hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Grant Long vs. Harrison Barnes: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Grant Long ranks higher in career impact so far

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1060LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1348
+0.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.4
91.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better115.3
+820 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+751 pts
125.7LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better177.7
+0.9Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9

Career Impact Rank places Grant Long #1060 and Harrison Barnes #1348. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Harrison Barnes had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/grant-long/harrison-barnes/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedGrant Long100.433 · No. 1,060Harrison Barnes133.467 · No. 1,348

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Grant Long

100.433 composite · No. 1,060 all-time

Grant Long's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 891991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 901995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 961988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate91.66750%45.833
Best 5No. 891991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 901995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 961988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 981998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1181994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate98.20030%29.460
Best 10No. 891991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 901995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 961988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 981998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1181994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1221990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1281992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1631993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1732000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1801989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate125.70020%25.140

45.833 + 29.460 + 25.140= 100.433

Harrison Barnes

133.467 composite · No. 1,348 all-time

Harrison Barnes's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1092020–21No. 1182024–25No. 1192021–22115.33350%57.667
Best 5No. 1092020–21No. 1182024–25No. 1192021–22No. 1612014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1642017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate134.20030%40.260
Best 10No. 1092020–21No. 1182024–25No. 1192021–22No. 1612014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1642017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1652016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2262025–26No. 2272022–23No. 2402019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2482018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate177.70020%35.540

57.667 + 40.260 + 35.540= 133.467

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Grant Long and Harrison Barnes
MetricGrant LongHarrison Barnes
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1060Better result for this metric.#1348
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better91.7Better result for this metric.115.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better98.2Better result for this metric.134.2
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better125.7Better result for this metric.177.7
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Grant Long and Harrison Barnes
MetricGrant LongHarrison Barnes
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#545Better result for this metric.#590
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9+0.9
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8+0.8
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5Better result for this metric.+0.4
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1Better result for this metric.-0.4
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+820 ptsBetter result for this metric.+751 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Grant Long and Harrison Barnes
MetricGrant LongHarrison Barnes
Games1,0031,070
Minutes28,51433,015

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Grant Long and Harrison Barnes
MetricGrant LongHarrison Barnes
True shooting percentage53.6%57.6%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile53.7%59.8%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Grant Long and Harrison Barnes
MetricGrant LongHarrison Barnes
Field-goal percentage46.7%Better result for this metric.46.0%
Three-point percentage28.3%38.5%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage76.1%81.1%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Grant Long and Harrison Barnes
MetricGrant LongHarrison Barnes
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile9.3%Better result for this metric.8.7%
Assists per game1.71.8Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Grant Long and Harrison Barnes
MetricGrant LongHarrison Barnes
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile15.5%8.4%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Grant Long and Harrison Barnes
MetricGrant LongHarrison Barnes
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.0%Better result for this metric.8.3%
Rebounds per game6.1Better result for this metric.4.6

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Grant Long and Harrison Barnes
MetricGrant LongHarrison Barnes
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.2%Better result for this metric.1.0%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Grant Long and Harrison Barnes
MetricGrant LongHarrison Barnes
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.9%Better result for this metric.0.5%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Grant Long and Harrison Barnes
MetricGrant LongHarrison Barnes
Points per game9.513.6Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Grant Long ranks higher in career impact so far.

Grant LongMetricHarrison Barnes
#1060LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1348
+0.9Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9
+0.5LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.4
+820 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+751 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Grant LongMetricHarrison Barnes
527Listed-team regular-season wins649Leads
41.2%Listed-team winning percentage53.6%Leads
150-win team seasons4Leads
060-win team seasons3Leads
7LeadsPlayoff team seasons6

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Grant LongMetricHarrison Barnes
7LeadsPlayoff appearances6
42Playoff games91Leads
15Team playoff wins56Leads
0Finals appearances3Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Grant LongMetricHarrison Barnes
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Grant LongHarrison BarnesPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.