hussEyquation
Menu

NBA player comparison

Gene Shue vs. Paul Seymour: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Gene Shue ranks higher in career impact

Gene Shue

1954–55 to 1963–64 · 10 seasons

Impact comparison
#185LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#188
+1.5Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+2.0Leads
+0.5Best 5 average impact+0.7Leads
19.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better14.7Leads
+1,003 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+729 pts
39.3LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better47.6

Career Impact Rank places Gene Shue #185 and Paul Seymour #188. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Paul Seymour had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/gene-shue/paul-seymour/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedGene Shue24.727 · No. 185Paul Seymour24.833 · No. 188

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Gene Shue

24.727 composite · No. 185 all-time

Gene Shue's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 141956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate19.33350%9.667
Best 5No. 141956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate24.00030%7.200
Best 10No. 141956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 361955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 721962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 911963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate39.30020%7.860

9.667 + 7.200 + 7.860= 24.727

Paul Seymour

24.833 composite · No. 188 all-time

Paul Seymour's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 111953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate14.66750%7.333
Best 5No. 111953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 451955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate26.60030%7.980
Best 10No. 111953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 451955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 571951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 82.547.60020%9.520

7.333 + 7.980 + 9.520= 24.833

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 82.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Gene Shue and Paul Seymour
MetricGene ShuePaul Seymour
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#185Better result for this metric.#188
Best 3 average finish19.314.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finish24.0Better result for this metric.26.6
Best 10 average finish39.3Better result for this metric.47.6
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Gene Shue and Paul Seymour
MetricGene ShuePaul Seymour
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#456Better result for this metric.#606
Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+1.5+2.0Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average impact+0.9+1.4Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average impact+0.5+0.7Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average impact-0.6Unavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,003 ptsBetter result for this metric.+729 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Gene Shue and Paul Seymour
MetricGene ShuePaul Seymour
Games699538
Minutes23,33815,870

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Gene Shue and Paul Seymour
MetricGene ShuePaul Seymour
True shooting percentage46.5%Better result for this metric.43.4%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile44.6%Unavailable
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Gene Shue and Paul Seymour
MetricGene ShuePaul Seymour
Field-goal percentage39.6%Better result for this metric.35.3%
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage80.6%Better result for this metric.80.3%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Gene Shue and Paul Seymour
MetricGene ShuePaul Seymour
Assists per game3.74.0Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Gene Shue and Paul Seymour
MetricGene ShuePaul Seymour
Rebounds per game4.1Better result for this metric.3.1

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Gene Shue and Paul Seymour
MetricGene ShuePaul Seymour
Points per game14.4Better result for this metric.9.8

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Gene Shue ranks higher in career impact.

Gene ShueMetricPaul Seymour
#185LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#188
+1.5Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+2.0Leads
+0.5Best 5 average impact+0.7Leads
+1,003 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+729 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Paul Seymour leads every available measure below.

Gene ShueMetricPaul Seymour
354Listed-team regular-season wins398Leads
42.9%Listed-team winning percentage56.1%Leads
050-win team seasons0
060-win team seasons0
8Playoff team seasons10Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Paul Seymour leads every available measure below.

Gene ShueMetricPaul Seymour
7Playoff appearances8Leads
32Playoff games55Leads
12Team playoff wins27Leads
0Finals appearances2Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Gene Shue leads every available measure below.

Gene ShueMetricPaul Seymour
5LeadsAll-Star3
0MVP0
2All-NBA2
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Gene ShuePaul SeymourPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.