Julius Randle
2025–26
79 games · 2,610 minutes
NBA player comparison
Julius Randle vs. Zach LaVine: 2025–26 season
Regular-season verdict
Julius Randle leads in impact for 2025–26
Julius Randle ranks ahead of Zach LaVine in estimated impact while playing. This compares regular-season performance, not total contribution across the season.
Zach LaVine
2025–26
39 games · 1,224 minutes
Impact comparison
Impact estimate is measured in points per 100 possessions above league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Impact Rate rank is a league place, not a 0–100 score: No. 1 is best.
+1.0LeadsImpact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2
#112LeadsImpact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#236
-1.14Estimated defensive impactSelected-season lineup estimate · points per 100 possessions-0.95Leads
+2.72LeadsEstimated offensive impactSelected-season lineup estimate · points per 100 possessions-0.55
1.6%LeadsSteal rate1.1%
13.2%Turnover rateLower is better; compare alongside offensive workload10.8%Leads
26.5%Offensive usage23.7%
58.5%True shooting %61.4%Leads
23.1%LeadsAssist rateShare of teammates’ made shots assisted while on court11.2%
11.2%LeadsRebound rateShare of available rebounds collected while on court4.9%
79Games39
2,610Minutes1,224
Julius Randle's estimated impact per 100 possessions was +1.0, compared with +0.2 for Zach LaVine. This compares their impact while playing, not their total contribution across the season. Both players are compared in the 2025–26 season using its published Impact Rate. A ranked comparison requires at least 450 minutes for each player.
Julius Randle: 79 games and 2,610 minutes. Zach LaVine: 39 games and 1,224 minutes. Playing time matters when judging the whole season; the impact estimate above is a rate, not a season total.
Julius Randle ended a larger share of his team’s possessions, so the turnover rates are not an equal-workload comparison. Offensive usage measures the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on the court—not every touch, pass, or act of playmaking. These rows provide context; they are not extra points added to the ranking.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Behind the estimate
Why the model rates them this way
The model starts with each player’s recorded individual stats, then adjusts that estimate using lineup results. The first two rows add up to the final estimate. All figures are points per 100 possessions.
Julius RandleMetricZach LaVine
+0.89LeadsFrom recorded individual stats+0.52
+0.11LeadsAdjustment from recent lineup results-0.33
+1.00LeadsFinal estimated impact+0.19
Lineup evidence: Julius Randle — 3 seasons; Zach LaVine — 3 seasons. This adjustment is not necessarily based on the selected season alone.
Offensive and defensive lineup estimates for the selected season
These selected-season estimates account for who played alongside and against each player. Positive means better than average; a positive defensive figure means fewer points allowed. They are separate estimates—not additional points added to the calculation above. They do not measure how much individual teammates improved.
Julius RandleMetricZach LaVine
+2.72LeadsAdjusted offensive impact-0.55
-1.14Adjusted defensive impact-0.95Leads
What this does not establish: these figures do not prove that either player made his teammates shoot better. A verified teammate-shooting comparison is unavailable for this selected season. A small difference in the estimates is not a decisive basketball distinction.
Full comparison · 2025–26 season
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
The impact estimate compares performance while playing, not total contribution over the season. The individual-stat estimate plus the lineup adjustment gives the final estimate.
| Metric | Julius Randle | Zach LaVine |
|---|---|---|
| Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +1.0Better result for this metric. | +0.2 |
| Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best | #112Better result for this metric. | #236 |
| From recorded individual stats | +0.89Better result for this metric. | +0.52 |
| Adjustment from recent lineup results | +0.11Better result for this metric. | -0.33 |
Julius Randle: 3 seasons of lineup evidence. Zach LaVine: 3 seasons of lineup evidence. The adjustment is not necessarily based on this season alone.
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Julius Randle | Zach LaVine |
|---|---|---|
| Final estimated impact | +1.00Better result for this metric. | +0.19 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Julius Randle | Zach LaVine |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 79 | 39 |
| Minutes | 2,610 | 1,224 |
| Offensive usage | 26.5% | 23.7% |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These figures describe the selected regular seasons. They provide context, not extra points added to the verdict. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Julius Randle | Zach LaVine |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 58.5% | 61.4%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Julius Randle | Zach LaVine |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 48.1%Better result for this metric. | 47.9% |
| Three-point percentage | 31.5% | 39.0%Better result for this metric. |
| Free-throw percentage | 80.2% | 88.0%Better result for this metric. |
| Three-point attempt rateShare of field-goal attempts taken from three; describes shot selection, not quality | 28.7% | 46.4% |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Julius Randle | Zach LaVine |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateShare of teammates’ made shots assisted while on court | 23.1%Better result for this metric. | 11.2% |
| Assists per game | 5.0Better result for this metric. | 2.3 |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Julius Randle | Zach LaVine |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateLower is better; compare alongside offensive workload | 13.2% | 10.8%Better result for this metric. |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Julius Randle | Zach LaVine |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateShare of available rebounds collected while on court | 11.2%Better result for this metric. | 4.9% |
| Rebounds per game | 6.7Better result for this metric. | 2.8 |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Julius Randle | Zach LaVine |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rate | 1.6%Better result for this metric. | 1.1% |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Julius Randle | Zach LaVine |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateShare of opponents’ two-point attempts blocked while on court | 0.6% | 0.8%Better result for this metric. |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Julius Randle | Zach LaVine |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 21.1Better result for this metric. | 19.2 |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Selected-season adjusted lineup estimates
These account for who played alongside and against each player. Positive defense means fewer points allowed. They are separate from the observed results and are not additional points added to the model calculation.
| Metric | Julius Randle | Zach LaVine |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted offensive impact | +2.72Better result for this metric. | -0.55 |
| Adjusted defensive impact | -1.14 | -0.95Better result for this metric. |
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.
Regular Season Impact
Julius Randle leads in impact for 2025–26.
Julius RandleMetricZach LaVine
+1.0LeadsImpact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2
#112LeadsImpact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#236
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
Julius Randle leads every available measure below.
Julius RandleMetricZach LaVine
426LeadsListed-team regular-season wins404
44.5%LeadsListed-team winning percentage38.9%
1Leads50-win team seasons0
060-win team seasons0
5LeadsPlayoff team seasons1
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Julius Randle leads every available measure below.
Julius RandleMetricZach LaVine
4LeadsPlayoff appearances1
42LeadsPlayoff games4
22LeadsTeam playoff wins1
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
Julius Randle leads every available measure below.
Julius RandleMetricZach LaVine
3LeadsAll-Star2
0MVP0
2LeadsAll-NBA0
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.
Selected seasons
Box impact
Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.
Julius RandleZach LaVine
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.