Dick Barnett
1959–60 to 1973–74 · 14 seasons
NBA player comparison
Dick Barnett vs. Hal Greer: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Hal Greer ranks higher in career impact
Hal Greer
1958–59 to 1972–73 · 15 seasons
Impact comparison
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.
#145Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#78Leads
+1.9Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.1Leads
+0.9Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.9Leads
14.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better10.3Leads
+1,249 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+3,009 ptsLeads
33.2Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better15.5Leads
Career Impact Rank places Hal Greer #78 and Dick Barnett #145. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDick Barnett19.327 · No. 145Hal Greer11.867 · No. 78
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Dick Barnett
19.327 composite · No. 145 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 71965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 14.333 | 50% | 7.167 |
| Best 5No. 71965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 18.400 | 30% | 5.520 |
| Best 10No. 71965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 291967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 311959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 571964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 721969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 33.200 | 20% | 6.640 |
7.167 + 5.520 + 6.640= 19.327
Hal Greer
11.867 composite · No. 78 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 91961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 10.333 | 50% | 5.167 |
| Best 5No. 91961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 12.000 | 30% | 3.600 |
| Best 10No. 91961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 131962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 15.500 | 20% | 3.100 |
5.167 + 3.600 + 3.100= 11.867
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Dick Barnett | Hal Greer |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #145 | #78Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 14.3 | 10.3Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 18.4 | 12.0Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 33.2 | 15.5Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Dick Barnett | Hal Greer |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #364 | #91Better result for this metric. |
| Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +1.9 | +2.1Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +1.1 | +2.0Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +0.9 | +1.9Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +0.2 | +1.5Better result for this metric. |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +1,249 pts | +3,009 ptsBetter result for this metric. |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 1 | 1 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Dick Barnett | Hal Greer |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 971 | 1,122 |
| Minutes | 28,937 | 39,788 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Dick Barnett | Hal Greer |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 50.8%Better result for this metric. | 50.6% |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 51.1%Better result for this metric. | 51.0% |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Dick Barnett | Hal Greer |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 45.6%Better result for this metric. | 45.2% |
| Three-point percentage | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Free-throw percentage | 76.1% | 80.1%Better result for this metric. |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Dick Barnett | Hal Greer |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 13.2% | 15.7%Better result for this metric. |
| Assists per game | 2.8 | 4.0Better result for this metric. |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Dick Barnett | Hal Greer |
|---|---|---|
| Rebounds per game | 2.9 | 5.0Better result for this metric. |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Dick Barnett | Hal Greer |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 15.8 | 19.2Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Hal Greer ranks higher in career impact.
Dick BarnettMetricHal Greer
#145Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#78Leads
+1.9Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.1Leads
+0.9Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.9Leads
+1,249 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,009 ptsLeads
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
Dick Barnett leads every available measure below.
Dick BarnettMetricHal Greer
993LeadsListed-team regular-season wins974
0.5%Listed-team winning percentage0.5%
11Leads50-win team seasons9
10Leads60-win team seasons9
13Playoff team seasons13
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Dick BarnettMetricHal Greer
11Playoff appearances13Leads
102LeadsPlayoff games92
66LeadsTeam playoff wins46
5LeadsFinals appearances1
2LeadsChampionships1
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
Hal Greer leads every available measure below.
Dick BarnettMetricHal Greer
1All-Star10Leads
0MVP0
0All-NBA7Leads
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Dick BarnettHal GreerPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Dick BarnettNBA seasonHal Greer
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Season 8
Season 9
Season 10
Season 11
Season 12
Season 13
Season 14
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.