hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Charles Jones vs. Jeff Foster: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Charles Jones ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#726LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1188
+2.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.2
+0.9LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2
53.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better95.0
+448 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+441 pts
126.0LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better156.3

Career Impact Rank places Charles Jones #726 and Jeff Foster #1188. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/charles-jones-jonesch01/jeff-foster/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedCharles Jones73.873 · No. 726Jeff Foster114.760 · No. 1,188

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Charles Jones

73.873 composite · No. 726 all-time

Charles Jones's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 251984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate53.66750%26.833
Best 5No. 251984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 961989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1071990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate72.80030%21.840
Best 10No. 251984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 961989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1071990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1211987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1661992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1691988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2061991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2341993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate126.00020%25.200

26.833 + 21.840 + 25.200= 73.873

Jeff Foster

114.760 composite · No. 1,188 all-time

Jeff Foster's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 742003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 982007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1132005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate95.00050%47.500
Best 5No. 742003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 982007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1132005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1572010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1582006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate120.00030%36.000
Best 10No. 742003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 982007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1132005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1572010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1582006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1642004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1772008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2032002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2092000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2102001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate156.30020%31.260

47.500 + 36.000 + 31.260= 114.760

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Charles Jones and Jeff Foster
MetricCharles JonesJeff Foster
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#726Better result for this metric.#1188
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better53.7Better result for this metric.95.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better72.8Better result for this metric.120.0
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better126.0Better result for this metric.156.3
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Charles Jones and Jeff Foster
MetricCharles JonesJeff Foster
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#833Better result for this metric.#841
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.5Better result for this metric.+1.2
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.4Better result for this metric.+0.6
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9Better result for this metric.+0.2
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3Better result for this metric.-0.5
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+448 ptsBetter result for this metric.+441 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Charles Jones and Jeff Foster
MetricCharles JonesJeff Foster
Games726764
Minutes14,09515,750

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Charles Jones and Jeff Foster
MetricCharles JonesJeff Foster
True shooting percentage51.4%53.1%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile51.3%52.1%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Charles Jones and Jeff Foster
MetricCharles JonesJeff Foster
Field-goal percentage48.0%49.7%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage0.0%13.0%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage61.8%Better result for this metric.61.5%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Charles Jones and Jeff Foster
MetricCharles JonesJeff Foster
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.3%6.8%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game0.90.9
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Charles Jones and Jeff Foster
MetricCharles JonesJeff Foster
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile21.8%14.7%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Charles Jones and Jeff Foster
MetricCharles JonesJeff Foster
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.9%19.2%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game4.56.9Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Charles Jones and Jeff Foster
MetricCharles JonesJeff Foster
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.6%1.7%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Charles Jones and Jeff Foster
MetricCharles JonesJeff Foster
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile4.7%Better result for this metric.1.5%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Charles Jones and Jeff Foster
MetricCharles JonesJeff Foster
Points per game2.54.9Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Charles Jones ranks higher in career impact.

Charles JonesMetricJeff Foster
#726LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1188
+2.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.2
+0.9LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2
+448 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+441 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Charles JonesMetricJeff Foster
610LeadsListed-team regular-season wins551
46.5%Listed-team winning percentage52.5%Leads
250-win team seasons2
060-win team seasons1Leads
10LeadsPlayoff team seasons9

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Charles JonesMetricJeff Foster
8LeadsPlayoff appearances7
44Playoff games53Leads
34LeadsTeam playoff wins24
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Charles JonesMetricJeff Foster
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Charles JonesJeff FosterPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.