hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Brandan Wright vs. Otto Porter Jr.: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Brandan Wright ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#646LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#660
+3.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.7Leads
+2.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.4
27.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better38.7
+541 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+996 ptsLeads
197.2Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better168.6Leads

Career Impact Rank places Brandan Wright #646 and Otto Porter Jr. #660. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Otto Porter Jr. had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/brandan-wright/otto-porter-jr/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedBrandan Wright67.327 · No. 646Otto Porter Jr.68.713 · No. 660

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Brandan Wright

67.327 composite · No. 646 all-time

Brandan Wright's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 212011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 292013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 322014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate27.33350%13.667
Best 5No. 212011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 292013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 322014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 522012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1032008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate47.40030%14.220
Best 10No. 212011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 292013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 322014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 522012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1032008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate5 open slots × No. 347197.20020%39.440

13.667 + 14.220 + 39.440= 67.327

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 347, this player's stored replacement finish.

Otto Porter Jr.

68.713 composite · No. 660 all-time

Otto Porter Jr.'s Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 242017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 382016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 542021–2238.66750%19.333
Best 5No. 242017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 382016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 542021–22No. 652018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 802015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate52.20030%15.660
Best 10No. 242017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 382016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 542021–22No. 652018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 802015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1372020–21No. 1782014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 370168.60020%33.720

19.333 + 15.660 + 33.720= 68.713

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 370, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Brandan Wright and Otto Porter Jr.
MetricBrandan WrightOtto Porter Jr.
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#646Better result for this metric.#660
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better27.3Better result for this metric.38.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better47.4Better result for this metric.52.2
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better197.2168.6Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Brandan Wright and Otto Porter Jr.
MetricBrandan WrightOtto Porter Jr.
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#741#461Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.5+3.7Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.2Better result for this metric.+2.9
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.5Better result for this metric.+2.4
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+541 pts+996 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Brandan Wright and Otto Porter Jr.
MetricBrandan WrightOtto Porter Jr.
Games428527
Minutes6,94913,400

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Brandan Wright and Otto Porter Jr.
MetricBrandan WrightOtto Porter Jr.
True shooting percentage62.6%Better result for this metric.57.8%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile63.3%Better result for this metric.57.4%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Brandan Wright and Otto Porter Jr.
MetricBrandan WrightOtto Porter Jr.
Field-goal percentage60.7%Better result for this metric.47.7%
Three-point percentage0.0%39.7%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage67.4%79.7%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Brandan Wright and Otto Porter Jr.
MetricBrandan WrightOtto Porter Jr.
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile4.5%9.2%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game0.51.5Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Brandan Wright and Otto Porter Jr.
MetricBrandan WrightOtto Porter Jr.
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile7.6%Better result for this metric.8.2%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Brandan Wright and Otto Porter Jr.
MetricBrandan WrightOtto Porter Jr.
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.5%Better result for this metric.11.3%
Rebounds per game3.64.9Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Brandan Wright and Otto Porter Jr.
MetricBrandan WrightOtto Porter Jr.
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.5%2.1%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Brandan Wright and Otto Porter Jr.
MetricBrandan WrightOtto Porter Jr.
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile4.9%Better result for this metric.1.4%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Brandan Wright and Otto Porter Jr.
MetricBrandan WrightOtto Porter Jr.
Points per game7.010.3Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Brandan Wright ranks higher in career impact.

Brandan WrightMetricOtto Porter Jr.
#646LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#660
+3.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.7Leads
+2.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.4
+541 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+996 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Brandan Wright leads every available measure below.

Brandan WrightMetricOtto Porter Jr.
564LeadsListed-team regular-season wins470
49.8%LeadsListed-team winning percentage45.7%
2Leads50-win team seasons1
1Leads60-win team seasons0
7LeadsPlayoff team seasons5

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Otto Porter Jr. leads every available measure below.

Brandan WrightMetricOtto Porter Jr.
3Playoff appearances5Leads
12Playoff games50Leads
5Team playoff wins37Leads
0Finals appearances1Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Brandan WrightMetricOtto Porter Jr.
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Brandan WrightOtto Porter Jr.Peak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.