87.8 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · BOS / DEN / LAL / PHO
Charlie Scott
Charlie Scott advanced stats and career rankings
85.0 average league finish
259 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Charlie Scott ranks #1566 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #69.0. His full-career value ranks #1082, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Charlie Scott's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Charlie Scott ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite87.8
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 87.8
- Qualified seasons
- 8
- All-time rank
- #1566
Strongest seasons
Every season
Charlie Scott advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1979–80Historical Defense Estimate | DEN | 31 | 69 | 1,860 | -5.22 | 1.3 | #229 | -129.8 | 0th | Strong |
| 1978–79Historical Defense Estimate | DEN | 30 | 79 | 2,617 | -3.18 | 8.8 | #208 | -68.0 | 1st | Strong |
| 1977–78Historical Defense Estimate | BOS/LAL | 29 | 79 | 2,473 | -2.05 | 23.7 | #181 | -2.7 | 21st | Strong |
| 1976–77Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 28 | 43 | 1,581 | -0.51 | 51.0 | #120 | 52.6 | 52nd | Strong |
| 1975–76Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 27 | 82 | 2,913 | -0.62 | 51.6 | #92 | 89.3 | 64th | Strong |
| 1974–75Historical Defense Estimate | PHO | 26 | 69 | 2,592 | +0.31 | 63.6 | #69 | 130.1 | 72nd | Strong |
| 1973–74Historical Defense Estimate | PHO | 25 | 52 | 2,003 | +0.67 | 74.4 | #46 | 122.1 | 70th | Strong |
| 1972–73Historical Defense Estimate | PHO | 24 | 81 | 3,062 | -0.94 | 43.6 | #98 | 76.5 | 56th | Modeled |
| 1971–72Historical Defense Estimate | PHO | 23 | 6 | 177 | -4.80 | — | — | -11.7 | — | Modeled |
Career movement
Charlie Scott's career impact by season
Peak +0.67 in 1973–74 · 9 seasons · 19,278 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutesModeled estimate
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Charlie ScottTravis Best
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Charlie Scott
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
PG · All-Time Career #2543
Travis Best
92%career match
90% season match · 1973–74 ↔ 1999–00PG · All-Time Career #2622Chris Duhon
92%career match
92% season match · 1973–74 ↔ 2005–06PG · All-Time Career #629Slater Martin
91%career match
96% season match · 1973–74 ↔ 1950–51PG · All-Time Career #1885Larry Drew
91%career match
94% season match · 1973–74 ↔ 1983–84PG · All-Time Career #429Larry Siegfried
91%career match
94% season match · 1973–74 ↔ 1965–66SG · All-Time Career #2539Gerald Henderson
91%career match
93% season match · 1973–74 ↔ 2012–13Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →