hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Pete Maravich vs. Rudy Tomjanovich: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Pete Maravich ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#350LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#367
+1.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.2
+1,201 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,286 ptsLeads
88.0Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better83.4Leads
+2.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7
28.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better28.3

Career Impact Rank places Pete Maravich #350 and Rudy Tomjanovich #367. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Rudy Tomjanovich had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/pete-maravich/rudy-tomjanovich/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedPete Maravich42.687 · No. 350Rudy Tomjanovich44.227 · No. 367

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Pete Maravich

42.687 composite · No. 350 all-time

Pete Maravich's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 171975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate28.33350%14.167
Best 5No. 171975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 361974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate36.40030%10.920
Best 10No. 171975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 361974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 951971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1261970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1921978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2201979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate88.00020%17.600

14.167 + 10.920 + 17.600= 42.687

Rudy Tomjanovich

44.227 composite · No. 367 all-time

Rudy Tomjanovich's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 111973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate28.33350%14.167
Best 5No. 111973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 821975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate44.60030%13.380
Best 10No. 111973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 821975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 871976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1111970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1121977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1371978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1641979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate83.40020%16.680

14.167 + 13.380 + 16.680= 44.227

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Pete Maravich and Rudy Tomjanovich
MetricPete MaravichRudy Tomjanovich
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#350Better result for this metric.#367
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better28.328.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better36.4Better result for this metric.44.6
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better88.083.4Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Pete Maravich and Rudy Tomjanovich
MetricPete MaravichRudy Tomjanovich
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#375#343Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7+2.7
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.9Better result for this metric.+1.8
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5Better result for this metric.+1.2
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.2+0.1Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,201 pts+1,286 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Pete Maravich and Rudy Tomjanovich
MetricPete MaravichRudy Tomjanovich
Games658768
Minutes24,31625,714

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Pete Maravich and Rudy Tomjanovich
MetricPete MaravichRudy Tomjanovich
True shooting percentage50.0%53.9%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile50.0%52.9%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Pete Maravich and Rudy Tomjanovich
MetricPete MaravichRudy Tomjanovich
Field-goal percentage44.1%50.1%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage66.7%Better result for this metric.26.2%
Free-throw percentage82.0%Better result for this metric.78.4%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Pete Maravich and Rudy Tomjanovich
MetricPete MaravichRudy Tomjanovich
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile22.6%Better result for this metric.8.6%
Assists per game5.4Better result for this metric.2.0
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Pete Maravich and Rudy Tomjanovich
MetricPete MaravichRudy Tomjanovich
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.1%9.1%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Pete Maravich and Rudy Tomjanovich
MetricPete MaravichRudy Tomjanovich
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.4%12.4%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game4.28.1Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Pete Maravich and Rudy Tomjanovich
MetricPete MaravichRudy Tomjanovich
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.6%Better result for this metric.0.9%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Pete Maravich and Rudy Tomjanovich
MetricPete MaravichRudy Tomjanovich
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.4%0.5%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Pete Maravich and Rudy Tomjanovich
MetricPete MaravichRudy Tomjanovich
Points per game24.2Better result for this metric.17.4

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Pete Maravich ranks higher in career impact.

Pete MaravichMetricRudy Tomjanovich
#350LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#367
+2.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7
+1.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.2
+1,201 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,286 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Pete MaravichMetricRudy Tomjanovich
677Listed-team regular-season wins697Leads
0.6%Listed-team winning percentage0.6%
7Leads50-win team seasons6
7Leads60-win team seasons6
4Playoff team seasons5Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Rudy Tomjanovich leads every available measure below.

Pete MaravichMetricRudy Tomjanovich
4Playoff appearances5Leads
26Playoff games37Leads
10Team playoff wins23Leads
0Finals appearances1Leads
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Pete Maravich leads every available measure below.

Pete MaravichMetricRudy Tomjanovich
5All-Star5
0MVP0
4LeadsAll-NBA0
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Pete MaravichRudy TomjanovichPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.