hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Ray Felix vs. Slater Martin: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Slater Martin ranks higher in career impact

Ray Felix

1953–54 to 1961–62 · 9 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#418Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#377Leads
-0.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.4Leads
-1.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.4Leads
42.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better42.7
+48 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+438 ptsLeads
63.0Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better52.7Leads

Career Impact Rank places Slater Martin #377 and Ray Felix #418. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/ray-felix/slater-martin/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedRay Felix49.307 · No. 418Slater Martin45.433 · No. 377

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Ray Felix

49.307 composite · No. 418 all-time

Ray Felix's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 381953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 421957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate42.33350%21.167
Best 5No. 381953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 421957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate51.80030%15.540
Best 10No. 381953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 421957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 781958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 8163.00020%12.600

21.167 + 15.540 + 12.600= 49.307

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 81, this player's stored replacement finish.

Slater Martin

45.433 composite · No. 377 all-time

Slater Martin's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 401950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 431955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate42.66750%21.333
Best 5No. 401950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 431955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 501956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate45.20030%13.560
Best 10No. 401950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 431955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 501956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 631959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate52.70020%10.540

21.333 + 13.560 + 10.540= 45.433

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Ray Felix and Slater Martin
MetricRay FelixSlater Martin
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#418#377Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better42.3Better result for this metric.42.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better51.845.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better63.052.7Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Ray Felix and Slater Martin
MetricRay FelixSlater Martin
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1637#846Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1+0.4Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.6-0.2Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.1-0.4Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable-1.1
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+48 pts+438 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Ray Felix and Slater Martin
MetricRay FelixSlater Martin
Games637678
Minutes15,18723,741

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Ray Felix and Slater Martin
MetricRay FelixSlater Martin
True shooting percentage48.1%Better result for this metric.43.7%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile44.4%Better result for this metric.44.0%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Ray Felix and Slater Martin
MetricRay FelixSlater Martin
Field-goal percentage41.2%Better result for this metric.36.5%
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage67.8%76.7%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Ray Felix and Slater Martin
MetricRay FelixSlater Martin
Assists per game0.74.4Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Ray Felix and Slater Martin
MetricRay FelixSlater Martin
Rebounds per game8.9Better result for this metric.3.4

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Ray Felix and Slater Martin
MetricRay FelixSlater Martin
Points per game10.9Better result for this metric.10.4

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Slater Martin ranks higher in career impact.

Ray FelixMetricSlater Martin
#418Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#377Leads
-0.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.4Leads
-1.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.4Leads
+48 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+438 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Ray FelixMetricSlater Martin
342Listed-team regular-season wins457Leads
46.2%Listed-team winning percentage58.4%Leads
1Leads50-win team seasons0
060-win team seasons0
6Playoff team seasons10Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Slater Martin leads every available measure below.

Ray FelixMetricSlater Martin
5Playoff appearances10Leads
38Playoff games80Leads
19Team playoff wins57Leads
1Finals appearances6Leads
0Championships4Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Ray FelixMetricSlater Martin
1All-Star7Leads
0MVP0
0All-NBA5Leads
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
1LeadsRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Ray FelixSlater MartinPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.