Julian Champagnie
2022–23 to 2025–26 · 4 seasons · active
NBA player comparison
Julian Champagnie vs. Kelenna Azubuike: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Kelenna Azubuike ranks higher in career impact so far
Kelenna Azubuike
2006–07 to 2011–12 · 5 seasons
Impact comparison
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.
#1966Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1912Leads
+0.0LeadsPeak box impact so farEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.2
-0.2LeadsAverage box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5
#90LeadsBest league finish#141
+222 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+140 pts
255LeadsGames208
Career Impact Rank places Kelenna Azubuike #1912 and Julian Champagnie #1966. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Julian Champagnie had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJulian Champagnie213.633 · No. 1,966Kelenna Azubuike206.733 · No. 1,912
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Julian Champagnie
213.633 composite · No. 1,966 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 902025–26No. 1752023–24No. 1902024–25 | 151.667 | 50% | 75.833 |
| Best 5No. 902025–26No. 1752023–24No. 1902024–252 open slots × No. 390 | 247.000 | 30% | 74.100 |
| Best 10No. 902025–26No. 1752023–24No. 1902024–257 open slots × No. 390 | 318.500 | 20% | 63.700 |
75.833 + 74.100 + 63.700= 213.633
Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 390, this player's stored replacement finish.
Kelenna Azubuike
206.733 composite · No. 1,912 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 1412006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1622008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1822007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 161.667 | 50% | 80.833 |
| Best 5No. 1412006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1622008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1822007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 335 | 231.000 | 30% | 69.300 |
| Best 10No. 1412006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1622008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1822007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate7 open slots × No. 335 | 283.000 | 20% | 56.600 |
80.833 + 69.300 + 56.600= 206.733
Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 335, this player's stored replacement finish.
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Julian Champagnie | Kelenna Azubuike |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank | #1966 | #1912Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 151.7Better result for this metric. | 161.7 |
| Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 247.0 | 231.0Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 318.5 | 283.0Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Julian Champagnie | Kelenna Azubuike |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #1151Better result for this metric. | #1318 |
| Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +0.0Better result for this metric. | -0.2 |
| Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | -0.2Better result for this metric. | -0.5 |
| Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +222 ptsBetter result for this metric. | +140 pts |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Julian Champagnie | Kelenna Azubuike |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 255 | 208 |
| Minutes | 5,986 | 5,025 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Julian Champagnie | Kelenna Azubuike |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 58.9%Better result for this metric. | 55.7% |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 58.5%Better result for this metric. | 55.6% |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Julian Champagnie | Kelenna Azubuike |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 42.4% | 45.9%Better result for this metric. |
| Three-point percentage | 37.5% | 40.9%Better result for this metric. |
| Free-throw percentage | 85.2%Better result for this metric. | 77.0% |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Julian Champagnie | Kelenna Azubuike |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 8.2%Better result for this metric. | 6.6% |
| Assists per game | 1.4Better result for this metric. | 1.1 |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Julian Champagnie | Kelenna Azubuike |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 9.8%Better result for this metric. | 10.2% |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Julian Champagnie | Kelenna Azubuike |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 9.2%Better result for this metric. | 8.7% |
| Rebounds per game | 4.1Better result for this metric. | 4.0 |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Julian Champagnie | Kelenna Azubuike |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 1.5%Better result for this metric. | 1.4% |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Julian Champagnie | Kelenna Azubuike |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 1.8%Better result for this metric. | 1.3% |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Julian Champagnie | Kelenna Azubuike |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 9.4 | 10.5Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.
Regular Season Impact
Kelenna Azubuike ranks higher in career impact so far.
Julian ChampagnieMetricKelenna Azubuike
#1966Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1912Leads
+0.0LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.2
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
+222 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+140 pts
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
Julian Champagnie leads every available measure below.
Julian ChampagnieMetricKelenna Azubuike
194LeadsListed-team regular-season wins181
47.3%LeadsListed-team winning percentage45.9%
2Leads50-win team seasons0
1Leads60-win team seasons0
2Playoff team seasons2
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Julian ChampagnieMetricKelenna Azubuike
1Playoff appearances2Leads
23LeadsPlayoff games7
13LeadsTeam playoff wins5
1LeadsFinals appearances0
0Championships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
No recorded measure separates these careers.
Julian ChampagnieMetricKelenna Azubuike
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Julian ChampagnieKelenna AzubuikePeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Julian ChampagnieNBA seasonKelenna Azubuike
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.