62.6 score · 100% MPG role factor
Explore rankings
Player profile · LAL / MIN / NOP / NYK
Julius Randle
Julius Randle advanced stats and career rankings
RolePF · Age 31
Availability79 games · 79 starts
Workload33.0 MPG · 2,610 minutes
Relative impactMIN #5 of 10 · PF #18 of 76
UpdatedJul 21, 2026
53.2 total value · 395 qualified players
72.5 all-time composite · 12 seasons
Low ranking precision · Likely rank #25–#318
Bottom line · 2025–26
Julius Randle delivered a strong 2025–26 campaign, ranking 110th in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 130th, led by elite passing despite costly turnovers. Playing about 2,600 minutes, he finished in the 86th percentile for total season value.
2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Julius Randle's impact
395 qualified NBA playersEvery player in the comparison logged at least 450 minutes.
Compare with
Overall value
Impact Rate
72
62.6Season Value
86
53.2Scoring role
Usage
89
26.5%True shooting
57
58.5%3-point attempt rate
21
28.7%Free-throw rate
90
41.1%Creation and control
Assist rate
83
23.1%Turnover avoidance
37
13.2%Possession stats
Rebound rate
69
11.2%Steal rate
49
1.6%Block rate
13
0.6%Lineup signal
Offensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
94
+2.72Defensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
20
−1.14Workload
Minutes per game
91
33.0Games played
94
79Total minutes
97
2,610Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.
Every season
Julius Randle advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26live model | MIN | 31 | 79 | 2,610 | +0.68 | 62.6 | #110 | 53.2 | 86th | Strong |
| 2024–25 | MIN | 30 | 69 | 2,226 | +0.29 | 61.9 | #149 | 103.5 | 77th | Strong |
| 2023–24 | NYK | 29 | 46 | 1,630 | +1.01 | 75.7 | #91 | 97.4 | 72nd | Strong |
| 2022–23 | NYK | 28 | 77 | 2,737 | +2.71 | 89.9 | #39 | 260.9 | 94th | Strong |
| 2021–22 | NYK | 27 | 72 | 2,544 | +0.19 | 60.4 | #153 | 111.6 | 78th | Strong |
| 2020–21 | NYK | 26 | 71 | 2,667 | +3.17 | 91.3 | #33 | 275.3 | 96th | Strong |
| 2019–20Historical Defense Estimate | NYK | 25 | 64 | 2,080 | +0.56 | 63.4 | #130 | 109.4 | 75th | Strong |
| 2018–19Historical Defense Estimate | NOP | 24 | 73 | 2,232 | +1.66 | 81.5 | #69 | 175.7 | 88th | Strong |
| 2017–18Historical Defense Estimate | LAL | 23 | 82 | 2,190 | +0.68 | 70.6 | #107 | 122.8 | 78th | Strong |
| 2016–17Historical Defense Estimate | LAL | 22 | 74 | 2,132 | -0.26 | 60.1 | #146 | 76.2 | 69th | Strong |
| 2015–16Historical Defense Estimate | LAL | 21 | 81 | 2,286 | -2.01 | 26.7 | #267 | -0.4 | 27th | Strong |
| 2014–15Historical Defense Estimate | LAL | 20 | 1 | 14 | -12.72 | — | — | -2.9 | — | Limited |
Career movement
Julius Randle's career impact by season
Peak +3.17 in 2020–21 · 12 seasons · 25,348 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Julius RandleClint Capela
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Julius Randle
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
C · All-Time Career #1138
Clint Capela
91%career match
88% season match · 2020–21 ↔ 2018–19PF · All-Time Career #458Mickey Johnson
90%career match
95% season match · 2020–21 ↔ 1979–80PF · All-Time Career #146Bob Boozer
90%career match
90% season match · 2020–21 ↔ 1966–67PF · All-Time Career #904David Lee
90%career match
91% season match · 2020–21 ↔ 2009–10SF · All-Time Career #1202Robert Covington
90%career match
87% season match · 2020–21 ↔ 2017–18PF · All-Time Career #1048Anthony Mason
89%career match
88% season match · 2020–21 ↔ 1994–95Why this rank?
Why Julius Randle ranks #110
The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.
Prior rank #130
Current total +2.07 ±0.9
Split model · O +2.72 · D -1.14 = +1.58
Maximum ±0.75
Before the within-season scale
62.6 unadjusted · 100% role factor · rank #110
RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.
What the point estimate meansLow precision
The model's 80% impact interval is -1.24 to +3.25. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.
- Top 25 chance
- 10%
- Top 50 chance
- 19%
- Top 100 chance
- 36%
- 80% rank range
- #25–#318
Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →