hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Jeff Green vs. Kurt Thomas: 2010–11 season

hussEyquation2010–11 season · regular-season impact
Regular-season verdict

Kurt Thomas leads in impact for 2010–11

Kurt Thomas ranks ahead of Jeff Green in estimated impact while playing. This compares regular-season performance, not total contribution across the season.

Impact comparison

Impact estimate is measured in points per 100 possessions above league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Impact Rate rank is a league place, not a 0–100 score: No. 1 is best.

-2.3Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5Leads
#264Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#167Leads
75Games52
2,427Minutes1,178
13.3LeadsPPG4.1
53.8%LeadsTS%52.7%

Kurt Thomas's estimated impact per 100 possessions was -0.5, compared with -2.3 for Jeff Green. This compares their impact while playing, not their total contribution across the season. Both players are compared in the 2010–11 season using its published Impact Rate. A ranked comparison requires at least 450 minutes for each player.

Jeff Green: 75 games and 2,427 minutes. Kurt Thomas: 52 games and 1,178 minutes. Playing time matters when judging the whole season; the impact estimate above is a rate, not a season total.

Read turnover rate alongside offensive workload. Offensive usage measures the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on the court—not every touch, pass, or act of playmaking. These rows provide context; they are not extra points added to the ranking.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

2010–11 season · regular-season impacthusseyquation.com/compare/jeff-green/kurt-thomas/2010-11

Behind the estimate

Why the model rates them this way

A verified breakdown of this season’s published estimate is unavailable. We do not substitute another season’s calculation.

What this does not establish: these figures do not prove that either player made his teammates shoot better. A verified teammate-shooting comparison is unavailable for this selected season. A small difference in the estimates is not a decisive basketball distinction.

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · 2010–11 season

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

The impact estimate compares performance while playing, not total contribution over the season. The individual-stat estimate plus the lineup adjustment gives the final estimate.

Impact: Jeff Green and Kurt Thomas
MetricJeff GreenKurt Thomas
Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.3-0.5Better result for this metric.
Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#264#167Better result for this metric.

Jeff Green: verified lineup window unavailable. Kurt Thomas: verified lineup window unavailable. The adjustment is not necessarily based on this season alone.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Jeff Green and Kurt Thomas
MetricJeff GreenKurt Thomas
Games7552
Minutes2,4271,178

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These figures describe the selected regular seasons. They provide context, not extra points added to the verdict. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Jeff Green and Kurt Thomas
MetricJeff GreenKurt Thomas
True shooting percentage53.8%Better result for this metric.52.7%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Jeff Green and Kurt Thomas
MetricJeff GreenKurt Thomas
Field-goal percentage44.9%51.1%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage30.3%100.0%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage81.1%Better result for this metric.62.5%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Jeff Green and Kurt Thomas
MetricJeff GreenKurt Thomas
Assists per game1.4Better result for this metric.1.2

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Jeff Green and Kurt Thomas
MetricJeff GreenKurt Thomas
Rebounds per game4.85.8Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Jeff Green and Kurt Thomas
MetricJeff GreenKurt Thomas
Points per game13.3Better result for this metric.4.1

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Kurt Thomas leads in impact for 2010–11.

Jeff GreenMetricKurt Thomas
-2.3Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5Leads
#264Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#167Leads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Jeff GreenMetricKurt Thomas
953LeadsListed-team regular-season wins822
53.8%Listed-team winning percentage54.4%Leads
9Leads50-win team seasons8
060-win team seasons3Leads
16LeadsPlayoff team seasons13

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Jeff Green leads every available measure below.

Jeff GreenMetricKurt Thomas
12LeadsPlayoff appearances11
108LeadsPlayoff games96
63LeadsTeam playoff wins61
2LeadsFinals appearances1
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Jeff GreenMetricKurt Thomas
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Selected seasons

Box impact

Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.

Jeff GreenKurt Thomas

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

1
Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.