hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Gene Shue vs. Johnny Davis: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Gene Shue ranks higher in career impact

Illustrated portrait of NBA player Gene Shue

Gene Shue

1954–55 to 1963–64 · 10 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#185LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#941
+1.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3
+0.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2
19.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better75.7
+1,003 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+695 pts
39.3LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better121.0

Career Impact Rank places Gene Shue #185 and Johnny Davis #941. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/gene-shue/johnny-davis-davisjo01/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedGene Shue24.727 · No. 185Johnny Davis89.753 · No. 941

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Gene Shue

24.727 composite · No. 185 all-time

Gene Shue's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 141956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate19.33350%9.667
Best 5No. 141956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate24.00030%7.200
Best 10No. 141956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 361955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 721962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 911963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate39.30020%7.860

9.667 + 7.200 + 7.860= 24.727

Johnny Davis

89.753 composite · No. 941 all-time

Johnny Davis's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 591982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 781981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 901980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate75.66750%37.833
Best 5No. 591982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 781981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 901980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1101978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1251984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate92.40030%27.720
Best 10No. 591982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 781981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 901980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1101978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1251984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1301983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1311979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1411985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1571977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1891976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate121.00020%24.200

37.833 + 27.720 + 24.200= 89.753

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Gene Shue and Johnny Davis
MetricGene ShueJohnny Davis
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#185Better result for this metric.#941
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better19.3Better result for this metric.75.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better24.0Better result for this metric.92.4
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better39.3Better result for this metric.121.0
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Gene Shue and Johnny Davis
MetricGene ShueJohnny Davis
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#456Better result for this metric.#628
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5Better result for this metric.+1.3
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9Better result for this metric.+0.7
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5Better result for this metric.+0.2
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.6-0.5Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,003 ptsBetter result for this metric.+695 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Gene Shue and Johnny Davis
MetricGene ShueJohnny Davis
Games699750
Minutes23,33821,200

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Gene Shue and Johnny Davis
MetricGene ShueJohnny Davis
True shooting percentage46.5%51.2%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile44.6%51.3%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Gene Shue and Johnny Davis
MetricGene ShueJohnny Davis
Field-goal percentage39.6%44.8%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailable17.6%
Free-throw percentage80.6%82.1%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Gene Shue and Johnny Davis
MetricGene ShueJohnny Davis
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable23.2%
Assists per game3.74.5Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Gene Shue and Johnny Davis
MetricGene ShueJohnny Davis
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable13.9%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Gene Shue and Johnny Davis
MetricGene ShueJohnny Davis
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable3.8%
Rebounds per game4.1Better result for this metric.2.0

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Gene Shue and Johnny Davis
MetricGene ShueJohnny Davis
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable1.5%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Gene Shue and Johnny Davis
MetricGene ShueJohnny Davis
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable0.3%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Gene Shue and Johnny Davis
MetricGene ShueJohnny Davis
Points per game14.4Better result for this metric.12.9

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Gene Shue ranks higher in career impact.

Gene ShueMetricJohnny Davis
#185LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#941
+1.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3
+0.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2
+1,003 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+695 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Gene ShueMetricJohnny Davis
354Listed-team regular-season wins459Leads
42.9%Listed-team winning percentage50.9%Leads
050-win team seasons2Leads
060-win team seasons0
8LeadsPlayoff team seasons7

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Johnny Davis leads every available measure below.

Gene ShueMetricJohnny Davis
7Playoff appearances7
32Playoff games43Leads
12Team playoff wins24Leads
0Finals appearances1Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Gene ShueMetricJohnny Davis
5All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
2All-NBANot available
0All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Gene ShueJohnny DavisPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.