Best league finish
Menu
Player profile · SAS

Tim Duncan
Tim Duncan stats, teams and career impact
#30 all-timeCareer averages · 19.0 PPG · 10.8 RPG · 3.0 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
- Position
- Power forward
- Final NBA team
- San Antonio Spurs
- Height / weight
- 6 ft 11 in (211 cm) · 250 lb (113 kg)
- Born
- April 25, 1976 (50 yrs old)
- College
- Wake Forest
- NBA seasons
- 19 seasons · 1997–98 to 2015–16
Career summaryTim Duncan was a power forward who played 19 NBA seasons, from 1997–98 through 2015–16.
- Career PPG
- 19.0
- Career RPG
- 10.8
- Career APG
- 3.0
- #2 in 2003–04
- #30 all-time
Career overview
Why Tim Duncan ranks #30 all time
Tim Duncan ranks #30 all time. 4 top-five finishes and 10 top-ten finishes give him a strong blend of peak and staying power. His full-career value ranks #15, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high.
10 top-ten finishes
1,392 games · Career Value Rank #15
NBA honors15× All-Star · 2× MVP · 15× All-NBA · 15× All-Defense · ROYContext only; honors are not model inputs.
Head to head
Compare Tim Duncan with…
Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.
- Tim Duncan vs. Kevin Garnett Featured comparison
- Tim Duncan vs. Shaquille O'Neal Featured comparison
- Tim Duncan vs. Karl Malone All-time forwards
- Tim Duncan vs. Charles Barkley All-time forwards
- Tim Duncan vs. Chris Webber All-time forwards
- Tim Duncan vs. Hakeem Olajuwon Similar career path
- Tim Duncan vs. Dirk Nowitzki Similar career path
- Tim Duncan vs. Scottie Pippen Similar career path
- Tim Duncan vs. Kobe Bryant Similar career path
- Tim Duncan vs. Paul Pierce Same-era comparison
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources
Full team history
- Teams
- San Antonio Spurs
Career shooting
NBA regular season- Field goal
- 50.6%FG%
- Three-point
- 17.9%3P%
- Free throw
- 69.6%FT%
1,392 career games · 47,368 minutes
Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.
Traditional box score
Tim Duncan stats by season
Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.
Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →
| 2015–16 | 8.6 | 7.3 | 2.7 | +2.38 | SAS | 61 | 60 | 25.2 | 48.8% | 0.0% | 70.2% | #42 | 131.3 |
| 2014–15 | 13.9 | 9.1 | 3.0 | +4.99 | SAS | 77 | 77 | 28.9 | 51.2% | 28.6% | 74.0% | #10 | 304.2 |
| 2013–14 | 15.1 | 9.7 | 3.0 | +3.05 | SAS | 74 | 74 | 29.2 | 49.0% | 0.0% | 73.1% | #27 | 215.9 |
| 2012–13 | 17.8 | 9.9 | 2.7 | +4.87 | SAS | 69 | 69 | 30.1 | 50.2% | 28.6% | 81.7% | #4 | 280.2 |
| 2011–12 | 15.4 | 9.0 | 2.3 | +2.89 | SAS | 58 | 58 | 28.2 | 49.2% | 0.0% | 69.5% | #37 | 154.8 |
| 2010–11 | 13.4 | 8.9 | 2.7 | +3.95 | SAS | 76 | 76 | 28.4 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 71.6% | #16 | 246.5 |
| 2009–10 | 17.9 | 10.1 | 3.2 | +5.76 | SAS | 78 | 77 | 31.3 | 51.8% | 18.2% | 72.5% | #6 | 361.6 |
| 2008–09 | 19.3 | 10.7 | 3.5 | +5.67 | SAS | 75 | 75 | 33.7 | 50.4% | 0.0% | 69.2% | #6 | 356.4 |
| 2007–08 | 19.3 | 11.3 | 2.8 | +5.06 | SAS | 78 | 78 | 34.0 | 49.7% | 0.0% | 73.0% | #8 | 346.4 |
| 2006–07 | 20.0 | 10.6 | 3.4 | +6.47 | SAS | 80 | 80 | 34.1 | 54.6% | 11.1% | 63.7% | #6 | 431.7 |
| 2005–06 | 18.6 | 11.0 | 3.2 | +4.34 | SAS | 80 | 80 | 34.8 | 48.4% | 40.0% | 62.9% | #24 | 325.3 |
| 2004–05 | 20.3 | 11.1 | 2.7 | +7.31 | SAS | 66 | 66 | 33.4 | 49.6% | 33.3% | 67.0% | #4 | 379.7 |
| 2003–04 | 22.3 | 12.4 | 3.1 | +7.71 | SAS | 69 | 68 | 36.6 | 50.1% | 16.7% | 59.9% | #2 | 455.8 |
| 2002–03 | 23.3 | 12.9 | 3.9 | +6.67 | SAS | 81 | 81 | 39.3 | 51.3% | 27.3% | 71.0% | #6 | 517.1 |
| 2001–02 | 25.5 | 12.7 | 3.7 | +6.67 | SAS | 82 | 82 | 40.6 | 50.8% | 10.0% | 79.9% | #5 | 541.2 |
| 2000–01 | 22.2 | 12.2 | 3.0 | +4.02 | SAS | 82 | 82 | 38.7 | 49.9% | 25.9% | 61.8% | #20 | 356.8 |
| 1999–00 | 23.2 | 12.4 | 3.2 | +5.13 | SAS | 74 | 74 | 38.9 | 49.0% | 9.1% | 76.1% | #12 | 387.8 |
| 1998–99 | 21.7 | 11.4 | 2.4 | +4.36 | SAS | 50 | 50 | 39.3 | 49.5% | 14.3% | 69.0% | #14 | 230.5 |
| 1997–98 | 21.1 | 11.9 | 2.7 | +4.28 | SAS | 82 | 82 | 39.1 | 54.9% | 0.0% | 66.2% | #12 | 370.5 |
| Career | 19.0 | 10.8 | 3.0 | — | SAS | 1392 | — | 34.0 | 50.6% | 17.9% | 69.6% | — | — |
Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.
