
Michael Jordan
1984–85 to 2002–03
15 seasons · 1984–85 to 2002–03NBA player comparison
Their games invite a direct stylistic comparison, but the model focuses on results: peak impact, season-by-season league finish, sustained excellence, and total career value.

1984–85 to 2002–03
15 seasons · 1984–85 to 2002–03
1996–97 to 2015–16
20 seasons · 1996–97 to 2015–16The story: Michael Jordan ranks higher because his best regular seasons were stronger. Points, rebounds, and assists tell only part of the story. hussEyquation estimates how much a player helped his team while he was on the court. Michael Jordan's best season was estimated at +13.6 points per 100 possessions above league average. Kobe Bryant's best season was +8.0. Across their best three, five, and ten seasons, Michael Jordan's average league places were 1.0, 1.0, and 1.2. Kobe Bryant's were 3.7, 4.2, and 6.9. A place closer to No. 1 is better.
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It looks at where each player ranked in his best three, five, and ten seasons, giving the most weight to his very best years. Playoff results, awards, and championships do not affect it.
Michael Jordan ranks higher because his best regular seasons were stronger. Points, rebounds, and assists tell only part of the story. hussEyquation estimates how much a player helped his team while he was on the court. Michael Jordan's best season was estimated at +13.6 points per 100 possessions above league average. Kobe Bryant's best season was +8.0. Across their best three, five, and ten seasons, Michael Jordan's average league places were 1.0, 1.0, and 1.2. Kobe Bryant's were 3.7, 4.2, and 6.9. A place closer to No. 1 is better.
Full comparison
Category leaders are highlighted. Only hussEyquation measures determine the verdict; awards remain context.
Model inputs
Average input rates across each player's ten best impact seasons.
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results.
Model results
Era-centered impact, sustained excellence and career value.
Box score
Scoring, efficiency and all-around production.
Résumé
Context only; these are not model inputs.
Career shape
Career mode aligns season one with season one.