69.3 score · 97% MPG role factor
Explore rankings
Player profile · PHI / SAS

Julian Champagnie
Julian Champagnie advanced stats and career rankings
53.2 total value · 395 qualified players
105.2 all-time composite · 4 seasons
Low ranking precision · Likely rank #27–#309
Bottom line · 2025–26
Julian Champagnie delivered a strong 2025–26 campaign, ranking 90th in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 161st, led by strong ball security. After adjusting for teammates and opponents, his on-court offense was stronger than the box score indicated, lifting his overall rating. Playing about 2,300 minutes, he finished in the 86th percentile for total season value.
2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Julian Champagnie's impact
Overall value
Scoring role
Creation and control
Possession stats
Lineup signal
Workload
Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.
Every season
Julian Champagnie advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
Career movement
Julian Champagnie's career impact by season
Peak +0.04 in 2025–26 · 4 seasons · 5,986 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Early-career comparison
Compare the first 4 seasons
Only the first 4 NBA seasons are compared, so this is a similarity of starts—not a prediction of the full career.
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar starts
Players with starts similar to Julian Champagnie
The score compares the first 4 seasons by impact, workload, position, and trajectory. It does not claim the careers will finish alike.
Bob Harris
97%start match
95% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 1952–53SF · All-Time Career #338Dave Budd
93%start match
91% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 1962–63PF · All-Time Career #1464Dave Meyers
93%start match
93% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 1977–78SG · All-Time Career #326Med Park
93%start match
90% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 1959–60SF · All-Time Career #1987Kelenna Azubuike
93%start match
97% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 2008–09SG · All-Time Career #2062Cason Wallace
93%start match
91% season match · 2025–26 ↔ 2025–26Why this rank?
Why Julian Champagnie ranks #90
The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.
Prior rank #161
Current total +4.85 ±1.0
Split model · O +3.28 · D +1.46 = +4.74
Maximum ±0.75
Before the within-season scale
70.5 unadjusted · 97% role factor · rank #90
RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.
The model's 80% impact interval is -1.09 to +3.38. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.
- Top 25 chance
- 9%
- Top 50 chance
- 20%
- Top 100 chance
- 38%
- 80% rank range
- #27–#309
Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →