hussEyquation
Menu

NBA player comparison

Jack Sikma vs. Robert Parish: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Jack Sikma ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison
#92LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#108
+5.2LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+4.8
8.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better10.7
+3,292 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+3,253 pts
24.4LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better29.9
+3.7Best 5 average impact+3.7

Career Impact Rank places Jack Sikma #92 and Robert Parish #108. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/jack-sikma/robert-parish/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJack Sikma13.427 · No. 92Robert Parish15.513 · No. 108

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Jack Sikma

13.427 composite · No. 92 all-time

Jack Sikma's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 61984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate8.33350%4.167
Best 5No. 61984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate14.60030%4.380
Best 10No. 61984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 291985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 361980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate24.40020%4.880

4.167 + 4.380 + 4.880= 13.427

Robert Parish

15.513 composite · No. 108 all-time

Robert Parish's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 61980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate10.66750%5.333
Best 5No. 61980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate14.00030%4.200
Best 10No. 61980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 381983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 421985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 571990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate29.90020%5.980

5.333 + 4.200 + 5.980= 15.513

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Jack Sikma and Robert Parish
MetricJack SikmaRobert Parish
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#92Better result for this metric.#108
Best 3 average finish8.3Better result for this metric.10.7
Best 5 average finish14.614.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finish24.4Better result for this metric.29.9
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Jack Sikma and Robert Parish
MetricJack SikmaRobert Parish
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#72Better result for this metric.#75
Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+5.2Better result for this metric.+4.8
Best 3 average impact+4.4Better result for this metric.+4.2
Best 5 average impact+3.7+3.7
Best 10 average impact+2.9Better result for this metric.+2.6
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,292 ptsBetter result for this metric.+3,253 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons22

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Jack Sikma and Robert Parish
MetricJack SikmaRobert Parish
Games1,1071,611
Minutes36,94345,704

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Jack Sikma and Robert Parish
MetricJack SikmaRobert Parish
True shooting percentage54.0%57.1%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile54.5%57.8%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Jack Sikma and Robert Parish
MetricJack SikmaRobert Parish
Field-goal percentage46.4%53.7%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage32.8%Better result for this metric.0.0%
Free-throw percentage84.9%Better result for this metric.72.1%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Jack Sikma and Robert Parish
MetricJack SikmaRobert Parish
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.6%Better result for this metric.7.3%
Assists per game3.2Better result for this metric.1.4
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Jack Sikma and Robert Parish
MetricJack SikmaRobert Parish
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.7%13.5%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Jack Sikma and Robert Parish
MetricJack SikmaRobert Parish
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.6%18.9%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game9.8Better result for this metric.9.1

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Jack Sikma and Robert Parish
MetricJack SikmaRobert Parish
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.5%Better result for this metric.1.4%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Jack Sikma and Robert Parish
MetricJack SikmaRobert Parish
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.6%3.4%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Jack Sikma and Robert Parish
MetricJack SikmaRobert Parish
Points per game15.6Better result for this metric.14.5

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Jack Sikma ranks higher in career impact.

Jack SikmaMetricRobert Parish
#92LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#108
+5.2LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+4.8
+3.7Best 5 average impact+3.7
+3,292 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,253 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Robert Parish leads every available measure below.

Jack SikmaMetricRobert Parish
626Listed-team regular-season wins1,081Leads
54.5%Listed-team winning percentage62.8%Leads
450-win team seasons13Leads
060-win team seasons6Leads
11Playoff team seasons16Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Robert Parish leads every available measure below.

Jack SikmaMetricRobert Parish
11Playoff appearances16Leads
102Playoff games184Leads
49Team playoff wins121Leads
2Finals appearances6Leads
1Championships4Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Jack SikmaMetricRobert Parish
7All-Star9Leads
0MVP0
0All-NBA2Leads
1LeadsAll-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Jack SikmaRobert ParishPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17
S18
S19
S20
S21
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.