hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

Player profile · MIN / UTA

Illustrated portrait of NBA player Rudy Gobert

Rudy Gobert

Rudy Gobert stats, teams and career impact

#209 all-timeCareer averages · 12.5 PPG · 11.7 RPG · 1.4 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Position
Center
2025–26 team
Minnesota Timberwolves
Height / weight
7 ft 1 in (216 cm) · 258 lb (117 kg)
Born
June 26, 1992 (34 yrs old)
NBA seasons
13 seasons · 2013–14 to 2025–26

Selected season2025–26 · MIN · 76 games · 2,380 minutes

PPG
10.9
RPG
11.5
APG
1.7
Impact Rate Rank
#81 of 395
76 games · 2,380 minutes
Season Value percentile
87th percentile

Career overview

Why Rudy Gobert currently ranks #209 all time

Rudy Gobert ranks #209 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #19.7. His full-career value already ranks #139 after 13 seasons, and his all-time position can still rise.

Peak#16 in 2014–15

Best league finish

Sustained excellence12 ranked seasons

450+ minutes required per season

Career breadth13 seasons so far

905 games · Career Value Rank #139

NBA honors3× All-Star · 4× All-NBA · 9× All-Defense · 4× DPOYContext only; honors are not model inputs.

Head to head

Compare Rudy Gobert with…

Choose any two players →

Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Two active players open in the latest published season; switch to Career to compare their full careers.

  1. Rudy Gobert vs. Jack Sikma Similar career path
  2. Rudy Gobert vs. Draymond Green Similar career path
  3. Rudy Gobert vs. Kevin McHale Similar career path
  4. Rudy Gobert vs. Artis Gilmore Similar career path
  5. Rudy Gobert vs. Bob McAdoo Similar career path
  6. Rudy Gobert vs. Carlos Boozer Similar career path
  7. Rudy Gobert vs. Bradley Beal Same-era comparison
  8. Rudy Gobert vs. CJ McCollum Same-era comparison
  9. Rudy Gobert vs. Andre Drummond Same-era comparison
  10. Rudy Gobert vs. Kristaps Porziņģis Same-era comparison
Suggested comparisons, not a ranking of search traffic.
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources

Full team history

Teams
Utah Jazz and Minnesota Timberwolves

Career shooting

NBA regular season
Field goal
65.8%FG%
Three-point
0.0%3P%
Free throw
63.3%FT%

905 career games · 27,811 minutes

Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.

Traditional box score

Rudy Gobert stats by season

Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.

Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.

Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →

pts/100 · higher is better
2025–2610.911.51.7+0.27MIN767631.368.2%0.0%52.6%#8156.9
2024–2512.010.91.8+0.67MIN727233.266.9%—67.4%#129129.5
2023–2414.012.91.3+0.53MIN767634.166.1%0.0%63.8%#118132.9
2022–2313.411.61.2+0.25MIN707030.765.9%0.0%64.4%#140101.7
2021–2215.614.71.1+3.10UTA666632.171.3%0.0%69.0%#33218.8
2020–2114.313.51.3+2.76UTA717130.867.5%0.0%62.3%#42213.7
2019–2015.113.51.5+2.49UTA686834.369.3%—63.0%#42215.4
2018–1915.912.92.0+4.99UTA818031.866.9%—63.6%#17376.2
2017–1813.510.71.4+2.65UTA565632.462.2%—68.2%#43168.5
2016–1714.012.81.2+3.62UTA818133.966.1%0.0%65.3%#26294.2
2015–169.111.01.5+1.56UTA616031.755.9%—56.9%#69130.2
2014–158.49.51.3+4.36UTA823726.360.4%0.0%62.3%#16258.6
2013–142.33.40.2-2.15UTA4509.648.6%—49.2%—-1.2
Career12.511.71.4—MIN/UTA905—30.765.8%0.0%63.3%——

Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.

Film evidence

Rudy Gobert highlights

Watch the selected footage or film analysis, then use the season record and impact data to put what happened on the floor in context.

Defensive retrospective

Rudy Gobert's best Defensive Player of the Year moments

The focused defensive reel shows Gobert's rim deterrence, positioning and recovery range across each of his Defensive Player of the Year seasons.

RoleC · Age 33
Availability76 games · 76 starts
Workload31.3 MPG · 2,380 minutes
Relative impactMIN #2 of 10 · C #20 of 72
UpdatedOct 6, 2026
What these measures mean
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
Impact Rate
A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
Impact estimate
The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
Impact Rate rank
The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
Value contribution / Season Value
Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
Career Impact Rank
An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
Impact Rate Rank#81 of 395

76 games · 2,380 minutes · 71.6 / 100 · higher score is better · No. 1 is the best rank

Data coverageBroad

Ranking certainty: Wide, likely #21–#308

Impact Rate
0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.
Impact estimate
The live model's final estimate in points per 100 possessions, including lineup evidence. It can differ from box impact. Higher is better.

