hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Randy Smith vs. Spencer Haywood: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Spencer Haywood ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#438Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#299Leads
+1.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.8Leads
+1.0Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3Leads
43.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better19.0Leads
+1,526 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,233 pts
0Top-10 impact seasons1Leads

Career Impact Rank places Spencer Haywood #299 and Randy Smith #438. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Randy Smith had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/randy-smith/spencer-haywood/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedRandy Smith51.007 · No. 438Spencer Haywood37.760 · No. 299

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Randy Smith

51.007 composite · No. 438 all-time

Randy Smith's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 381975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate43.33350%21.667
Best 5No. 381975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 531972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate49.60030%14.880
Best 10No. 381975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 531972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 661971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 771974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1251979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1341978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate72.30020%14.460

21.667 + 14.880 + 14.460= 51.007

Spencer Haywood

37.760 composite · No. 299 all-time

Spencer Haywood's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 101973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate19.00050%9.500
Best 5No. 101973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 501971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 851970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate38.40030%11.520
Best 10No. 101973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 501971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 851970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 901975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1021978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1241977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1391976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1901981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate83.70020%16.740

9.500 + 11.520 + 16.740= 37.760

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Randy Smith and Spencer Haywood
MetricRandy SmithSpencer Haywood
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#438#299Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better43.319.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better49.638.4Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better72.3Better result for this metric.83.7
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Randy Smith and Spencer Haywood
MetricRandy SmithSpencer Haywood
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#268Better result for this metric.#364
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5+2.8Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3+2.1Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.0+1.3Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.4Better result for this metric.+0.1
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,526 ptsBetter result for this metric.+1,233 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons01Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Randy Smith and Spencer Haywood
MetricRandy SmithSpencer Haywood
Games976760
Minutes31,44425,600

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Randy Smith and Spencer Haywood
MetricRandy SmithSpencer Haywood
True shooting percentage51.3%51.7%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile51.2%51.6%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Randy Smith and Spencer Haywood
MetricRandy SmithSpencer Haywood
Field-goal percentage47.0%Better result for this metric.46.5%
Three-point percentage15.5%Better result for this metric.12.5%
Free-throw percentage78.1%80.0%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Randy Smith and Spencer Haywood
MetricRandy SmithSpencer Haywood
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile20.9%Better result for this metric.7.7%
Assists per game4.6Better result for this metric.1.8
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Randy Smith and Spencer Haywood
MetricRandy SmithSpencer Haywood
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.1%Better result for this metric.13.7%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Randy Smith and Spencer Haywood
MetricRandy SmithSpencer Haywood
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.1%13.8%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game3.79.3Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Randy Smith and Spencer Haywood
MetricRandy SmithSpencer Haywood
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.4%Better result for this metric.0.9%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Randy Smith and Spencer Haywood
MetricRandy SmithSpencer Haywood
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.1%1.8%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Randy Smith and Spencer Haywood
MetricRandy SmithSpencer Haywood
Points per game16.719.2Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Spencer Haywood ranks higher in career impact.

Randy SmithMetricSpencer Haywood
#438Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#299Leads
+1.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.8Leads
+1.0Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3Leads
+1,526 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,233 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Randy SmithMetricSpencer Haywood
676Listed-team regular-season wins777Leads
0.7%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.6%
550-win team seasons7Leads
560-win team seasons7Leads
4Playoff team seasons4

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Spencer Haywood leads every available measure below.

Randy SmithMetricSpencer Haywood
4Playoff appearances4
24Playoff games33Leads
10Team playoff wins21Leads
0Finals appearances1Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Spencer Haywood leads every available measure below.

Randy SmithMetricSpencer Haywood
2All-Star4Leads
0MVP0
1All-NBA4Leads
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Randy SmithSpencer HaywoodPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.