hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Ricky Sobers vs. Tom McMillen: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Ricky Sobers ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1083LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1563
+0.7LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5
-0.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.7
89.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better148.7
+392 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-113 pts
137.2LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better187.1

Career Impact Rank places Ricky Sobers #1083 and Tom McMillen #1563. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/ricky-sobers/tom-mcmillen/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedRicky Sobers102.633 · No. 1,083Tom McMillen160.773 · No. 1,563

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Ricky Sobers

102.633 composite · No. 1,083 all-time

Ricky Sobers's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 711976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 911977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1071975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate89.66750%44.833
Best 5No. 711976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 911977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1071975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1111978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1261982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate101.20030%30.360
Best 10No. 711976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 911977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1071975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1111978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1261982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1551980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1571983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1601985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1841979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2101984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate137.20020%27.440

44.833 + 30.360 + 27.440= 102.633

Tom McMillen

160.773 composite · No. 1,563 all-time

Tom McMillen's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1171979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1621981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1671975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate148.66750%74.333
Best 5No. 1171979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1621981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1671975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1791977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1921983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate163.40030%49.020
Best 10No. 1171979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1621981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1671975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1791977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1921983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2021978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2021982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2131984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2171976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2201985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate187.10020%37.420

74.333 + 49.020 + 37.420= 160.773

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Ricky Sobers and Tom McMillen
MetricRicky SobersTom McMillen
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1083Better result for this metric.#1563
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better89.7Better result for this metric.148.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better101.2Better result for this metric.163.4
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better137.2Better result for this metric.187.1
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Ricky Sobers and Tom McMillen
MetricRicky SobersTom McMillen
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#903Better result for this metric.#4567
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.7Better result for this metric.-0.5
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1Better result for this metric.-1.3
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3Better result for this metric.-1.7
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.1Better result for this metric.-2.3
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+392 ptsBetter result for this metric.-113 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Ricky Sobers and Tom McMillen
MetricRicky SobersTom McMillen
Games821729
Minutes22,99214,770

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Ricky Sobers and Tom McMillen
MetricRicky SobersTom McMillen
True shooting percentage52.2%52.8%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile52.2%52.5%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Ricky Sobers and Tom McMillen
MetricRicky SobersTom McMillen
Field-goal percentage45.9%48.3%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage29.1%Better result for this metric.12.0%
Free-throw percentage84.3%Better result for this metric.80.6%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Ricky Sobers and Tom McMillen
MetricRicky SobersTom McMillen
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile22.4%Better result for this metric.8.1%
Assists per game4.3Better result for this metric.1.1
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Ricky Sobers and Tom McMillen
MetricRicky SobersTom McMillen
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.9%12.5%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Ricky Sobers and Tom McMillen
MetricRicky SobersTom McMillen
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.1%10.7%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game2.64.0Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Ricky Sobers and Tom McMillen
MetricRicky SobersTom McMillen
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.2%Better result for this metric.0.6%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Ricky Sobers and Tom McMillen
MetricRicky SobersTom McMillen
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.4%0.7%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Ricky Sobers and Tom McMillen
MetricRicky SobersTom McMillen
Points per game13.3Better result for this metric.8.1

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Ricky Sobers ranks higher in career impact.

Ricky SobersMetricTom McMillen
#1083LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1563
+0.7LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5
-0.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.7
+392 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-113 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Tom McMillen leads every available measure below.

Ricky SobersMetricTom McMillen
433Listed-team regular-season wins519Leads
2.1%Listed-team winning percentage2.5%Leads
150-win team seasons2Leads
160-win team seasons1
3Playoff team seasons9Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Ricky SobersMetricTom McMillen
3Playoff appearances8Leads
29LeadsPlayoff games26
13Team playoff wins14Leads
1LeadsFinals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Ricky SobersMetricTom McMillen
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Ricky SobersTom McMillenPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.