz Faverani
MetricPero AntićVítor Luiz Faverani
Rebounds per game4.2Better result for this metric.3.5

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Pero Antić and Vítor Luiz Faverani
MetricPero AntićVítor Luiz Faverani
Points per game7.0Better result for this metric.4.4

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Pero Antić leads in impact for 2013–14.

Pero AntićMetricVítor Luiz Faverani
-2.1LeadsImpact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-3.4
#274LeadsImpact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#314

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Pero Antić leads every available measure below.

Pero AntićMetricVítor Luiz Faverani
98LeadsListed-team regular-season wins25
59.8%LeadsListed-team winning percentage30.5%
1Leads50-win team seasons0
1Leads60-win team seasons0
2LeadsPlayoff team seasons0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Pero AntićMetricVítor Luiz Faverani
2Playoff appearancesNot available
22Playoff gamesNot available
11Team playoff winsNot available
0Finals appearancesNot available
0ChampionshipsNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Pero AntićMetricVítor Luiz Faverani
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Selected seasons

Box impact

Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.

Pero AntićVítor Luiz Faverani

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

1

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.