hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Rod Foster vs. Stewart Granger: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Rod Foster ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#2110LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2260
-2.4LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-3.4
-3.6Average box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-3.4Leads
#196LeadsBest league finish#227
-94 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-57 ptsLeads
207LeadsGames80

Career Impact Rank places Rod Foster #2110 and Stewart Granger #2260. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Stewart Granger had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/rod-foster/stewart-granger/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedRod Foster228.853 · No. 2,110Stewart Granger244.327 · No. 2,260

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Rod Foster

228.853 composite · No. 2,110 all-time

Rod Foster's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1961984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2171983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2461985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate219.66750%109.833
Best 5No. 1961984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2171983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2461985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 255233.80030%70.140
Best 10No. 1961984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2171983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2461985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate7 open slots × No. 255244.40020%48.880

109.833 + 70.140 + 48.880= 228.853

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 255, this player's stored replacement finish.

Stewart Granger

244.327 composite · No. 2,260 all-time

Stewart Granger's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 2271983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 250242.33350%121.167
Best 5No. 2271983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 250245.40030%73.620
Best 10No. 2271983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate9 open slots × No. 250247.70020%49.540

121.167 + 73.620 + 49.540= 244.327

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 250, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Rod Foster and Stewart Granger
MetricRod FosterStewart Granger
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2110Better result for this metric.#2260
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better219.7Better result for this metric.242.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better233.8Better result for this metric.245.4
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better244.4Better result for this metric.247.7
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Rod Foster and Stewart Granger
MetricRod FosterStewart Granger
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#4484#4221Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.4Better result for this metric.-3.4
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-3.6Unavailable
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-94 pts-57 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Rod Foster and Stewart Granger
MetricRod FosterStewart Granger
Games20780
Minutes3,446996

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Rod Foster and Stewart Granger
MetricRod FosterStewart Granger
True shooting percentage49.9%Better result for this metric.47.0%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile48.5%48.9%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Rod Foster and Stewart Granger
MetricRod FosterStewart Granger
Field-goal percentage44.0%Better result for this metric.41.4%
Three-point percentage29.8%Better result for this metric.23.5%
Free-throw percentage76.8%Better result for this metric.74.2%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Rod Foster and Stewart Granger
MetricRod FosterStewart Granger
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile19.9%25.4%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game2.3Better result for this metric.2.2
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Rod Foster and Stewart Granger
MetricRod FosterStewart Granger
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.6%Better result for this metric.18.2%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Rod Foster and Stewart Granger
MetricRod FosterStewart Granger
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile4.3%Better result for this metric.4.2%
Rebounds per game1.2Better result for this metric.1.0

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Rod Foster and Stewart Granger
MetricRod FosterStewart Granger
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.8%Better result for this metric.1.6%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Rod Foster and Stewart Granger
MetricRod FosterStewart Granger
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.2%Better result for this metric.0.0%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Rod Foster and Stewart Granger
MetricRod FosterStewart Granger
Points per game7.5Better result for this metric.4.0

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Rod Foster ranks higher in career impact.

Rod FosterMetricStewart Granger
#2110LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2260
-2.4LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-3.4
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
-94 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-57 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Rod Foster leads every available measure below.

Rod FosterMetricStewart Granger
109LeadsListed-team regular-season wins86
44.3%LeadsListed-team winning percentage35.0%
050-win team seasons0
060-win team seasons0
2LeadsPlayoff team seasons0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Rod FosterMetricStewart Granger
2Playoff appearancesNot available
19Playoff gamesNot available
9Team playoff winsNot available
0Finals appearancesNot available
0ChampionshipsNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Rod FosterMetricStewart Granger
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Rod FosterStewart GrangerPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.