hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Draymond Green vs. Jack Sikma: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Jack Sikma ranks higher in career impact so far

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#198Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#92Leads
+5.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.2Leads
+3.8LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.7
17.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better8.3Leads
+2,338 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+3,292 ptsLeads
1Top-10 impact seasons2Leads

Career Impact Rank places Jack Sikma #92 and Draymond Green #198. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/draymond-green/jack-sikma/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDraymond Green26.280 · No. 198Jack Sikma13.427 · No. 92

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Draymond Green

26.280 composite · No. 198 all-time

Draymond Green's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 102015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 172016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 242014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate17.00050%8.500
Best 5No. 102015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 172016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 242014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 322017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 512021–2226.80030%8.040
Best 10No. 102015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 172016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 242014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 322017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 512021–22No. 562023–24No. 602013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 672018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 832019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 872020–2148.70020%9.740

8.500 + 8.040 + 9.740= 26.280

Jack Sikma

13.427 composite · No. 92 all-time

Jack Sikma's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 61984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate8.33350%4.167
Best 5No. 61984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate14.60030%4.380
Best 10No. 61984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 291985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 361980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate24.40020%4.880

4.167 + 4.380 + 4.880= 13.427

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Draymond Green and Jack Sikma
MetricDraymond GreenJack Sikma
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#198#92Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better17.08.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better26.814.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better48.724.4Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Draymond Green and Jack Sikma
MetricDraymond GreenJack Sikma
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#141#72Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.1+5.2Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.5Better result for this metric.+4.4
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.8Better result for this metric.+3.7
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7+2.9Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,338 pts+3,292 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons12Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Draymond Green and Jack Sikma
MetricDraymond GreenJack Sikma
Games9491,107
Minutes27,15136,943

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Draymond Green and Jack Sikma
MetricDraymond GreenJack Sikma
True shooting percentage54.1%Better result for this metric.54.0%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile54.2%54.5%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Draymond Green and Jack Sikma
MetricDraymond GreenJack Sikma
Field-goal percentage44.7%46.4%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage32.1%32.8%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage71.0%84.9%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Draymond Green and Jack Sikma
MetricDraymond GreenJack Sikma
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile26.9%Better result for this metric.14.6%
Assists per game5.6Better result for this metric.3.2
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Draymond Green and Jack Sikma
MetricDraymond GreenJack Sikma
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile22.9%13.7%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Draymond Green and Jack Sikma
MetricDraymond GreenJack Sikma
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.2%16.6%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game6.89.8Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Draymond Green and Jack Sikma
MetricDraymond GreenJack Sikma
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.3%Better result for this metric.1.5%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Draymond Green and Jack Sikma
MetricDraymond GreenJack Sikma
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.9%Better result for this metric.1.6%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Draymond Green and Jack Sikma
MetricDraymond GreenJack Sikma
Points per game8.715.6Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Jack Sikma ranks higher in career impact so far.

Draymond GreenMetricJack Sikma
#198Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#92Leads
+5.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.2Leads
+3.8LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.7
+2,338 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,292 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Draymond GreenMetricJack Sikma
702LeadsListed-team regular-season wins626
62.6%LeadsListed-team winning percentage54.5%
7Leads50-win team seasons4
3Leads60-win team seasons0
10Playoff team seasons11Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Draymond GreenMetricJack Sikma
10Playoff appearances11Leads
169LeadsPlayoff games102
113LeadsTeam playoff wins49
6LeadsFinals appearances2
4LeadsChampionships1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Draymond GreenMetricJack Sikma
4All-Star7Leads
0MVP0
2LeadsAll-NBA0
9LeadsAll-Defense1
1LeadsDPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Draymond GreenJack SikmaPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.