50.7 score · 89% MPG role factor
Explore rankings
Player profile · BOS / TOR / WAS
Justin Champagnie
Justin Champagnie advanced stats and career rankings
RoleSF · Age 24
Availability69 games · 19 starts
Workload20.0 MPG · 1,377 minutes
Relative impactWAS #1 of 11 · SF #24 of 68
UpdatedJul 21, 2026
20.2 total value · 395 qualified players
66.0 all-time composite · 5 seasons
Low ranking precision · Likely rank #54–#332
Bottom line · 2025–26
In 2025–26, Justin Champagnie ranked 151st in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 102nd, led by rebounding and shot blocking. After adjusting for teammates and opponents, his on-court impact was weaker than the box score indicated, lowering his overall rating. Over about 1,400 minutes, he finished in the 64th percentile for total season value.
2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Justin Champagnie's impact
395 qualified NBA playersEvery player in the comparison logged at least 450 minutes.
Compare with
Overall value
Impact Rate
62
50.7Season Value
64
20.2Scoring role
Usage
36
16.7%True shooting
60
58.9%3-point attempt rate
34
35.9%Free-throw rate
41
22.1%Creation and control
Assist rate
23
8.7%Turnover avoidance
92
8.2%Possession stats
Rebound rate
86
15.0%Steal rate
75
2.0%Block rate
79
2.7%Lineup signal
Offensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
63
+0.60Defensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
26
−0.87Workload
Minutes per game
34
20.0Games played
68
69Total minutes
51
1,377Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.
Every season
Justin Champagnie advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26live model | WAS | 24 | 69 | 1,377 | +1.35 | 50.7 | #151 | 20.2 | 64th | Established |
| 2024–25 | WAS | 23 | 62 | 1,340 | +1.48 | 76.3 | #93 | 98.1 | 75th | Strong |
| 2023–24 | WAS | 22 | 15 | 235 | -2.40 | — | — | -2.0 | — | Limited |
| 2022–23 | BOS/TOR | 21 | 5 | 34 | -11.21 | — | — | -6.4 | — | Limited |
| 2021–22 | TOR | 20 | 36 | 281 | -2.89 | — | — | -5.0 | — | Limited |
Career movement
Justin Champagnie's career impact by season
Peak +1.48 in 2024–25 · 5 seasons · 3,267 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Justin ChampagnieNeemias Queta
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Justin Champagnie
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
C · All-Time Career #1306
Neemias Queta
87%career match
83% season match · 2024–25 ↔ 2025–26SG · All-Time Career #2028Isaiah Joe
85%career match
94% season match · 2024–25 ↔ 2022–23PF · All-Time Career #1715Sam Hauser
82%career match
93% season match · 2024–25 ↔ 2022–23SF · All-Time Career #2014Julian Wright
82%career match
91% season match · 2024–25 ↔ 2010–11PF · All-Time Career #1344Santi Aldama
82%career match
92% season match · 2024–25 ↔ 2023–24SG · All-Time Career #2199Javonte Green
82%career match
86% season match · 2024–25 ↔ 2021–22Why this rank?
Why Justin Champagnie ranks #151
The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.
Prior rank #102
Current total -0.29 ±1.0
Split model · O +0.60 · D -0.87 = -0.27
Maximum ±0.75
Before the within-season scale
54.0 unadjusted · 89% role factor · rank #151
RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.
What the point estimate meansLow precision
The model's 80% impact interval is -1.49 to +3.00. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.
- Top 25 chance
- 1%
- Top 50 chance
- 9%
- Top 100 chance
- 25%
- 80% rank range
- #54–#332
Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →