Jason Kidd
1994–95 to 2012–13 · 19 seasons
NBA player comparison
Jason Kidd vs. Tim Duncan: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Tim Duncan ranks higher in career impact
Tim Duncan
1997–98 to 2015–16 · 19 seasons
Impact comparison
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.
#44Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#30Leads
+6.8Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+7.7Leads
+6.4Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+7.0Leads
5.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better3.3Leads
+6,267 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+6,394 ptsLeads
8Top-10 impact seasons10Leads
Career Impact Rank places Tim Duncan #30 and Jason Kidd #44. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJason Kidd6.120 · No. 44Tim Duncan4.067 · No. 30
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Jason Kidd
6.120 composite · No. 44 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 31998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 52002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 72003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 5.000 | 50% | 2.500 |
| Best 5No. 31998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 52002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 72003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 82004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 6.400 | 30% | 1.920 |
| Best 10No. 31998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 52002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 72003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 82004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 92009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 102005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 122008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 132000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 8.500 | 20% | 1.700 |
2.500 + 1.920 + 1.700= 6.120
Tim Duncan
4.067 composite · No. 30 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 22003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 42004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 42012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 3.333 | 50% | 1.667 |
| Best 5No. 22003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 42004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 42012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 52001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 62002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 4.200 | 30% | 1.260 |
| Best 10No. 22003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 42004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 42012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 52001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 62002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 62006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 62008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 62009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 82007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 102014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 5.700 | 20% | 1.140 |
1.667 + 1.260 + 1.140= 4.067
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Jason Kidd | Tim Duncan |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #44 | #30Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 5.0 | 3.3Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 6.4 | 4.2Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 8.5 | 5.7Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Jason Kidd | Tim Duncan |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #17 | #15Better result for this metric. |
| Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +6.8 | +7.7Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +6.7 | +7.2Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +6.4 | +7.0Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +5.7 | +6.1Better result for this metric. |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +6,267 pts | +6,394 ptsBetter result for this metric. |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 2 | 4Better result for this metric. |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 8 | 10Better result for this metric. |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Jason Kidd | Tim Duncan |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1,391 | 1,392 |
| Minutes | 50,111 | 47,368 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Jason Kidd | Tim Duncan |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 50.7% | 55.1%Better result for this metric. |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 51.6% | 55.6%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Jason Kidd | Tim Duncan |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 40.0% | 50.6%Better result for this metric. |
| Three-point percentage | 34.9%Better result for this metric. | 17.9% |
| Free-throw percentage | 78.5%Better result for this metric. | 69.6% |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Jason Kidd | Tim Duncan |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 41.2%Better result for this metric. | 17.5% |
| Assists per game | 8.7Better result for this metric. | 3.0 |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Jason Kidd | Tim Duncan |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 17.5% | 11.8%Better result for this metric. |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Jason Kidd | Tim Duncan |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 10.5% | 18.8%Better result for this metric. |
| Rebounds per game | 6.3 | 10.8Better result for this metric. |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Jason Kidd | Tim Duncan |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 2.8%Better result for this metric. | 1.1% |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Jason Kidd | Tim Duncan |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 0.6% | 4.6%Better result for this metric. |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Jason Kidd | Tim Duncan |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 12.6 | 19.0Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Tim Duncan ranks higher in career impact.
Jason KiddMetricTim Duncan
#44Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#30Leads
+6.8Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+7.7Leads
+6.4Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+7.0Leads
+6,267 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+6,394 ptsLeads
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
Tim Duncan leads every available measure below.
Jason KiddMetricTim Duncan
930Listed-team regular-season wins1,072Leads
55.6%Listed-team winning percentage71.0%Leads
950-win team seasons18Leads
060-win team seasons5Leads
17Playoff team seasons19Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Tim Duncan leads every available measure below.
Jason KiddMetricTim Duncan
17Playoff appearances18Leads
158Playoff games251Leads
81Team playoff wins157Leads
3Finals appearances6Leads
1Championships5Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
Tim Duncan leads every available measure below.
Jason KiddMetricTim Duncan
10All-Star15Leads
0MVP2Leads
6All-NBA15Leads
9All-Defense15Leads
0DPOY0
1Rookie of the Year1
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Jason KiddTim DuncanPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Jason KiddNBA seasonTim Duncan
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Season 8
Season 9
Season 10
Season 11
Season 12
Season 13
Season 14
Season 15
Season 16
Season 17
Season 18
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.