hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Pete Maravich vs. Sidney Wicks: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Pete Maravich ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#350LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#366
+2.7LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.1
+1.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3
28.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better25.3Leads
+1,201 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,168 pts
88.0LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better106.1

Career Impact Rank places Pete Maravich #350 and Sidney Wicks #366. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/pete-maravich/sidney-wicks/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedPete Maravich42.687 · No. 350Sidney Wicks44.207 · No. 366

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Pete Maravich

42.687 composite · No. 350 all-time

Pete Maravich's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 171975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate28.33350%14.167
Best 5No. 171975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 361974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate36.40030%10.920
Best 10No. 171975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 361974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 951971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1261970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1921978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2201979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate88.00020%17.600

14.167 + 10.920 + 17.600= 42.687

Sidney Wicks

44.207 composite · No. 366 all-time

Sidney Wicks's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 211974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate25.33350%12.667
Best 5No. 211974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 391971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 571975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate34.40030%10.320
Best 10No. 211974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 391971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 571975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1081976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1541977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2041980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2051979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2181978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate106.10020%21.220

12.667 + 10.320 + 21.220= 44.207

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Pete Maravich and Sidney Wicks
MetricPete MaravichSidney Wicks
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#350Better result for this metric.#366
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better28.325.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better36.434.4Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better88.0Better result for this metric.106.1
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Pete Maravich and Sidney Wicks
MetricPete MaravichSidney Wicks
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#375Better result for this metric.#391
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7Better result for this metric.+2.1
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.9Better result for this metric.+1.7
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5Better result for this metric.+1.3
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.2Better result for this metric.-0.4
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,201 ptsBetter result for this metric.+1,168 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Pete Maravich and Sidney Wicks
MetricPete MaravichSidney Wicks
Games658760
Minutes24,31625,762

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Pete Maravich and Sidney Wicks
MetricPete MaravichSidney Wicks
True shooting percentage50.0%50.2%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile50.0%Better result for this metric.49.7%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Pete Maravich and Sidney Wicks
MetricPete MaravichSidney Wicks
Field-goal percentage44.1%45.9%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage66.7%Better result for this metric.0.0%
Free-throw percentage82.0%Better result for this metric.68.5%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Pete Maravich and Sidney Wicks
MetricPete MaravichSidney Wicks
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile22.6%Better result for this metric.13.4%
Assists per game5.4Better result for this metric.3.2
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Pete Maravich and Sidney Wicks
MetricPete MaravichSidney Wicks
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.1%Better result for this metric.20.1%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Pete Maravich and Sidney Wicks
MetricPete MaravichSidney Wicks
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.4%12.8%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game4.28.7Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Pete Maravich and Sidney Wicks
MetricPete MaravichSidney Wicks
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.6%Better result for this metric.1.4%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Pete Maravich and Sidney Wicks
MetricPete MaravichSidney Wicks
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.4%1.2%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Pete Maravich and Sidney Wicks
MetricPete MaravichSidney Wicks
Points per game24.2Better result for this metric.16.8

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Pete Maravich ranks higher in career impact.

Pete MaravichMetricSidney Wicks
#350LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#366
+2.7LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.1
+1.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3
+1,201 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,168 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Pete Maravich leads every available measure below.

Pete MaravichMetricSidney Wicks
677LeadsListed-team regular-season wins600
0.6%Listed-team winning percentage0.6%
7Leads50-win team seasons5
7Leads60-win team seasons5
4LeadsPlayoff team seasons1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Pete Maravich leads every available measure below.

Pete MaravichMetricSidney Wicks
4LeadsPlayoff appearances1
26LeadsPlayoff games9
10LeadsTeam playoff wins5
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Pete MaravichMetricSidney Wicks
5LeadsAll-Star4
0MVP0
4LeadsAll-NBA0
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Pete MaravichSidney WicksPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.