hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Andrew Bynum vs. Nic Claxton: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Andrew Bynum ranks higher in career impact so far

Illustrated portrait of NBA player Nic Claxton

Nic Claxton

2019–20 to 2025–26 · 7 seasons · active

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#521LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1146
+3.7LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.0
+2.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7
26.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better69.0
+698 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+750 ptsLeads
166.3LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better225.2

Career Impact Rank places Andrew Bynum #521 and Nic Claxton #1146. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Nic Claxton had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/andrew-bynum/nic-claxton/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedAndrew Bynum57.960 · No. 521Nic Claxton109.360 · No. 1,146

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Andrew Bynum

57.960 composite · No. 521 all-time

Andrew Bynum's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 192007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 262010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 332011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate26.00050%13.000
Best 5No. 192007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 262010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 332011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 522009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 652008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate39.00030%11.700
Best 10No. 192007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 262010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 332011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 522009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 652008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1912006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2632013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 338166.30020%33.260

13.000 + 11.700 + 33.260= 57.960

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 338, this player's stored replacement finish.

Nic Claxton

109.360 composite · No. 1,146 all-time

Nic Claxton's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 312022–23No. 642023–24No. 1122024–2569.00050%34.500
Best 5No. 312022–23No. 642023–24No. 1122024–25No. 1362021–22No. 1542020–2199.40030%29.820
Best 10No. 312022–23No. 642023–24No. 1122024–25No. 1362021–22No. 1542020–21No. 2232025–264 open slots × No. 383225.20020%45.040

34.500 + 29.820 + 45.040= 109.360

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 383, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Andrew Bynum and Nic Claxton
MetricAndrew BynumNic Claxton
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#521Better result for this metric.#1146
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better26.0Better result for this metric.69.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better39.0Better result for this metric.99.4
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better166.3Better result for this metric.225.2
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Andrew Bynum and Nic Claxton
MetricAndrew BynumNic Claxton
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#626#591Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.7Better result for this metric.+3.0
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.2Better result for this metric.+2.4
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.5Better result for this metric.+1.7
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+698 pts+750 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Andrew Bynum and Nic Claxton
MetricAndrew BynumNic Claxton
Games418380
Minutes10,6909,944

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Andrew Bynum and Nic Claxton
MetricAndrew BynumNic Claxton
True shooting percentage59.2%62.5%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile58.8%62.8%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Andrew Bynum and Nic Claxton
MetricAndrew BynumNic Claxton
Field-goal percentage55.6%62.2%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage11.1%18.6%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage69.0%Better result for this metric.55.5%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Andrew Bynum and Nic Claxton
MetricAndrew BynumNic Claxton
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.0%11.3%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.22.1Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Andrew Bynum and Nic Claxton
MetricAndrew BynumNic Claxton
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.5%11.5%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Andrew Bynum and Nic Claxton
MetricAndrew BynumNic Claxton
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.1%Better result for this metric.16.0%
Rebounds per game7.7Better result for this metric.7.6

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Andrew Bynum and Nic Claxton
MetricAndrew BynumNic Claxton
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.6%1.4%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Andrew Bynum and Nic Claxton
MetricAndrew BynumNic Claxton
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile4.7%5.5%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Andrew Bynum and Nic Claxton
MetricAndrew BynumNic Claxton
Points per game11.5Better result for this metric.10.6

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Andrew Bynum ranks higher in career impact so far.

Andrew BynumMetricNic Claxton
#521LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1146
+3.7LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.0
+2.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7
+698 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+750 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Andrew Bynum leads every available measure below.

Andrew BynumMetricNic Claxton
453LeadsListed-team regular-season wins250
62.7%LeadsListed-team winning percentage45.1%
5Leads50-win team seasons0
1Leads60-win team seasons0
8LeadsPlayoff team seasons4

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Andrew Bynum leads every available measure below.

Andrew BynumMetricNic Claxton
6LeadsPlayoff appearances3
74LeadsPlayoff games20
45LeadsTeam playoff wins7
2LeadsFinals appearances0
2LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Andrew BynumMetricNic Claxton
1All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
1All-NBANot available
0All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Andrew BynumNic ClaxtonPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.