Kurt Thomas
1995–96 to 2012–13 · 18 seasons
NBA player comparison
Kurt Thomas vs. Taj Gibson: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Taj Gibson ranks higher in career impact so far
Taj Gibson
2009–10 to 2025–26 · 17 seasons · active
Impact comparison
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.
#1236Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1212Leads
+0.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8Leads
+0.0Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5Leads
105.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better108.7
+471 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+669 ptsLeads
153.4Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better144.4Leads
Career Impact Rank places Taj Gibson #1212 and Kurt Thomas #1236. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedKurt Thomas120.653 · No. 1,236Taj Gibson118.253 · No. 1,212
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Kurt Thomas
120.653 composite · No. 1,236 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 1002007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1082000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1092008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 105.667 | 50% | 52.833 |
| Best 5No. 1002007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1082000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1092008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1402002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1622004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 123.800 | 30% | 37.140 |
| Best 10No. 1002007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1082000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1092008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1402002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1622004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1672010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1742003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1811998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1912001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2021999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 153.400 | 20% | 30.680 |
52.833 + 37.140 + 30.680= 120.653
Taj Gibson
118.253 composite · No. 1,212 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 1042015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1112011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1112020–21 | 108.667 | 50% | 54.333 |
| Best 5No. 1042015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1112011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1112020–21No. 1252018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1332013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 116.800 | 30% | 35.040 |
| Best 10No. 1042015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1112011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1112020–21No. 1252018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1332013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1472014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1632012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1772019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1802010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1932016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 144.400 | 20% | 28.880 |
54.333 + 35.040 + 28.880= 118.253
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Kurt Thomas | Taj Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank | #1236 | #1212Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 105.7Better result for this metric. | 108.7 |
| Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 123.8 | 116.8Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 153.4 | 144.4Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Kurt Thomas | Taj Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #811 | #650Better result for this metric. |
| Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +0.5 | +0.8Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +0.3 | +0.8Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +0.0 | +0.5Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | -0.5 | +0.0Better result for this metric. |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +471 pts | +669 ptsBetter result for this metric. |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Kurt Thomas | Taj Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1,110 | 1,012 |
| Minutes | 27,160 | 23,166 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Kurt Thomas | Taj Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 51.9% | 55.4%Better result for this metric. |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 52.1% | 55.9%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Kurt Thomas | Taj Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 48.6% | 51.7%Better result for this metric. |
| Three-point percentage | 28.1%Better result for this metric. | 27.2% |
| Free-throw percentage | 76.0%Better result for this metric. | 71.3% |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Kurt Thomas | Taj Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 7.9%Better result for this metric. | 6.7% |
| Assists per game | 1.1Better result for this metric. | 0.9 |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Kurt Thomas | Taj Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 12.7% | 11.9%Better result for this metric. |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Kurt Thomas | Taj Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 15.6%Better result for this metric. | 13.9% |
| Rebounds per game | 6.6Better result for this metric. | 5.7 |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Kurt Thomas | Taj Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 1.5%Better result for this metric. | 1.2% |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Kurt Thomas | Taj Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 2.3% | 3.6%Better result for this metric. |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Kurt Thomas | Taj Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 8.1 | 8.3Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.
Regular Season Impact
Taj Gibson ranks higher in career impact so far.
Kurt ThomasMetricTaj Gibson
#1236Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1212Leads
+0.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8Leads
+0.0Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5Leads
+471 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+669 ptsLeads
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
Kurt Thomas leads every available measure below.
Kurt ThomasMetricTaj Gibson
822LeadsListed-team regular-season wins751
54.4%LeadsListed-team winning percentage49.5%
8Leads50-win team seasons4
3Leads60-win team seasons1
13LeadsPlayoff team seasons11
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Kurt Thomas leads every available measure below.
Kurt ThomasMetricTaj Gibson
11LeadsPlayoff appearances9
96LeadsPlayoff games71
61LeadsTeam playoff wins27
1LeadsFinals appearances0
0Championships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
No recorded measure separates these careers.
Kurt ThomasMetricTaj Gibson
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Kurt ThomasTaj GibsonPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Kurt ThomasNBA seasonTaj Gibson
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Season 8
Season 9
Season 10
Season 11
Season 12
Season 13
Season 14
Season 15
Season 16
Season 17
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.