Best league finish
Menu
Player profile · BOS / TOR / WAS
Justin Champagnie
Justin Champagnie stats, teams and career impact
#2400 all-timeCareer averages · 7.1 PPG · 4.6 RPG · 1.0 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
- Position
- Small forward
- 2025–26 team
- Washington Wizards
- Height / weight
- 6 ft 6 in (198 cm) · 206 lb (93 kg)
- Born
- June 29, 2001 (25 yrs old)
- College
- Pitt
- NBA seasons
- 5 seasons · 2021–22 to 2025–26
Selected season2025–26 · WAS · 69 games · 1,377 minutes
- PPG
- 8.7
- RPG
- 5.6
- APG
- 1.2
- #151 of 395 69 games · 1,377 minutes
- 64th percentile
Impact Rate Rank
Season Value percentile
Career overview
Why Justin Champagnie currently ranks #2400 all time
Justin Champagnie ranks #2400 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #212.3. His full-career value already ranks #1224 after 5 seasons, and his all-time position can still rise.
450+ minutes required per season
187 games · Career Value Rank #1224
Head to head
Compare Justin Champagnie with…
Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Two active players open in the latest published season; switch to Career to compare their full careers.
- Justin Champagnie vs. Neemias Queta Similar career path
- Justin Champagnie vs. Isaiah Joe Similar career path
- Justin Champagnie vs. Sam Hauser Similar career path
- Justin Champagnie vs. Santi Aldama Similar career path
- Justin Champagnie vs. Javonte Green Similar career path
- Justin Champagnie vs. Terrence Jones Similar career path
- Justin Champagnie vs. Vít Krejčí Same-era comparison
- Justin Champagnie vs. Jeremiah Robinson-Earl Same-era comparison
- Justin Champagnie vs. Corey Kispert Same-era comparison
- Justin Champagnie vs. Jonathan Kuminga Same-era comparison
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources
Full team history
- Teams
- Toronto Raptors, Boston Celtics, and Washington Wizards
Career shooting
NBA regular season- Field goal
- 49.4%FG%
- Three-point
- 34.6%3P%
- Free throw
- 75.9%FT%
187 career games · 3,267 minutes
Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.
Traditional box score
Justin Champagnie stats by season
Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.
Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.
Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →
| pts/100 · higher is better | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 8.7 | 5.6 | 1.2 | +1.35 | WAS | 69 | 19 | 20.0 | 50.2% | 31.9% | 78.4% | #151 | 20.2 |
| 2024–25 | 8.8 | 5.7 | 1.0 | +1.48 | WAS | 62 | 31 | 21.6 | 51.1% | 38.3% | 68.5% | #93 | 98.1 |
| 2023–24 | 5.9 | 3.5 | 1.3 | -2.40 | WAS | 15 | 1 | 15.7 | 41.0% | 28.9% | 80.0% | — | -2.0 |
| 2022–23 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 0.8 | -11.21 | BOS/TOR | 5 | 0 | 6.8 | 33.3% | 20.0% | — | — | -6.4 |
| 2021–22 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 0.3 | -2.89 | TOR | 36 | 0 | 7.8 | 46.3% | 35.7% | 100.0% | — | -5.0 |
| Career | 7.1 | 4.6 | 1.0 | — | BOS/TOR/WAS | 187 | — | 17.5 | 49.4% | 34.6% | 75.9% | — | — |
Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.
RoleSF · Age 24
Availability69 games · 19 starts
Workload20.0 MPG · 1,377 minutes
Relative impactWAS #1 of 11 · SF #24 of 68
UpdatedOct 6, 2026
What these measures mean
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
- Impact Rate
- A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
- Impact estimate
- The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
- Impact Rate rank
- The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
- Value contribution / Season Value
- Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
- Career Impact Rank
- An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
69 games · 1,377 minutes · 50.7 / 100 · higher score is better · No. 1 is the best rank
20.2 total value · 395 qualified players
Career Composite 259.3 · lower is better · 5 seasons
Ranking certainty: Wide, likely #54–#332
- Impact Rate
- 0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.
- Impact estimate
- The live model's final estimate in points per 100 possessions, including lineup evidence. It can differ from box impact. Higher is better.
Bottom line · 2025–26
In 2025–26, Justin Champagnie ranked 151st in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 102nd, led by rebounding and shot blocking. After adjusting for teammates and opponents, his on-court impact was weaker than the box score indicated, lowering his overall rating. Over about 1,400 minutes, he finished in the 64th percentile for total season value.
2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Justin Champagnie's impact
395 qualified NBA playersEvery player in the comparison logged at least 450 minutes.
Compare with
Overall value
Impact Rate
0–100 score · higher is better
50.7 / 100Season Value
64
20.2Scoring role
Usage
36
16.7%True shooting
60
58.9%3-point attempt rate
34
35.9%Free-throw rate
41
22.1%Creation and control
Assist rate
23
8.7%Turnover avoidance
92
8.2%Possession stats
Rebound rate
86
15.0%Steal rate
75
2.0%Block rate
79
2.7%Lineup signal
Offensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
63
+0.60 pts/100Defensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
26
−0.87 pts/100Workload
Minutes per game
34
20.0Games played
68
69Total minutes
51
1,377A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession. The other bars show percentiles in the selected comparison group. Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup figures are points per 100 possessions; higher is better. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.
Ranking editions
How the ranking changed
Both editions use the source snapshot dated Jul 14, 2026. These are model-version changes, not results from new games. Each edition keeps its original published numbers.
50.7 Impact Rate · 1,377 MP
Ranking edition: Jul 21, 2026
First snapshot50.7 Impact Rate · 1,377 MP
Ranking edition: Oct 6, 2026
No rank changeEvery season
Justin Champagnie advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
Career movement
Justin Champagnie's box impact by season
Peak box impact +1.48 points per 100 possessions in 2024–25 · 5 seasons · 3,267 minutes
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.
Box impact · points per 100 possessionsMinutes
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Justin ChampagnieNeemias Queta
| NBA season | Justin Champagnie | Neemias Queta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | -2.9 | -8.4 |
| 2 | -11.2 | -11.4 |
| 3 | -2.4 | 0.0 |
| 4 | 1.5 | -1.1 |
| 5 | 1.3 | 1.8 |
NBA season number
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Justin Champagnie
The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.
C · All-Time Career #2467
Neemias Queta
87career similarity score
83/100 closest-season score · 2024–25 ↔ 2025–26SG · All-Time Career #1469Isaiah Joe
85career similarity score
94/100 closest-season score · 2024–25 ↔ 2022–23PF · All-Time Career #1621Sam Hauser
82career similarity score
93/100 closest-season score · 2024–25 ↔ 2022–23Why this rank?
Why Justin Champagnie ranks #151
The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.
Steps 1–4 use points per 100 possessions. Step 5 converts the final estimate to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Higher is better on both scales; they are not the same number.
Prior rank #102
Current total -0.29 ±1.0
Split model · O +0.60 · D -0.87 = -0.27
Maximum ±1.25
Points per 100 possessions · higher is better
Higher is better · 54.0 before the MPG adjustment · rank #151
RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.
Ranking certaintyWide
The model's 80% impact interval is -1.49 to +3.00. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.
- Top 25 chance
- 1%
- Top 50 chance
- 9%
- Top 100 chance
- 25%
- 80% rank range
- #54–#332
Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →