hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

Player profile · PHI / SAS

Illustrated portrait of NBA player Julian Champagnie

Julian Champagnie

Julian Champagnie stats, teams and career impact

#1966 all-timeCareer averages · 9.4 PPG · 4.1 RPG · 1.4 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Position
Small forward
2025–26 team
San Antonio Spurs
Height / weight
6 ft 7 in (201 cm) · 217 lb (98 kg)
Born
June 29, 2001 (25 yrs old)
College
St. John's
NBA seasons
4 seasons · 2022–23 to 2025–26

Selected season2025–26 · SAS · 82 games · 2,266 minutes

PPG
11.1
RPG
5.8
APG
1.5
Impact Rate Rank
#90 of 395
82 games · 2,266 minutes
Season Value percentile
86th percentile

Career overview

Why Julian Champagnie currently ranks #1966 all time

Julian Champagnie ranks #1966 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #151.7. His full-career value already ranks #1151 after 4 seasons, and his all-time position can still rise.

Peak#90 in 2025–26

Best league finish

Sustained excellence3 ranked seasons

450+ minutes required per season

Career breadth4 seasons so far

255 games · Career Value Rank #1151

Head to head

Compare Julian Champagnie with…

Choose any two players →

Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Two active players open in the latest published season; switch to Career to compare their full careers.

  1. Julian Champagnie vs. T.J. Warren Similar career path
  2. Julian Champagnie vs. Jack Marin Similar career path
  3. Julian Champagnie vs. Bill Bridges Similar career path
  4. Julian Champagnie vs. Truck Robinson Similar career path
  5. Julian Champagnie vs. Tobias Harris Similar career path
  6. Julian Champagnie vs. Dick Barnett Similar career path
  7. Julian Champagnie vs. Keon Ellis Same-era comparison
  8. Julian Champagnie vs. Christian Braun Same-era comparison
  9. Julian Champagnie vs. Scotty Pippen Jr. Same-era comparison
  10. Julian Champagnie vs. Tari Eason Same-era comparison
Suggested comparisons, not a ranking of search traffic.
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources

Full team history

Teams
Philadelphia 76ers and San Antonio Spurs

Career shooting

NBA regular season
Field goal
42.4%FG%
Three-point
37.5%3P%
Free throw
85.2%FT%

255 career games · 5,986 minutes

Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.

Traditional box score

Julian Champagnie stats by season

Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.

Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.

Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →

pts/100 · higher is better
2025–2611.15.81.5+0.04SAS826827.643.7%38.1%84.4%#9053.1
2024–259.93.91.4-0.39SAS822923.641.5%37.1%90.4%#19064.5
2023–246.82.81.4-0.25SAS745919.840.8%36.5%81.5%#17554.1
2022–239.73.50.6-1.03PHI/SAS17318.845.4%40.2%82.4%—6.6
Career9.44.11.4—PHI/SAS255—23.542.4%37.5%85.2%——

Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.

RoleSF · Age 24
Availability82 games · 68 starts
Workload27.6 MPG · 2,266 minutes
Relative impactSAS #3 of 10 · SF #15 of 68
UpdatedOct 6, 2026
What these measures mean
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
Impact Rate
A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
Impact estimate
The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
Impact Rate rank
The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
Value contribution / Season Value
Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
Career Impact Rank
An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
Impact Rate Rank#90 of 395

82 games · 2,266 minutes · 69.7 / 100 · higher score is better · No. 1 is the best rank

Data coverageBroad

Ranking certainty: Wide, likely #27–#308

Impact Rate
0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.
Impact estimate
The live model's final estimate in points per 100 possessions, including lineup evidence. It can differ from box impact. Higher is better.

Bottom line · 2025–26

Julian Champagnie delivered a strong 2025–26 campaign, ranking 90th in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 161st, led by strong ball security. After adjusting for teammates and opponents, his on-court offense was stronger than the box score indicated, lifting his overall rating. Playing about 2,300 minutes, he finished in the 86th percentile for total season value.

2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Julian Champagnie's impact

395 qualified NBA playersEvery player in the comparison logged at least 450 minutes.
Compare with

Overall value

Impact Rate
0–100 score · higher is better
69.7 / 100
Season Value
86
53.1

Scoring role

Usage
25
15.2%
True shooting
74
60.9%
3-point attempt rate
96
74.3%
Free-throw rate
33
19.6%

Creation and control

Assist rate
12
7.3%
Turnover avoidance
90
8.4%

Possession stats

Rebound rate
69
11.2%
Steal rate
29
1.3%
Block rate
54
1.5%

Lineup signal

Offensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
97
+3.28 pts/100
Defensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
85
+1.46 pts/100

Workload

Minutes per game
69
27.6
Games played
98
82
Total minutes
90
2,266

A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession. The other bars show percentiles in the selected comparison group. Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup figures are points per 100 possessions; higher is better. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.

Ranking editions

How the ranking changed

Both editions use the source snapshot dated Jul 14, 2026. These are model-version changes, not results from new games. Each edition keeps its original published numbers.

Full season · original model (v1.0)#90

69.3 Impact Rate · 2,266 MP

Ranking edition: Jul 21, 2026

First snapshot
Full season · hussEyquation v1.1#90

69.7 Impact Rate · 2,266 MP

Ranking edition: Oct 6, 2026

No rank change

Every season

Julian Champagnie advanced stats by season

Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.

More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
pts/100 · higher is better0–100 · higher is better
2025–26live modelSAS24822,266+0.0469.7#9053.186thBroad
2024–25SAS23821,932-0.3951.3#19064.564thBroad
2023–24SAS22741,468-0.2553.0#17554.156thBroad
2022–23PHI/SAS2117320-1.03——6.6—Limited

Career movement

Julian Champagnie's box impact by season

Peak box impact +0.04 points per 100 possessions in 2025–26 · 4 seasons · 5,986 minutes

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.

Box impact · points per 100 possessionsMinutes
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload

Early-career comparison

Compare the first 4 seasons

Both players are limited to their first 4 seasons. Later seasons never affect the selection or score, and the result is not a career prediction.

Open full comparison →
Julian ChampagnieT.J. Warren
Box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better · dashed marker means the player did not play
Julian Champagnie and T.J. Warren era-centered impact values by NBA season number
NBA seasonJulian ChampagnieT.J. Warren
1-1.0-1.7
2-0.3-0.1
3-0.4-1.0
40.0-0.4

NBA season number · first 4 seasons only

Similar starts

Players with starts similar to Julian Champagnie

The start-similarity percentile compares era-relative impact, season-relative workload, trajectory, debut age, and role across exactly 4 seasons and 1,880 eligible starts. Higher means closer; it is not a probability or forecast.

Why this rank?

Why Julian Champagnie ranks #90

The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.

Steps 1–4 use points per 100 possessions. Step 5 converts the final estimate to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Higher is better on both scales; they are not the same number.

01 · Box-score prior+0.66

Prior rank #161

02 · Multi-season RAPM+2.44

Current total +4.85 ±1.0
Split model · O +3.28 · D +1.46 = +4.74

03 · Bounded correction+0.50

Maximum ±1.25

04 · Impact estimate+1.16

Points per 100 possessions · higher is better

05 · Impact Rate · 0–10069.7

Higher is better · 70.9 before the MPG adjustment · rank #90

RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.

Ranking certaintyWide

The model's 80% impact interval is -1.09 to +3.38. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.

Top 25 chance
9%
Top 50 chance
20%
Top 100 chance
39%
80% rank range
#27–#308
How to read this page

Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →