hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Matt Bonner vs. Monta Ellis: 2015–16 season

hussEyquation2015–16 season · regular-season impact
Regular-season verdict

There is not enough comparable regular-season data to name a leader

Impact comparison

Impact estimate is measured in points per 100 possessions above league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Impact Rate rank is a league place, not a 0–100 score: No. 1 is best.

—Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1
—Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#144
30Games81
206Minutes2,734
2.5PPG13.8Leads
64.7%LeadsTS%50.4%

Season impact is unavailable for at least one player in this scope. hussEyquation does not substitute a different measure or declare a winner.

Matt Bonner: 30 games and 206 minutes. Monta Ellis: 81 games and 2,734 minutes. Playing time matters when judging the whole season; the impact estimate above is a rate, not a season total.

Read turnover rate alongside offensive workload. Offensive usage measures the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on the court—not every touch, pass, or act of playmaking. These rows provide context; they are not extra points added to the ranking.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

2015–16 season · regular-season impacthusseyquation.com/compare/matt-bonner/monta-ellis/2015-16

Behind the estimate

Why the model rates them this way

A verified breakdown of this season’s published estimate is unavailable. We do not substitute another season’s calculation.

What this does not establish: these figures do not prove that either player made his teammates shoot better. A verified teammate-shooting comparison is unavailable for this selected season. A small difference in the estimates is not a decisive basketball distinction.

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · 2015–16 season

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

The impact estimate compares performance while playing, not total contribution over the season. The individual-stat estimate plus the lineup adjustment gives the final estimate.

Impact: Matt Bonner and Monta Ellis
MetricMatt BonnerMonta Ellis
Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable-0.1
Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is bestUnavailable#144

Matt Bonner: verified lineup window unavailable. Monta Ellis: verified lineup window unavailable. The adjustment is not necessarily based on this season alone.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Matt Bonner and Monta Ellis
MetricMatt BonnerMonta Ellis
Games3081
Minutes2062,734

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These figures describe the selected regular seasons. They provide context, not extra points added to the verdict. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Matt Bonner and Monta Ellis
MetricMatt BonnerMonta Ellis
True shooting percentage64.7%Better result for this metric.50.4%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Matt Bonner and Monta Ellis
MetricMatt BonnerMonta Ellis
Field-goal percentage50.9%Better result for this metric.42.7%
Three-point percentage44.1%Better result for this metric.30.9%
Free-throw percentage75.0%78.6%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Matt Bonner and Monta Ellis
MetricMatt BonnerMonta Ellis
Assists per game0.34.7Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Matt Bonner and Monta Ellis
MetricMatt BonnerMonta Ellis
Rebounds per game0.93.3Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Matt Bonner and Monta Ellis
MetricMatt BonnerMonta Ellis
Points per game2.513.8Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

There is not enough comparable regular-season data to name a leader.

Matt BonnerMetricMonta Ellis
Not availableImpact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1
Not availableImpact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#144

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Matt Bonner leads every available measure below.

Matt BonnerMetricMonta Ellis
631LeadsListed-team regular-season wins493
65.2%LeadsListed-team winning percentage47.7%
10Leads50-win team seasons1
3Leads60-win team seasons0
10LeadsPlayoff team seasons6

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Matt Bonner leads every available measure below.

Matt BonnerMetricMonta Ellis
9LeadsPlayoff appearances6
94LeadsPlayoff games38
76LeadsTeam playoff wins12
3LeadsFinals appearances0
2LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Matt BonnerMetricMonta Ellis
Not availableAll-Star0
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA0
Not availableAll-Defense0
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Selected seasons

Box impact

Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.

Matt BonnerMonta Ellis

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

1

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.