hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Si Green vs. Wes Matthews: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Si Green ranks higher in career impact

Si Green

1956–57 to 1965–66 · 9 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#389LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1520
-0.3Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1Leads
-1.0LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2
40.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better140.3
+268 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+117 pts
62.2LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better194.2

Career Impact Rank places Si Green #389 and Wes Matthews #1520. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Wes Matthews had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/si-green/wes-matthews/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedSi Green46.693 · No. 389Wes Matthews154.967 · No. 1,520

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Si Green

46.693 composite · No. 389 all-time

Si Green's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 331960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate40.66750%20.333
Best 5No. 331960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 501958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 601962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate46.40030%13.920
Best 10No. 331960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 501958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 601962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 8862.20020%12.440

20.333 + 13.920 + 12.440= 46.693

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 88, this player's stored replacement finish.

Wes Matthews

154.967 composite · No. 1,520 all-time

Wes Matthews's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 951985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1631980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1631984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate140.33350%70.167
Best 5No. 951985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1631980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1631984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1711982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1741981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate153.20030%45.960
Best 10No. 951985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1631980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1631984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1711982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1741981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1991987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2121986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 255194.20020%38.840

70.167 + 45.960 + 38.840= 154.967

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 255, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Si Green and Wes Matthews
MetricSi GreenWes Matthews
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#389Better result for this metric.#1520
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better40.7Better result for this metric.140.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better46.4Better result for this metric.153.2
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better62.2Better result for this metric.194.2
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Si Green and Wes Matthews
MetricSi GreenWes Matthews
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1063Better result for this metric.#1376
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3+0.1Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.8Better result for this metric.-0.9
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.0Better result for this metric.-1.2
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+268 ptsBetter result for this metric.+117 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Si Green and Wes Matthews
MetricSi GreenWes Matthews
Games504465
Minutes13,1329,305

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Si Green and Wes Matthews
MetricSi GreenWes Matthews
True shooting percentage44.2%53.0%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile44.6%52.1%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Si Green and Wes Matthews
MetricSi GreenWes Matthews
Field-goal percentage38.7%47.8%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailable22.5%
Free-throw percentage67.6%78.8%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Si Green and Wes Matthews
MetricSi GreenWes Matthews
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.4%28.3%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game3.34.2Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Si Green and Wes Matthews
MetricSi GreenWes Matthews
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable21.0%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Si Green and Wes Matthews
MetricSi GreenWes Matthews
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable4.0%
Rebounds per game4.3Better result for this metric.1.3

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Si Green and Wes Matthews
MetricSi GreenWes Matthews
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable2.3%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Si Green and Wes Matthews
MetricSi GreenWes Matthews
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable0.4%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Si Green and Wes Matthews
MetricSi GreenWes Matthews
Points per game9.2Better result for this metric.7.9

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Si Green ranks higher in career impact.

Si GreenMetricWes Matthews
#389LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1520
-0.3Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1Leads
-1.0LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2
+268 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+117 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Wes Matthews leads every available measure below.

Si GreenMetricWes Matthews
459Listed-team regular-season wins488Leads
1.2%Listed-team winning percentage54.1%Leads
350-win team seasons3
260-win team seasons2
5Playoff team seasons8Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Si GreenMetricWes Matthews
4Playoff appearances7Leads
41LeadsPlayoff games38
19Team playoff wins34Leads
2Finals appearances2
0Championships2Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Si GreenMetricWes Matthews
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Si GreenWes MatthewsPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.