55.4 score · 98% MPG role factor
Explore rankings
Player profile · BRK
Nic Claxton
Nic Claxton advanced stats and career rankings
RoleC · Age 26
Availability69 games · 68 starts
Workload27.8 MPG · 1,920 minutes
Relative impactBRK #3 of 12 · C #34 of 72
UpdatedJul 21, 2026
28.4 total value · 395 qualified players
79.3 all-time composite · 7 seasons
Low ranking precision · Likely rank #37–#332
Bottom line · 2025–26
In 2025–26, Nic Claxton ranked 135th in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 52nd, led by elite passing. After adjusting for teammates and opponents, his on-court impact was weaker than the box score indicated, lowering his overall rating. Playing about 1,900 minutes, he finished in the 73rd percentile for total season value.
2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Nic Claxton's impact
395 qualified NBA playersEvery player in the comparison logged at least 450 minutes.
Compare with
Overall value
Impact Rate
66
55.4Season Value
73
28.4Scoring role
Usage
43
17.7%True shooting
62
59.2%3-point attempt rate
7
3.3%Free-throw rate
87
39.3%Creation and control
Assist rate
80
21.8%Turnover avoidance
47
12.3%Possession stats
Rebound rate
85
14.5%Steal rate
22
1.2%Block rate
89
3.7%Lineup signal
Offensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
8
−1.87Defensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
4
−2.36Workload
Minutes per game
70
27.8Games played
68
69Total minutes
77
1,920Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.
Every season
Nic Claxton advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26live model | BRK | 26 | 69 | 1,920 | +2.37 | 55.4 | #135 | 28.4 | 73rd | Established |
| 2024–25 | BRK | 25 | 70 | 1,882 | +0.99 | 71.4 | #112 | 112.9 | 78th | Strong |
| 2023–24 | BRK | 24 | 71 | 2,116 | +1.92 | 83.0 | #64 | 167.3 | 86th | Strong |
| 2022–23 | BRK | 23 | 76 | 2,271 | +3.04 | 92.1 | #31 | 234.6 | 93rd | Strong |
| 2021–22 | BRK | 22 | 47 | 974 | +0.41 | 64.8 | #136 | 48.4 | 53rd | Established |
| 2020–21 | BRK | 21 | 32 | 594 | +0.05 | 58.4 | #154 | 25.2 | 40th | Established |
| 2019–20Historical Defense Estimate | BRK | 20 | 15 | 187 | -4.10 | — | — | -8.3 | — | Limited |
Career movement
Nic Claxton's career impact by season
Peak +3.04 in 2022–23 · 7 seasons · 9,944 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Nic ClaxtonDaniel Gafford
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Nic Claxton
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
C · All-Time Career #745
Daniel Gafford
92%career match
91% season match · 2022–23 ↔ 2023–24C · All-Time Career #716Montrezl Harrell
92%career match
94% season match · 2022–23 ↔ 2018–19C · All-Time Career #1201Kyle O'Quinn
91%career match
84% season match · 2022–23 ↔ 2017–18C · All-Time Career #607Andrew Bynum
91%career match
96% season match · 2022–23 ↔ 2011–12C · All-Time Career #1112Christian Wood
90%career match
91% season match · 2022–23 ↔ 2021–22PF · All-Time Career #552Bob Kauffman
90%career match
92% season match · 2022–23 ↔ 1970–71Why this rank?
Why Nic Claxton ranks #135
The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.
Prior rank #52
Current total -4.26 ±0.8
Split model · O -1.87 · D -2.36 = -4.23
Maximum ±0.75
Before the within-season scale
56.1 unadjusted · 98% role factor · rank #135
RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.
What the point estimate meansLow precision
The model's 80% impact interval is -1.49 to +2.98. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.
- Top 25 chance
- 6%
- Top 50 chance
- 14%
- Top 100 chance
- 29%
- 80% rank range
- #37–#332
Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →