hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Dante Cunningham vs. Omri Casspi: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Omri Casspi ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1628Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1346Leads
+1.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.2Leads
-0.3Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2Leads
148.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better112.7Leads
+216 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+296 ptsLeads
216.0Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better183.5Leads

Career Impact Rank places Omri Casspi #1346 and Dante Cunningham #1628. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/dante-cunningham/omri-casspi/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDante Cunningham166.447 · No. 1,628Omri Casspi133.353 · No. 1,346

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Dante Cunningham

166.447 composite · No. 1,628 all-time

Dante Cunningham's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 972011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1702016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1782013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate148.33350%74.167
Best 5No. 972011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1702016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1782013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1822012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1912018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate163.60030%49.080
Best 10No. 972011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1702016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1782013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1822012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1912018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2162009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2522017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2762010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2952015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3032014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate216.00020%43.200

74.167 + 49.080 + 43.200= 166.447

Omri Casspi

133.353 composite · No. 1,346 all-time

Omri Casspi's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 902018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1002012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1482015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate112.66750%56.333
Best 5No. 902018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1002012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1482015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1622017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1722010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate134.40030%40.320
Best 10No. 902018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1002012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1482015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1622017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1722010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1812009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2192013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2272011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2432014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2932016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate183.50020%36.700

56.333 + 40.320 + 36.700= 133.353

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Dante Cunningham and Omri Casspi
MetricDante CunninghamOmri Casspi
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1628#1346Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better148.3112.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better163.6134.4Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better216.0183.5Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Dante Cunningham and Omri Casspi
MetricDante CunninghamOmri Casspi
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1156#1017Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1+1.2Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.0+0.6Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3+0.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2-0.7Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+216 pts+296 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Dante Cunningham and Omri Casspi
MetricDante CunninghamOmri Casspi
Games715588
Minutes14,87511,959

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Dante Cunningham and Omri Casspi
MetricDante CunninghamOmri Casspi
True shooting percentage51.3%54.7%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile52.2%54.9%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Dante Cunningham and Omri Casspi
MetricDante CunninghamOmri Casspi
Field-goal percentage46.9%Better result for this metric.45.4%
Three-point percentage34.5%36.8%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage64.9%67.8%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Dante Cunningham and Omri Casspi
MetricDante CunninghamOmri Casspi
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.0%8.8%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game0.71.1Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Dante Cunningham and Omri Casspi
MetricDante CunninghamOmri Casspi
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.2%Better result for this metric.12.4%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Dante Cunningham and Omri Casspi
MetricDante CunninghamOmri Casspi
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.5%11.5%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game3.74.0Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Dante Cunningham and Omri Casspi
MetricDante CunninghamOmri Casspi
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.6%1.6%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Dante Cunningham and Omri Casspi
MetricDante CunninghamOmri Casspi
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.9%Better result for this metric.1.0%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Dante Cunningham and Omri Casspi
MetricDante CunninghamOmri Casspi
Points per game5.87.9Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Omri Casspi ranks higher in career impact.

Dante CunninghamMetricOmri Casspi
#1628Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1346Leads
+1.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.2Leads
-0.3Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2Leads
+216 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+296 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Dante CunninghamMetricOmri Casspi
477LeadsListed-team regular-season wins398
49.3%LeadsListed-team winning percentage41.1%
150-win team seasons2Leads
060-win team seasons0
6LeadsPlayoff team seasons2

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Dante CunninghamMetricOmri Casspi
4Playoff appearancesNot available
21Playoff gamesNot available
8Team playoff winsNot available
0Finals appearancesNot available
0ChampionshipsNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Dante CunninghamMetricOmri Casspi
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Dante CunninghamOmri CasspiPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.