hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Josh Smith vs. Rudy Gobert: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Josh Smith ranks higher in career impact so far

Illustrated portrait of NBA player Rudy Gobert

Rudy Gobert

2013–14 to 2025–26 · 13 seasons · active

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#178LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#209
+3.9LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.8
13.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better19.7
+2,309 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,352 ptsLeads
1LeadsTop-10 impact seasons0
51.0Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better48.7Leads

Career Impact Rank places Josh Smith #178 and Rudy Gobert #209. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Rudy Gobert had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/josh-smith/rudy-gobert/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJosh Smith22.687 · No. 178Rudy Gobert27.613 · No. 209

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Josh Smith

22.687 composite · No. 178 all-time

Josh Smith's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 72009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 122011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate13.33350%6.667
Best 5No. 72009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 122011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 272007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 302006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate19.40030%5.820
Best 10No. 72009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 122011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 272007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 302006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 482012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 562008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 932005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1052004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1112014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate51.00020%10.200

6.667 + 5.820 + 10.200= 22.687

Rudy Gobert

27.613 composite · No. 209 all-time

Rudy Gobert's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 162014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 172018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 262016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate19.66750%9.833
Best 5No. 162014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 172018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 262016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 332021–22No. 422019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate26.80030%8.040
Best 10No. 162014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 172018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 262016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 332021–22No. 422019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 422020–21No. 432017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 692015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 812025–26No. 1182023–2448.70020%9.740

9.833 + 8.040 + 9.740= 27.613

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Josh Smith and Rudy Gobert
MetricJosh SmithRudy Gobert
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#178Better result for this metric.#209
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better13.3Better result for this metric.19.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better19.4Better result for this metric.26.8
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better51.048.7Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Josh Smith and Rudy Gobert
MetricJosh SmithRudy Gobert
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#142#139Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.0+5.0
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.3+4.3
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.9Better result for this metric.+3.8
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.5+2.7Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,309 pts+2,352 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons1Better result for this metric.0

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Josh Smith and Rudy Gobert
MetricJosh SmithRudy Gobert
Games894905
Minutes29,00027,811

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Josh Smith and Rudy Gobert
MetricJosh SmithRudy Gobert
True shooting percentage50.4%67.2%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile51.1%67.0%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Josh Smith and Rudy Gobert
MetricJosh SmithRudy Gobert
Field-goal percentage45.2%65.8%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage28.5%Better result for this metric.0.0%
Free-throw percentage63.2%63.3%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Josh Smith and Rudy Gobert
MetricJosh SmithRudy Gobert
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.5%Better result for this metric.6.8%
Assists per game3.1Better result for this metric.1.4
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Josh Smith and Rudy Gobert
MetricJosh SmithRudy Gobert
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.7%Better result for this metric.14.8%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Josh Smith and Rudy Gobert
MetricJosh SmithRudy Gobert
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.7%21.3%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game7.411.7Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Josh Smith and Rudy Gobert
MetricJosh SmithRudy Gobert
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.9%Better result for this metric.1.1%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Josh Smith and Rudy Gobert
MetricJosh SmithRudy Gobert
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile4.7%5.8%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Josh Smith and Rudy Gobert
MetricJosh SmithRudy Gobert
Points per game14.5Better result for this metric.12.5

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Josh Smith ranks higher in career impact so far.

Josh SmithMetricRudy Gobert
#178LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#209
+5.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.0
+3.9LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.8
+2,309 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,352 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Rudy Gobert leads every available measure below.

Josh SmithMetricRudy Gobert
593Listed-team regular-season wins593
48.8%Listed-team winning percentage56.7%Leads
350-win team seasons4Leads
060-win team seasons0
10Playoff team seasons10

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Rudy Gobert leads every available measure below.

Josh SmithMetricRudy Gobert
8Playoff appearances10Leads
73Playoff games96Leads
31Team playoff wins46Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Rudy Gobert leads every available measure below.

Josh SmithMetricRudy Gobert
0All-Star3Leads
0MVP0
0All-NBA4Leads
1All-Defense9Leads
0DPOY4Leads
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Josh SmithRudy GobertPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.