hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Calvin Natt vs. Danny Granger: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Calvin Natt ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#349LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#416
+4.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.0Leads
+2.3Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.0Leads
25.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better23.0Leads
+1,440 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,427 pts
0Top-10 impact seasons1Leads

Career Impact Rank places Calvin Natt #349 and Danny Granger #416. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Danny Granger had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/calvin-natt/danny-granger/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedCalvin Natt42.427 · No. 349Danny Granger49.080 · No. 416

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Calvin Natt

42.427 composite · No. 349 all-time

Calvin Natt's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 151984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 311981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate25.33350%12.667
Best 5No. 151984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 311981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate35.00030%10.500
Best 10No. 151984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 311981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 601983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1051987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1161980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 253.596.30020%19.260

12.667 + 10.500 + 19.260= 42.427

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 253.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Danny Granger

49.080 composite · No. 416 all-time

Danny Granger's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 82008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 142009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 472010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate23.00050%11.500
Best 5No. 82008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 142009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 472010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 532011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 582007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate36.00030%10.800
Best 10No. 82008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 142009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 472010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 532011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 582007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 802005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1152006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2722013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3542014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 338133.90020%26.780

11.500 + 10.800 + 26.780= 49.080

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 338, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Calvin Natt and Danny Granger
MetricCalvin NattDanny Granger
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#349Better result for this metric.#416
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better25.323.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better35.0Better result for this metric.36.0
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better96.3Better result for this metric.133.9
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Calvin Natt and Danny Granger
MetricCalvin NattDanny Granger
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#304Better result for this metric.#307
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.0+5.0Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.9+3.8Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.3+3.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,440 ptsBetter result for this metric.+1,427 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons01Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Calvin Natt and Danny Granger
MetricCalvin NattDanny Granger
Games599586
Minutes18,81818,487

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Calvin Natt and Danny Granger
MetricCalvin NattDanny Granger
True shooting percentage57.9%Better result for this metric.56.0%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile57.7%Better result for this metric.55.1%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Calvin Natt and Danny Granger
MetricCalvin NattDanny Granger
Field-goal percentage52.8%Better result for this metric.43.4%
Three-point percentage21.9%38.0%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage76.8%84.8%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Calvin Natt and Danny Granger
MetricCalvin NattDanny Granger
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.1%Better result for this metric.9.7%
Assists per game2.2Better result for this metric.1.9
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Calvin Natt and Danny Granger
MetricCalvin NattDanny Granger
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.3%11.3%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Calvin Natt and Danny Granger
MetricCalvin NattDanny Granger
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.6%Better result for this metric.8.8%
Rebounds per game6.8Better result for this metric.4.9

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Calvin Natt and Danny Granger
MetricCalvin NattDanny Granger
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.3%1.4%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Calvin Natt and Danny Granger
MetricCalvin NattDanny Granger
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.6%1.8%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Calvin Natt and Danny Granger
MetricCalvin NattDanny Granger
Points per game17.2Better result for this metric.16.8

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Calvin Natt ranks higher in career impact.

Calvin NattMetricDanny Granger
#349LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#416
+4.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.0Leads
+2.3Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.0Leads
+1,440 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,427 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Calvin NattMetricDanny Granger
550LeadsListed-team regular-season wins458
51.6%Listed-team winning percentage51.8%Leads
250-win team seasons2
060-win team seasons0
10LeadsPlayoff team seasons6

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Calvin Natt leads every available measure below.

Calvin NattMetricDanny Granger
7LeadsPlayoff appearances4
45LeadsPlayoff games35
20LeadsTeam playoff wins15
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Calvin NattMetricDanny Granger
1All-Star1
0MVP0
0All-NBA0
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Calvin NattDanny GrangerPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.