hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Ray Williams vs. Victor Oladipo: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Ray Williams ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#227LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#709
+4.2Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+6.0Leads
+3.1LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.2
11.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better31.0
+1,478 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,006 pts
1LeadsTop-10 impact seasons0

Career Impact Rank places Ray Williams #227 and Victor Oladipo #709. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Victor Oladipo had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/ray-williams/victor-oladipo/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedRay Williams29.813 · No. 227Victor Oladipo72.680 · No. 709

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Ray Williams

29.813 composite · No. 227 all-time

Ray Williams's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 61979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate11.66750%5.833
Best 5No. 61979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate21.00030%6.300
Best 10No. 61979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1231977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1451985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1561984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1591982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1961986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate88.40020%17.680

5.833 + 6.300 + 17.680= 29.813

Victor Oladipo

72.680 composite · No. 709 all-time

Victor Oladipo's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 122017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 382018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 432015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate31.00050%15.500
Best 5No. 122017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 382018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 432015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1332014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1602013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate77.20030%23.160
Best 10No. 122017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 382018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 432015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1332014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1602013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1622016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1952020–21No. 2902022–23No. 3032019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 365170.10020%34.020

15.500 + 23.160 + 34.020= 72.680

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 365, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Ray Williams and Victor Oladipo
MetricRay WilliamsVictor Oladipo
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#227Better result for this metric.#709
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better11.7Better result for this metric.31.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better21.0Better result for this metric.77.2
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better88.4Better result for this metric.170.1
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Ray Williams and Victor Oladipo
MetricRay WilliamsVictor Oladipo
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#291Better result for this metric.#455
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.2+6.0Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.8Better result for this metric.+3.7
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.1Better result for this metric.+2.2
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8Unavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,478 ptsBetter result for this metric.+1,006 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons1Better result for this metric.0

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Ray Williams and Victor Oladipo
MetricRay WilliamsVictor Oladipo
Games655504
Minutes18,46216,247

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Ray Williams and Victor Oladipo
MetricRay WilliamsVictor Oladipo
True shooting percentage50.9%53.4%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile50.0%52.6%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Ray Williams and Victor Oladipo
MetricRay WilliamsVictor Oladipo
Field-goal percentage45.1%Better result for this metric.43.6%
Three-point percentage23.7%34.7%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage80.2%Better result for this metric.78.8%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Ray Williams and Victor Oladipo
MetricRay WilliamsVictor Oladipo
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile29.5%Better result for this metric.19.6%
Assists per game5.8Better result for this metric.3.9
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Ray Williams and Victor Oladipo
MetricRay WilliamsVictor Oladipo
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile18.7%13.7%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Ray Williams and Victor Oladipo
MetricRay WilliamsVictor Oladipo
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.9%7.8%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game3.64.5Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Ray Williams and Victor Oladipo
MetricRay WilliamsVictor Oladipo
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile3.0%Better result for this metric.2.4%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Ray Williams and Victor Oladipo
MetricRay WilliamsVictor Oladipo
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.6%1.2%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Ray Williams and Victor Oladipo
MetricRay WilliamsVictor Oladipo
Points per game15.516.9Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Ray Williams ranks higher in career impact.

Ray WilliamsMetricVictor Oladipo
#227LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#709
+4.2Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+6.0Leads
+3.1LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.2
+1,478 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,006 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Ray Williams leads every available measure below.

Ray WilliamsMetricVictor Oladipo
510LeadsListed-team regular-season wins459
51.8%LeadsListed-team winning percentage48.6%
3Leads50-win team seasons1
1Leads60-win team seasons0
8LeadsPlayoff team seasons7

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Ray WilliamsMetricVictor Oladipo
5Playoff appearances5
40LeadsPlayoff games33
21Team playoff wins28Leads
1Finals appearances1
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Ray WilliamsMetricVictor Oladipo
Not availableAll-Star2
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA1
Not availableAll-Defense1
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Ray WilliamsVictor OladipoPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.