hussEyquation
Menu

NBA player comparison

Maurice Cheeks vs. Sidney Moncrief: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Sidney Moncrief ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison
#100Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#64Leads
+4.3Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+5.6Leads
+3.6Best 5 average impact+4.6Leads
10.7Best 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better5.7Leads
+3,330 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,719 pts
1Top-10 impact seasons5Leads

Career Impact Rank places Sidney Moncrief #64 and Maurice Cheeks #100. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Maurice Cheeks had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/maurice-cheeks/sidney-moncrief/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedMaurice Cheeks14.093 · No. 100Sidney Moncrief8.853 · No. 64

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Maurice Cheeks

14.093 composite · No. 100 all-time

Maurice Cheeks's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 91981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate10.66750%5.333
Best 5No. 91981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate14.80030%4.440
Best 10No. 91981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 211986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 221987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate21.60020%4.320

5.333 + 4.440 + 4.320= 14.093

Sidney Moncrief

8.853 composite · No. 64 all-time

Sidney Moncrief's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 41982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate5.66750%2.833
Best 5No. 41982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate7.20030%2.160
Best 10No. 41982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 71981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 91984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 121985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 371988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate19.30020%3.860

2.833 + 2.160 + 3.860= 8.853

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Maurice Cheeks and Sidney Moncrief
MetricMaurice CheeksSidney Moncrief
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#100#64Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finish10.75.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finish14.87.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finish21.619.3Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Maurice Cheeks and Sidney Moncrief
MetricMaurice CheeksSidney Moncrief
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#69Better result for this metric.#108
Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+4.3+5.6Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average impact+3.9+4.9Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average impact+3.6+4.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average impact+3.1+3.4Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,330 ptsBetter result for this metric.+2,719 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons01Better result for this metric.
Top-ten impact seasons15Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Maurice Cheeks and Sidney Moncrief
MetricMaurice CheeksSidney Moncrief
Games1,101767
Minutes34,84523,150

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Maurice Cheeks and Sidney Moncrief
MetricMaurice CheeksSidney Moncrief
True shooting percentage57.2%59.1%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile58.2%58.8%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Maurice Cheeks and Sidney Moncrief
MetricMaurice CheeksSidney Moncrief
Field-goal percentage52.3%Better result for this metric.50.2%
Three-point percentage25.5%28.4%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage79.3%83.1%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Maurice Cheeks and Sidney Moncrief
MetricMaurice CheeksSidney Moncrief
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile29.7%Better result for this metric.17.1%
Assists per game6.7Better result for this metric.3.6
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Maurice Cheeks and Sidney Moncrief
MetricMaurice CheeksSidney Moncrief
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.7%13.4%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Maurice Cheeks and Sidney Moncrief
MetricMaurice CheeksSidney Moncrief
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.0%8.6%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game2.84.7Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Maurice Cheeks and Sidney Moncrief
MetricMaurice CheeksSidney Moncrief
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile3.3%Better result for this metric.1.9%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Maurice Cheeks and Sidney Moncrief
MetricMaurice CheeksSidney Moncrief
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.6%0.6%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Maurice Cheeks and Sidney Moncrief
MetricMaurice CheeksSidney Moncrief
Points per game11.115.6Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Sidney Moncrief ranks higher in career impact.

Maurice CheeksMetricSidney Moncrief
#100Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#64Leads
+4.3Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+5.6Leads
+3.6Best 5 average impact+4.6Leads
+3,330 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,719 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Maurice CheeksMetricSidney Moncrief
803LeadsListed-team regular-season wins565
61.2%Listed-team winning percentage62.6%Leads
8Leads50-win team seasons7
2Leads60-win team seasons1
14LeadsPlayoff team seasons11

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Maurice Cheeks leads every available measure below.

Maurice CheeksMetricSidney Moncrief
13LeadsPlayoff appearances11
133LeadsPlayoff games93
74LeadsTeam playoff wins44
3LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Sidney Moncrief leads every available measure below.

Maurice CheeksMetricSidney Moncrief
4All-Star5Leads
0MVP0
0All-NBA5Leads
5All-Defense5
0DPOY2Leads
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Maurice CheeksSidney MoncriefPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.