Best league finish
Menu
Player profile · CHI / DET / HOU / PHI / WSB
Charles Jones
Charles Jones stats, teams and career impact
#726 all-timeCareer averages · 2.5 PPG · 4.5 RPG · 0.9 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
- Position
- Center
- Final NBA team
- Houston Rockets
- Height / weight
- 6 ft 9 in (206 cm) · 215 lb (98 kg)
- Born
- April 3, 1957 (69 yrs old)
- College
- Albany State University
- NBA seasons
- 15 seasons · 1983–84 to 1997–98
Career summaryCharles Jones was a center who played 15 NBA seasons, from 1983–84 through 1997–98.
- Career PPG
- 2.5
- Career RPG
- 4.5
- Career APG
- 0.9
- #25 in 1984–85
- #726 all-time
Career overview
Why Charles Jones ranks #726 all time
Charles Jones ranks #726 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #53.7. His full-career value ranks #833, so this placement is driven more by dominance than longevity.
450+ minutes required per season
726 games · Career Value Rank #833
Head to head
Compare Charles Jones with…
Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.
- Charles Jones vs. Darryl Dawkins Similar career path
- Charles Jones vs. Jeff Foster Similar career path
- Charles Jones vs. Amir Johnson Similar career path
- Charles Jones vs. Benoit Benjamin Similar career path
- Charles Jones vs. Mike Gminski Similar career path
- Charles Jones vs. Anthony Tolliver Similar career path
- Charles Jones vs. Michael Cage Same-era comparison
- Charles Jones vs. Sedale Threatt Same-era comparison
- Charles Jones vs. Tom Chambers Same-era comparison
- Charles Jones vs. Byron Scott Same-era comparison
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources
Full team history
- Teams
- Philadelphia 76ers, Chicago Bulls, Washington Bullets, Detroit Pistons, and Houston Rockets
Career shooting
NBA regular season- Field goal
- 48.0%FG%
- Three-point
- 0.0%3P%
- Free throw
- 61.8%FT%
726 career games · 14,095 minutes
Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.
Traditional box score
Charles Jones stats by season
Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.
Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.
Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →
| pts/100 · higher is better | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1997–98 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | -7.65 | HOU | 24 | 0 | 5.3 | 70.0% | — | 50.0% | — | -13.6 |
| 1996–97 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.3 | -7.11 | HOU | 12 | 0 | 7.8 | 40.0% | — | — | — | -9.1 |
| 1995–96 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 0.3 | -2.88 | HOU | 46 | 0 | 6.5 | 31.6% | — | 30.8% | — | -5.1 |
| 1994–95 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 0.0 | -11.43 | HOU | 3 | 0 | 12.0 | 33.3% | — | 50.0% | — | -6.7 |
| 1993–94 | 2.2 | 5.6 | 0.7 | -2.40 | DET | 42 | 0 | 20.9 | 46.2% | 0.0% | 55.9% | #234 | -7.0 |
| 1992–93 | 1.3 | 4.1 | 0.6 | -1.22 | WSB | 67 | 21 | 18.0 | 52.4% | 0.0% | 57.9% | #166 | 19.2 |
| 1991–92 | 1.1 | 4.2 | 0.8 | -1.94 | WSB | 75 | 32 | 18.2 | 36.7% | — | 50.0% | #206 | 1.6 |
| 1990–91 | 2.6 | 5.8 | 0.8 | +0.12 | WSB | 62 | 54 | 24.2 | 54.0% | — | 58.0% | #107 | 64.6 |
| 1989–90 | 3.2 | 6.2 | 1.7 | +0.31 | WSB | 81 | 81 | 27.7 | 50.8% | — | 64.8% | #96 | 107.1 |
| 1988–89 | 2.6 | 4.8 | 0.8 | -1.62 | WSB | 53 | 45 | 21.8 | 48.0% | 0.0% | 64.0% | #169 | 9.2 |
| 1987–88 | 2.9 | 4.7 | 0.9 | -0.53 | WSB | 69 | 49 | 19.0 | 40.7% | 0.0% | 70.7% | #121 | 39.3 |
| 1986–87 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 1.0 | +0.84 | WSB | 79 | 64 | 20.4 | 47.4% | 0.0% | 63.2% | #61 | 95.3 |
| 1985–86 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 0.9 | +0.75 | WSB | 81 | 58 | 19.9 | 50.8% | 0.0% | 62.8% | #75 | 91.4 |
| 1984–85 | 5.6 | 5.9 | 0.8 | +2.47 | CHI/WSB | 31 | 4 | 21.5 | 52.8% | — | 69.0% | #25 | 62.3 |
| 1983–84 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -11.32 | PHI | 1 | 0 | 3.0 | 0.0% | — | 25.0% | — | -0.6 |
| Career | 2.5 | 4.5 | 0.9 | — | CHI/DET/HOU/PHI/WSB | 726 | — | 19.4 | 48.0% | 0.0% | 61.8% | — | — |
Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.
