The story: Kevin Garnett produced 3 No. 1 impact seasons and 10 top-five seasons; Tim Duncan produced 0 and 4. Across their best three, five and ten seasons, their average league ranks were 1.0, 1.4 and 2.9 versus 3.3, 4.2 and 5.7. Lower is better.
This is regular-season impact, not a points-per-game, awards or championships ranking.
Share this comparisonDownload the card as a 1200 × 630 image.
Copy table
Why this verdict
Kevin Garnett produced 3 No. 1 impact seasons and 10 top-five seasons; Tim Duncan produced 0 and 4. Across their best three, five and ten seasons, their average league ranks were 1.0, 1.4 and 2.9 versus 3.3, 4.2 and 5.7. Lower is better.
Full comparison
All the numbers
Category leaders are highlighted. Only hussEyquation measures determine the verdict; awards remain context.