Jonathan Kuminga
2021–22 to 2025–26 · 5 seasons · active
NBA player comparison
Jonathan Kuminga vs. Justin Champagnie: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Jonathan Kuminga ranks higher in career impact so far
Justin Champagnie
2021–22 to 2025–26 · 5 seasons · active
Impact comparison
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.
#2304LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#2400
-0.6Peak box impact so farEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5Leads
-1.3Average box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.4Leads
#194Best league finish#93Leads
+104 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+182 ptsLeads
294LeadsGames187
Career Impact Rank places Jonathan Kuminga #2304 and Justin Champagnie #2400. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Justin Champagnie had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJonathan Kuminga249.347 · No. 2,304Justin Champagnie259.307 · No. 2,400
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Jonathan Kuminga
249.347 composite · No. 2,304 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 1942023–24No. 2382024–25No. 2442025–26 | 225.333 | 50% | 112.667 |
| Best 5No. 1942023–24No. 2382024–25No. 2442025–26No. 2692022–23No. 2812021–22 | 245.200 | 30% | 73.560 |
| Best 10No. 1942023–24No. 2382024–25No. 2442025–26No. 2692022–23No. 2812021–225 open slots × No. 386 | 315.600 | 20% | 63.120 |
112.667 + 73.560 + 63.120= 249.347
Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 386, this player's stored replacement finish.
Justin Champagnie
259.307 composite · No. 2,400 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 932024–25No. 1512025–261 open slot × No. 393 | 212.333 | 50% | 106.167 |
| Best 5No. 932024–25No. 1512025–263 open slots × No. 393 | 284.600 | 30% | 85.380 |
| Best 10No. 932024–25No. 1512025–268 open slots × No. 393 | 338.800 | 20% | 67.760 |
106.167 + 85.380 + 67.760= 259.307
Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 393, this player's stored replacement finish.
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Jonathan Kuminga | Justin Champagnie |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank | #2304Better result for this metric. | #2400 |
| Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 225.3 | 212.3Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 245.2Better result for this metric. | 284.6 |
| Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 315.6Better result for this metric. | 338.8 |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Jonathan Kuminga | Justin Champagnie |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #1405 | #1224Better result for this metric. |
| Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | -0.6 | +1.5Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | -1.0 | Unavailable |
| Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | -1.3 | Unavailable |
| Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +104 pts | +182 ptsBetter result for this metric. |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Jonathan Kuminga | Justin Champagnie |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 294 | 187 |
| Minutes | 6,502 | 3,267 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Jonathan Kuminga | Justin Champagnie |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 58.0% | 59.0%Better result for this metric. |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 57.7% | 60.1%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Jonathan Kuminga | Justin Champagnie |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 50.2%Better result for this metric. | 49.4% |
| Three-point percentage | 33.2% | 34.6%Better result for this metric. |
| Free-throw percentage | 69.9% | 75.9%Better result for this metric. |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Jonathan Kuminga | Justin Champagnie |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 12.6%Better result for this metric. | 7.8% |
| Assists per game | 1.8Better result for this metric. | 1.0 |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Jonathan Kuminga | Justin Champagnie |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 12.3% | 9.6%Better result for this metric. |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Jonathan Kuminga | Justin Champagnie |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 10.7% | 14.3%Better result for this metric. |
| Rebounds per game | 4.2 | 4.6Better result for this metric. |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Jonathan Kuminga | Justin Champagnie |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 1.4% | 2.1%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Jonathan Kuminga | Justin Champagnie |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 1.7% | 2.7%Better result for this metric. |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Jonathan Kuminga | Justin Champagnie |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 12.5Better result for this metric. | 7.1 |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.
Regular Season Impact
Jonathan Kuminga ranks higher in career impact so far.
Jonathan KumingaMetricJustin Champagnie
#2304LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#2400
-0.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5Leads
-1.3Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
+104 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+182 ptsLeads
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
Jonathan Kuminga leads every available measure below.
Jonathan KumingaMetricJustin Champagnie
274LeadsListed-team regular-season wins196
55.7%LeadsListed-team winning percentage39.8%
150-win team seasons1
060-win team seasons0
4LeadsPlayoff team seasons2
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Jonathan Kuminga leads every available measure below.
Jonathan KumingaMetricJustin Champagnie
4LeadsPlayoff appearances1
40LeadsPlayoff games4
29LeadsTeam playoff wins11
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
No recorded measure separates these careers.
Jonathan KumingaMetricJustin Champagnie
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Jonathan KumingaJustin ChampagniePeak season
Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Jonathan KumingaNBA seasonJustin Champagnie
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.