hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Daniel Gibson vs. John Barnhill: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

John Barnhill ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1630Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#451Leads
+0.2Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.4Leads
-0.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.9
140.7Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better43.7Leads
+197 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+268 ptsLeads
236.4Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better73.6Leads

Career Impact Rank places John Barnhill #451 and Daniel Gibson #1630. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/daniel-gibson/john-barnhill/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDaniel Gibson166.753 · No. 1,630John Barnhill52.153 · No. 451

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Daniel Gibson

166.753 composite · No. 1,630 all-time

Daniel Gibson's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1242010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1292007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1692009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate140.66750%70.333
Best 5No. 1242010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1292007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1692009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1772006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2202011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate163.80030%49.140
Best 10No. 1242010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1292007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1692009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1772006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2202011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2232008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3082012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 338236.40020%47.280

70.333 + 49.140 + 47.280= 166.753

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 338, this player's stored replacement finish.

John Barnhill

52.153 composite · No. 451 all-time

John Barnhill's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 231962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 531966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate43.66750%21.833
Best 5No. 231962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 531966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 681964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate52.00030%15.600
Best 10No. 231962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 531966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 681964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 741967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1171968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 9573.60020%14.720

21.833 + 15.600 + 14.720= 52.153

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 95, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Daniel Gibson and John Barnhill
MetricDaniel GibsonJohn Barnhill
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1630#451Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better140.743.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better163.852.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better236.473.6Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Daniel Gibson and John Barnhill
MetricDaniel GibsonJohn Barnhill
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1185#1060Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2+0.4Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.2Better result for this metric.-0.6
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5Better result for this metric.-0.9
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+197 pts+268 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Daniel Gibson and John Barnhill
MetricDaniel GibsonJohn Barnhill
Games397426
Minutes9,31610,054

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Daniel Gibson and John Barnhill
MetricDaniel GibsonJohn Barnhill
True shooting percentage54.2%Better result for this metric.45.2%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile54.0%Better result for this metric.44.9%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Daniel Gibson and John Barnhill
MetricDaniel GibsonJohn Barnhill
Field-goal percentage40.2%41.6%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage40.7%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage78.0%Better result for this metric.65.1%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Daniel Gibson and John Barnhill
MetricDaniel GibsonJohn Barnhill
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.9%16.1%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game2.02.8Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Daniel Gibson and John Barnhill
MetricDaniel GibsonJohn Barnhill
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.9%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Daniel Gibson and John Barnhill
MetricDaniel GibsonJohn Barnhill
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile4.9%Unavailable
Rebounds per game2.02.8Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Daniel Gibson and John Barnhill
MetricDaniel GibsonJohn Barnhill
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.4%Unavailable
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Daniel Gibson and John Barnhill
MetricDaniel GibsonJohn Barnhill
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.7%Unavailable

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Daniel Gibson and John Barnhill
MetricDaniel GibsonJohn Barnhill
Points per game7.88.6Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

John Barnhill ranks higher in career impact.

Daniel GibsonMetricJohn Barnhill
#1630Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#451Leads
+0.2Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.4Leads
-0.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.9
+197 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+268 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Daniel GibsonMetricJohn Barnhill
286Listed-team regular-season wins579Leads
51.3%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.5%
350-win team seasons6Leads
260-win team seasons6Leads
4Playoff team seasons5Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Daniel Gibson leads every available measure below.

Daniel GibsonMetricJohn Barnhill
4Playoff appearances4
50LeadsPlayoff games21
35LeadsTeam playoff wins13
1LeadsFinals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Daniel GibsonMetricJohn Barnhill
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Daniel GibsonJohn BarnhillPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.