What these measures mean
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
- Impact Rate
- A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
- Impact estimate
- The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
- Impact Rate rank
- The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
- Value contribution / Season Value
- Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
- Career Impact Rank
- An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
73.9 composite · lower is better
72.8 average league finish
448 total value
- Impact Rate
- 0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.
Career standing
How Charles Jones ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons
Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.
- Best 3 effective weight
- 74%
- Missing-season finish
- 277.0
- Qualified seasons
- 10
- All-time rank
- #726
Every season
Charles Jones advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
Scroll for more columns
| pts/100 · higher is better | 0–100 · higher is better | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1997–98Historical Defense Estimate | HOU | 40 | 24 | 127 | -7.65 | — | — | -13.6 | — | Limited |
| 1996–97Historical Defense Estimate | HOU | 39 | 12 | 93 | -7.11 | — | — | -9.1 | — | Limited |
| 1995–96Historical Defense Estimate | HOU | 38 | 46 | 297 | -2.88 | — | — | -5.1 | — | Limited |
| 1994–95Historical Defense Estimate | HOU | 37 | 3 | 36 | -11.43 | — | — | -6.7 | — | Limited |
| 1993–94Historical Defense Estimate | DET | 36 | 42 | 877 | -2.40 | 19.9 | #234 | -7.0 | 20th | Standard |
| 1992–93Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 35 | 67 | 1,206 | -1.22 | 44.1 | #166 | 19.2 | 41st | Broad |
| 1991–92Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 34 | 75 | 1,365 | -1.94 | 29.1 | #206 | 1.6 | 30th | Broad |
| 1990–91Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 33 | 62 | 1,499 | +0.12 | 63.6 | #107 | 64.6 | 60th | Broad |
| 1989–90Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 32 | 81 | 2,240 | +0.31 | 66.9 | #96 | 107.1 | 71st | Broad |
| 1988–89Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 31 | 53 | 1,154 | -1.62 | 36.1 | #169 | 9.2 | 35th | Broad |
| 1987–88Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 30 | 69 | 1,313 | -0.53 | 52.0 | #121 | 39.3 | 49th | Broad |
| 1986–87Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 29 | 79 | 1,609 | +0.84 | 76.6 | #61 | 95.3 | 68th | Broad |
| 1985–86Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 28 | 81 | 1,609 | +0.75 | 70.9 | #75 | 91.4 | 63rd | Broad |
| 1984–85Historical Defense Estimate | CHI/WSB | 27 | 31 | 667 | +2.47 | 90.5 | #25 | 62.3 | 57th | Standard |
| 1983–84Historical Defense Estimate | PHI | 26 | 1 | 3 | -11.32 | — | — | -0.6 | — | Limited |
Career movement
Charles Jones's box impact by season
Peak box impact +2.47 points per 100 possessions in 1984–85 · 15 seasons · 14,095 minutes
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
| NBA season | Charles Jones | Darryl Dawkins |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | -11.3 | -6.7 |
| 2 | 2.5 | 0.4 |
| 3 | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| 4 | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| 5 | -0.5 | -0.9 |
| 6 | -1.6 | -0.2 |
| 7 | 0.3 | -1.4 |
| 8 | 0.1 | -1.0 |
| 9 | -1.9 | 1.2 |
| 10 | -1.2 | -1.7 |
| 11 | -2.4 | 1.7 |
| 12 | -11.4 | -7.9 |
| 13 | -2.9 | -14.2 |
| 14 | -7.1 | -11.8 |
| 15 | -7.6 | Did not play |
NBA season number
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Charles Jones
The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.
Darryl Dawkins
87career similarity score
90/100 closest-season score · 1984–85 ↔ 1985–86C · All-Time Career #1188Jeff Foster
86career similarity score
82/100 closest-season score · 1984–85 ↔ 2005–06PF · All-Time Career #937Amir Johnson
86career similarity score
86/100 closest-season score · 1984–85 ↔ 2017–18Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →