hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Maurice Cheeks vs. Rod Strickland: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Maurice Cheeks ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#100LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#156
+4.3Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.7Leads
+3.6Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.8Leads
10.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better15.7
+3,330 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,829 pts
21.6LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better30.8

Career Impact Rank places Maurice Cheeks #100 and Rod Strickland #156. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Rod Strickland had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/maurice-cheeks/rod-strickland/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedMaurice Cheeks14.093 · No. 100Rod Strickland20.233 · No. 156

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Maurice Cheeks

14.093 composite · No. 100 all-time

Maurice Cheeks's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 91981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate10.66750%5.333
Best 5No. 91981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate14.80030%4.440
Best 10No. 91981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate21.60020%4.320

5.333 + 4.440 + 4.320= 14.093

Rod Strickland

20.233 composite · No. 156 all-time

Rod Strickland's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 101994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate15.66750%7.833
Best 5No. 101994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate20.80030%6.240
Best 10No. 101994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 311995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 391996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate30.80020%6.160

7.833 + 6.240 + 6.160= 20.233

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Maurice Cheeks and Rod Strickland
MetricMaurice CheeksRod Strickland
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#100Better result for this metric.#156
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better10.7Better result for this metric.15.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better14.8Better result for this metric.20.8
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better21.6Better result for this metric.30.8
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Maurice Cheeks and Rod Strickland
MetricMaurice CheeksRod Strickland
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#69Better result for this metric.#98
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.3+5.7Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.9+4.2Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.6+3.8Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.1+3.1
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,330 ptsBetter result for this metric.+2,829 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons11

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Maurice Cheeks and Rod Strickland
MetricMaurice CheeksRod Strickland
Games1,1011,094
Minutes34,84533,634

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Maurice Cheeks and Rod Strickland
MetricMaurice CheeksRod Strickland
True shooting percentage57.2%Better result for this metric.51.6%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile58.2%Better result for this metric.52.5%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Maurice Cheeks and Rod Strickland
MetricMaurice CheeksRod Strickland
Field-goal percentage52.3%Better result for this metric.45.4%
Three-point percentage25.5%28.2%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage79.3%Better result for this metric.72.1%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Maurice Cheeks and Rod Strickland
MetricMaurice CheeksRod Strickland
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile29.7%37.9%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game6.77.3Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Maurice Cheeks and Rod Strickland
MetricMaurice CheeksRod Strickland
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.7%16.9%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Maurice Cheeks and Rod Strickland
MetricMaurice CheeksRod Strickland
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.0%7.0%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game2.83.7Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Maurice Cheeks and Rod Strickland
MetricMaurice CheeksRod Strickland
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile3.3%Better result for this metric.2.6%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Maurice Cheeks and Rod Strickland
MetricMaurice CheeksRod Strickland
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.6%Better result for this metric.0.4%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Maurice Cheeks and Rod Strickland
MetricMaurice CheeksRod Strickland
Points per game11.113.2Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Maurice Cheeks ranks higher in career impact.

Maurice CheeksMetricRod Strickland
#100LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#156
+4.3Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.7Leads
+3.6Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.8Leads
+3,330 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,829 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Maurice CheeksMetricRod Strickland
803Listed-team regular-season wins835Leads
61.2%LeadsListed-team winning percentage51.9%
8Leads50-win team seasons7
2Leads60-win team seasons0
14LeadsPlayoff team seasons13

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Maurice Cheeks leads every available measure below.

Maurice CheeksMetricRod Strickland
13LeadsPlayoff appearances11
133LeadsPlayoff games52
74LeadsTeam playoff wins18
3LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Maurice CheeksMetricRod Strickland
4LeadsAll-Star0
0MVP0
0All-NBA1Leads
5LeadsAll-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Maurice CheeksRod StricklandPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.