Bottom line · 2025–26

Rudy Gobert delivered a strong 2025–26 campaign, ranking 81st in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 147th. After adjusting for teammates and opponents, his on-court defense was stronger than the box score indicated, lifting his overall rating. Playing about 2,400 minutes, he finished in the 87th percentile for total season value.

2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Rudy Gobert's impact

395 qualified NBA playersEvery player in the comparison logged at least 450 minutes.
Compare with

Overall value

Impact Rate
0–100 score · higher is better
71.6 / 100
Season Value
87
56.9

Scoring role

Usage
10
12.9%
True shooting
94
66.4%
3-point attempt rate
4
1.0%
Free-throw rate
99
61.5%

Creation and control

Assist rate
11
7.2%
Turnover avoidance
22
14.5%

Possession stats

Rebound rate
95
20.1%
Steal rate
22
1.2%
Block rate
93
4.5%

Lineup signal

Offensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
10
−1.79 pts/100
Defensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
100
+4.33 pts/100

Workload

Minutes per game
86
31.3
Games played
86
76
Total minutes
93
2,380

A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession. The other bars show percentiles in the selected comparison group. Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup figures are points per 100 possessions; higher is better. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.

Ranking editions

How the ranking changed

Both editions use the source snapshot dated Jul 14, 2026. These are model-version changes, not results from new games. Each edition keeps its original published numbers.

Full season · original model (v1.0)#82

71.2 Impact Rate · 2,380 MP

Ranking edition: Jul 21, 2026

First snapshot
Full season · hussEyquation v1.1#81

71.6 Impact Rate · 2,380 MP

Ranking edition: Oct 6, 2026

↑1 since prior

Every season

Rudy Gobert advanced stats by season

Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.

More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
pts/100 · higher is better0–100 · higher is better
2025–26live modelMIN33762,380+0.2771.6#8156.987thBroad
2024–25MIN32722,389+0.6767.0#129129.581stBroad
2023–24MIN31762,593+0.5368.4#118132.982ndBroad
2022–23MIN30702,148+0.2563.2#140101.774thBroad
2021–22UTA29662,120+3.1091.7#33218.893rdBroad
2020–21UTA28712,187+2.7688.9#42213.793rdBroad
2019–20Historical Defense EstimateUTA27682,333+2.4988.4#42215.494thBroad
2018–19Historical Defense EstimateUTA26812,577+4.9995.7#17376.296thBroad
2017–18Historical Defense EstimateUTA25561,816+2.6588.4#43168.588thBroad
2016–17Historical Defense EstimateUTA24812,744+3.6293.1#26294.294thBroad
2015–16Historical Defense EstimateUTA23611,932+1.5681.3#69130.281stBroad
2014–15Historical Defense EstimateUTA22822,158+4.3695.9#16258.695thBroad
2013–14Historical Defense EstimateUTA2145434-2.15——-1.2—Limited

Career movement

Rudy Gobert's box impact by season

Peak box impact +4.99 points per 100 possessions in 2018–19 · 13 seasons · 27,811 minutes

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.

Box impact · points per 100 possessionsMinutes
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload

Career comparison

Compare the shape, not the calendar

Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.

Open full comparison →
Rudy GobertJack Sikma
Box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better · dashed marker means the player did not play
Rudy Gobert and Jack Sikma era-centered impact values by NBA season number
NBA seasonRudy GobertJack Sikma
1-2.2-0.4
24.41.7
31.62.1
43.62.0
52.74.5
65.02.8
72.53.6
82.85.2
93.12.5
100.31.1
110.52.5
120.72.3
130.31.0
14Did not play-0.7

NBA season number

Similar career arcs

Players with careers similar to Rudy Gobert

The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.

Why this rank?

Why Rudy Gobert ranks #81

The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.

Steps 1–4 use points per 100 possessions. Step 5 converts the final estimate to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Higher is better on both scales; they are not the same number.

01 · Box-score prior+0.74

Prior rank #147

02 · Multi-season RAPM+2.27

Current total +1.69 ±0.9
Split model · O -1.79 · D +4.33 = +2.54

03 · Bounded correction+0.43

Maximum ±1.25

04 · Impact estimate+1.17

Points per 100 possessions · higher is better

05 · Impact Rate · 0–10071.6

Higher is better · 71.6 before the MPG adjustment · rank #81

RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.

Ranking certaintyWide

The model's 80% impact interval is -1.06 to +3.42. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.

Top 25 chance
12%
Top 50 chance
22%
Top 100 chance
40%
80% rank range
#21–#308
How to read this page

Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →