hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Haywoode Workman vs. Jevon Carter: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Haywoode Workman ranks higher in career impact so far

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1624LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1926
-0.2Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2Leads
-1.0Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.8Leads
141.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better174.3
+112 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+93 pts
229.6LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better283.2

Career Impact Rank places Haywoode Workman #1624 and Jevon Carter #1926. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Jevon Carter had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/haywoode-workman/jevon-carter/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedHaywoode Workman166.280 · No. 1,624Jevon Carter208.727 · No. 1,926

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Haywoode Workman

166.280 composite · No. 1,624 all-time

Haywoode Workman's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1351998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1411994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1471990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate141.00050%70.500
Best 5No. 1351998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1411994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1471990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1711993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2371995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate166.20030%49.860
Best 10No. 1351998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1411994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1471990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1711993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2371995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate5 open slots × No. 293229.60020%45.920

70.500 + 49.860 + 45.920= 166.280

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 293, this player's stored replacement finish.

Jevon Carter

208.727 composite · No. 1,926 all-time

Jevon Carter's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1472019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1602020–21No. 2162022–23174.33350%87.167
Best 5No. 1472019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1602020–21No. 2162022–23No. 2662025–26No. 2932021–22216.40030%64.920
Best 10No. 1472019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1602020–21No. 2162022–23No. 2662025–26No. 2932021–22No. 3042018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3302023–243 open slots × No. 372283.20020%56.640

87.167 + 64.920 + 56.640= 208.727

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 372, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Haywoode Workman and Jevon Carter
MetricHaywoode WorkmanJevon Carter
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1624Better result for this metric.#1926
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better141.0Better result for this metric.174.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better166.2Better result for this metric.216.4
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better229.6Better result for this metric.283.2
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Haywoode Workman and Jevon Carter
MetricHaywoode WorkmanJevon Carter
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1387Better result for this metric.#1446
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.2+0.2Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5-0.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.0-0.8Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+112 ptsBetter result for this metric.+93 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Haywoode Workman and Jevon Carter
MetricHaywoode WorkmanJevon Carter
Games359465
Minutes7,2027,146

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Haywoode Workman and Jevon Carter
MetricHaywoode WorkmanJevon Carter
True shooting percentage49.5%52.7%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile49.7%52.2%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Haywoode Workman and Jevon Carter
MetricHaywoode WorkmanJevon Carter
Field-goal percentage41.9%Better result for this metric.39.5%
Three-point percentage32.3%37.7%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage76.4%79.7%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Haywoode Workman and Jevon Carter
MetricHaywoode WorkmanJevon Carter
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile29.4%Better result for this metric.14.0%
Assists per game3.9Better result for this metric.1.6
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Haywoode Workman and Jevon Carter
MetricHaywoode WorkmanJevon Carter
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile22.1%10.6%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Haywoode Workman and Jevon Carter
MetricHaywoode WorkmanJevon Carter
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.8%Better result for this metric.6.0%
Rebounds per game2.3Better result for this metric.1.7

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Haywoode Workman and Jevon Carter
MetricHaywoode WorkmanJevon Carter
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.6%Better result for this metric.1.9%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Haywoode Workman and Jevon Carter
MetricHaywoode WorkmanJevon Carter
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.2%1.4%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Haywoode Workman and Jevon Carter
MetricHaywoode WorkmanJevon Carter
Points per game5.5Better result for this metric.5.3

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Haywoode Workman ranks higher in career impact so far.

Haywoode WorkmanMetricJevon Carter
#1624LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1926
-0.2Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2Leads
-1.0Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.8Leads
+112 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+93 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Haywoode WorkmanMetricJevon Carter
376Listed-team regular-season wins425Leads
53.3%LeadsListed-team winning percentage53.1%
250-win team seasons3Leads
060-win team seasons0
6LeadsPlayoff team seasons5

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Haywoode WorkmanMetricJevon Carter
4Playoff appearances4
41LeadsPlayoff games25
22Team playoff wins25Leads
0Finals appearances1Leads
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Haywoode WorkmanMetricJevon Carter
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Haywoode WorkmanJevon CarterPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.