hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Charlie Scott vs. Jim Cleamons: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Jim Cleamons ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#934Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#794Leads
+0.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1Leads
-0.2Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1Leads
69.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better62.7Leads
+259 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+604 ptsLeads
146.2Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better123.0Leads

Career Impact Rank places Jim Cleamons #794 and Charlie Scott #934. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/charlie-scott/jim-cleamons/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedCharlie Scott89.240 · No. 934Jim Cleamons78.733 · No. 794

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Charlie Scott

89.240 composite · No. 934 all-time

Charlie Scott's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 461973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 921975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate69.00050%34.500
Best 5No. 461973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 921975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 981972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1201976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate85.00030%25.500
Best 10No. 461973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 921975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 981972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1201976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1811977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2081978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2291979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 209.5146.20020%29.240

34.500 + 25.500 + 29.240= 89.240

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 209.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Jim Cleamons

78.733 composite · No. 794 all-time

Jim Cleamons's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 441975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 661972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 781974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate62.66750%31.333
Best 5No. 441975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 661972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 781974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 891976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1031973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate76.00030%22.800
Best 10No. 441975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 661972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 781974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 891976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1031973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1401978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1411977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1501979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 209.5123.00020%24.600

31.333 + 22.800 + 24.600= 78.733

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 209.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Charlie Scott and Jim Cleamons
MetricCharlie ScottJim Cleamons
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#934#794Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better69.062.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better85.076.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better146.2123.0Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Charlie Scott and Jim Cleamons
MetricCharlie ScottJim Cleamons
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1082#688Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.7+1.1Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2+0.5Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.2+0.1Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+259 pts+604 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Charlie Scott and Jim Cleamons
MetricCharlie ScottJim Cleamons
Games560652
Minutes19,27816,994

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Charlie Scott and Jim Cleamons
MetricCharlie ScottJim Cleamons
True shooting percentage48.7%50.1%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile48.4%50.2%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Charlie Scott and Jim Cleamons
MetricCharlie ScottJim Cleamons
Field-goal percentage44.4%46.0%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage18.2%22.6%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage77.2%Better result for this metric.76.5%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Charlie Scott and Jim Cleamons
MetricCharlie ScottJim Cleamons
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile20.4%Better result for this metric.19.6%
Assists per game4.8Better result for this metric.3.9
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Charlie Scott and Jim Cleamons
MetricCharlie ScottJim Cleamons
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile19.0%17.6%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Charlie Scott and Jim Cleamons
MetricCharlie ScottJim Cleamons
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.3%6.0%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game3.6Better result for this metric.3.0

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Charlie Scott and Jim Cleamons
MetricCharlie ScottJim Cleamons
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.7%Better result for this metric.1.6%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Charlie Scott and Jim Cleamons
MetricCharlie ScottJim Cleamons
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.5%Better result for this metric.0.4%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Charlie Scott and Jim Cleamons
MetricCharlie ScottJim Cleamons
Points per game17.9Better result for this metric.8.3

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Jim Cleamons ranks higher in career impact.

Charlie ScottMetricJim Cleamons
#934Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#794Leads
+0.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1Leads
-0.2Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1Leads
+259 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+604 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Charlie ScottMetricJim Cleamons
608LeadsListed-team regular-season wins605
0.6%Listed-team winning percentage0.6%
550-win team seasons5
560-win team seasons5
4Playoff team seasons5Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Charlie ScottMetricJim Cleamons
4Playoff appearances4
33LeadsPlayoff games27
19Team playoff wins20Leads
1Finals appearances1
1Championships1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Charlie ScottMetricJim Cleamons
4LeadsAll-Star0
0MVP0
0All-NBA0
0All-Defense1Leads
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Charlie ScottJim CleamonsPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.