Film evidence
Tim Duncan highlights
Watch the selected footage or film analysis, then use the season record and impact data to put what happened on the floor in context.
Tim Duncan Hall of Fame career retrospective
Duncan's positioning, rim protection and economical offense are easier to recognize on film than in a single headline statistic.
What these measures mean
- Era-centered box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average.
- Impact Rate Rank
- The player's place among qualified players in one season.
- Value contribution / Season Value
- Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
- Career Impact Rank
- An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
4.1 composite · lower is better
4.2 average league finish
6,394 total value
Career standing
How Tim Duncan ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons
Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.
- Best 3 effective weight
- 74%
- Missing-season finish
- 335.0
- Qualified seasons
- 19
- All-time rank
- #30
Every season
Tim Duncan advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
Scroll for more columns
| 2015–16Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 39 | 61 | 1,536 | +2.38 | 88.7 | #42 | 131.3 | 82nd | Broad |
| 2014–15Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 38 | 77 | 2,227 | +4.99 | 97.6 | #10 | 304.2 | 97th | Broad |
| 2013–14Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 37 | 74 | 2,158 | +3.05 | 92.5 | #27 | 215.9 | 92nd | Broad |
| 2012–13Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 36 | 69 | 2,078 | +4.87 | 99.1 | #4 | 280.2 | 97th | Broad |
| 2011–12Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 35 | 58 | 1,634 | +2.89 | 89.5 | #37 | 154.8 | 87th | Broad |
| 2010–11Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 34 | 76 | 2,156 | +3.95 | 95.7 | #16 | 246.5 | 93rd | Broad |
| 2009–10Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 33 | 78 | 2,438 | +5.76 | 98.5 | #6 | 361.6 | 98th | Broad |
| 2008–09Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 32 | 75 | 2,524 | +5.67 | 98.5 | #6 | 356.4 | 98th | Broad |
| 2007–08Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 31 | 78 | 2,651 | +5.06 | 97.9 | #8 | 346.4 | 97th | Broad |
| 2006–07Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 30 | 80 | 2,726 | +6.47 | 98.5 | #6 | 431.7 | 99th | Broad |
| 2005–06Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 29 | 80 | 2,784 | +4.34 | 93.0 | #24 | 325.3 | 94th | Broad |
| 2004–05Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 28 | 66 | 2,203 | +7.31 | 99.1 | #4 | 379.7 | 98th | Broad |
| 2003–04Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 27 | 69 | 2,527 | +7.71 | 99.7 | #2 | 455.8 | 99th | Broad |
| 2002–03Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 26 | 81 | 3,181 | +6.67 | 98.4 | #6 | 517.1 | 99th | Broad |
| 2001–02Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 25 | 82 | 3,329 | +6.67 | 98.8 | #5 | 541.2 | 100th | Broad |
| 2000–01Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 24 | 82 | 3,174 | +4.02 | 94.2 | #20 | 356.8 | 95th | Broad |
| 1999–00Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 23 | 74 | 2,875 | +5.13 | 96.6 | #12 | 387.8 | 98th | Broad |
| 1998–99Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 22 | 50 | 1,963 | +4.36 | 95.3 | #14 | 230.5 | 97th | Broad |
| 1997–98Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 21 | 82 | 3,204 | +4.28 | 96.5 | #12 | 370.5 | 98th | Broad |
Career movement
Tim Duncan's career impact by season
Peak +7.71 in 2003–04 · 19 seasons · 47,368 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. The vertical scale adapts to this player's range and always includes zero.
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
| NBA season | Tim Duncan | Hakeem Olajuwon |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.3 | 2.3 |
| 2 | 4.4 | 5.2 |
| 3 | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| 4 | 4.0 | 4.9 |
| 5 | 6.7 | 5.7 |
| 6 | 6.7 | 6.3 |
| 7 | 7.7 | 6.1 |
| 8 | 7.3 | 5.6 |
| 9 | 4.3 | 7.9 |
| 10 | 6.5 | 6.6 |
| 11 | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| 12 | 5.7 | 5.8 |
| 13 | 5.8 | 3.4 |
| 14 | 3.9 | 3.1 |
| 15 | 2.9 | 3.3 |
| 16 | 4.9 | 0.3 |
| 17 | 3.1 | 2.2 |
| 18 | 5.0 | 0.9 |
| 19 | 2.4 | Did not play |
NBA season number
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Tim Duncan
The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.
Hakeem Olajuwon
92career similarity score
88/100 closest-season score · 2003–04 ↔ 1986–87PF · All-Time Career #23Karl Malone
92career similarity score
90/100 closest-season score · 2003–04 ↔ 1992–93PF · All-Time Career #42Dirk Nowitzki
89career similarity score
94/100 closest-season score · 2003–04 ↔ 2006–07Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →