hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

Player profile · ATL / IND / MIL / TOR / WSB

Haywoode Workman

Haywoode Workman stats, teams and career impact

#1624 all-timeCareer averages · 5.5 PPG · 2.3 RPG · 3.9 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Position
Point guard
Teams in final NBA season
Milwaukee Bucks and Toronto Raptors
Height / weight
6 ft 2 in (188 cm) · 180 lb (82 kg)
Born
January 23, 1966 (60 yrs old)
College
Winston-Salem State, Oral Roberts
NBA seasons
8 seasons · 1989–90 to 1999–00

Career summaryHaywoode Workman was a point guard who played 8 NBA seasons, from 1989–90 through 1999–00.

Career PPG
5.5
Career RPG
2.3
Career APG
3.9
Best-Season Impact Rank
#135 in 1998–99
Career Impact Rank
#1624 all-time
Peak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Career overview

Why Haywoode Workman ranks #1624 all time

Haywoode Workman ranks #1624 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #141.0. His full-career value ranks #1387, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high.

Peak#135 in 1998–99

Best league finish

Sustained excellence5 ranked seasons

450+ minutes required per season

Career breadth8 seasons

359 games · Career Value Rank #1387

Head to head

Compare Haywoode Workman with…

Choose any two players →

Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.

  1. Haywoode Workman vs. Mike Bratz Similar career path
  2. Haywoode Workman vs. Shammond Williams Similar career path
  3. Haywoode Workman vs. Will Bynum Similar career path
  4. Haywoode Workman vs. Shelvin Mack Similar career path
  5. Haywoode Workman vs. Jevon Carter Similar career path
  6. Haywoode Workman vs. Eldridge Recasner Similar career path
  7. Haywoode Workman vs. Bison Dele Same-era comparison
  8. Haywoode Workman vs. Keith Askins Same-era comparison
  9. Haywoode Workman vs. Jayson Williams Same-era comparison
  10. Haywoode Workman vs. Donald Royal Same-era comparison
Suggested comparisons, not a ranking of search traffic.
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources

Full team history

Teams
Atlanta Hawks, Washington Bullets, Indiana Pacers, Milwaukee Bucks, and Toronto Raptors

Career shooting

NBA regular season
Field goal
41.9%FG%
Three-point
32.3%3P%
Free throw
76.4%FT%

359 career games · 7,202 minutes

Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.

Traditional box score

Haywoode Workman stats by season

Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.

Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.

Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →

pts/100 · higher is better
1999–002.40.71.7-2.86MIL/TOR3629.734.4%32.6%66.7%—-5.8
1998–996.93.55.9-0.25MIL292928.142.9%36.2%78.7%#13525.9
1996–975.51.82.8-7.04IND4220.355.0%0.0%0.0%—-7.6
1995–963.61.62.8-2.37IND77415.139.0%32.4%74.0%#237-8.0
1994–954.21.62.8-0.49IND691414.937.5%35.7%74.3%#14129.1
1993–947.73.16.2-1.22IND655226.442.4%32.1%80.2%#17126.1
1990–918.03.34.8-0.68WSB735627.945.4%24.0%75.9%#14754.6
1989–901.00.50.3-10.53ATL602.766.7%—100.0%—-2.7
Career5.52.33.9—ATL/IND/MIL/TOR/WSB359—20.141.9%32.3%76.4%——

Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.

What these measures mean
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
Impact Rate
A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
Impact estimate
The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
Impact Rate rank
The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
Value contribution / Season Value
Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
Career Impact Rank
An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
Best 5#1582

166.2 average league finish

Career Value Rank#1387

112 total value

Impact Rate
0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.

Career standing

How Haywoode Workman ranks all time

These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.

Number-one seasons0

Best in the league

Top-five seasons0

Elite finishes

Top-ten seasons0

Upper-tier finishes

Top-10 Impact Margin0.0

Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons

Career Composite Score166.3

Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.

Best 3 effective weight
74%
Missing-season finish
293.0
Qualified seasons
5
All-time rank
#1624
Strongest seasons

Every season

Haywoode Workman advanced stats by season

Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.

More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
pts/100 · higher is better0–100 · higher is better
1999–00Historical Defense EstimateMIL/TOR3436350-2.86——-5.8—Limited
1998–99Historical Defense EstimateMIL3329815-0.2551.4#13525.946thStandard
1996–97Historical Defense EstimateIND31481-7.04——-7.6—Limited
1995–96Historical Defense EstimateIND30771,164-2.3727.4#237-8.027thBroad
1994–95Historical Defense EstimateIND29691,028-0.4954.7#14129.147thBroad
1993–94Historical Defense EstimateIND28651,714-1.2241.6#17126.144thBroad
1990–91Historical Defense EstimateWSB25732,034-0.6849.8#14754.655thBroad
1989–90Historical Defense EstimateATL24616-10.53——-2.7—Limited

Career movement

Haywoode Workman's box impact by season

Peak box impact -0.25 points per 100 possessions in 1998–99 · 8 seasons · 7,202 minutes

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.

Box impact · points per 100 possessionsMinutes
—’92
—’93
—’98
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload

Career comparison

Compare the shape, not the calendar

Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.

Open full comparison →
Haywoode WorkmanMike Bratz
Box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better · dashed marker means the player did not play
Haywoode Workman and Mike Bratz era-centered impact values by NBA season number
NBA seasonHaywoode WorkmanMike Bratz
1-10.5-3.2
2-0.7-2.1
3-1.2-2.3
4-0.5-0.8
5-2.40.1
6-7.0-7.7
7-0.2-0.7
8-2.9-1.2
9Did not play-5.6

NBA season number

Similar career arcs

Players with careers similar to Haywoode Workman

The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.

How to read this page

Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →