hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Sam Cassell vs. Walter Davis: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Walter Davis ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#255Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#139Leads
+4.2Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.3Leads
+3.0Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.2Leads
26.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better10.3Leads
+2,128 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,362 ptsLeads
1Top-10 impact seasons2Leads

Career Impact Rank places Walter Davis #139 and Sam Cassell #255. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/sam-cassell/walter-davis/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedSam Cassell33.027 · No. 255Walter Davis18.227 · No. 139

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Sam Cassell

33.027 composite · No. 255 all-time

Sam Cassell's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 102003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 342002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate26.33350%13.167
Best 5No. 102003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 342002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 352001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate31.40030%9.420
Best 10No. 102003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 342002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 352001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 652005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 722000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 722004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1001994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate52.20020%10.440

13.167 + 9.420 + 10.440= 33.027

Walter Davis

18.227 composite · No. 139 all-time

Walter Davis's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 41978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate10.33350%5.167
Best 5No. 41978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate18.60030%5.580
Best 10No. 41978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 101977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 171979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate37.40020%7.480

5.167 + 5.580 + 7.480= 18.227

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Sam Cassell and Walter Davis
MetricSam CassellWalter Davis
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#255#139Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better26.310.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better31.418.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better52.237.4Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Sam Cassell and Walter Davis
MetricSam CassellWalter Davis
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#164#137Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.2+4.3Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.4+3.9Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.0+3.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.1+2.2Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,128 pts+2,362 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons01Better result for this metric.
Top-ten impact seasons12Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Sam Cassell and Walter Davis
MetricSam CassellWalter Davis
Games9931,033
Minutes29,81228,859

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Sam Cassell and Walter Davis
MetricSam CassellWalter Davis
True shooting percentage54.4%55.8%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile54.6%56.6%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Sam Cassell and Walter Davis
MetricSam CassellWalter Davis
Field-goal percentage45.4%51.1%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage33.1%Better result for this metric.27.2%
Free-throw percentage86.1%Better result for this metric.85.1%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Sam Cassell and Walter Davis
MetricSam CassellWalter Davis
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile35.2%Better result for this metric.21.6%
Assists per game6.0Better result for this metric.3.8
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Sam Cassell and Walter Davis
MetricSam CassellWalter Davis
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.4%13.0%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Sam Cassell and Walter Davis
MetricSam CassellWalter Davis
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.2%Better result for this metric.5.9%
Rebounds per game3.2Better result for this metric.3.0

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Sam Cassell and Walter Davis
MetricSam CassellWalter Davis
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.9%2.0%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Sam Cassell and Walter Davis
MetricSam CassellWalter Davis
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.5%Better result for this metric.0.3%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Sam Cassell and Walter Davis
MetricSam CassellWalter Davis
Points per game15.718.9Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Walter Davis ranks higher in career impact.

Sam CassellMetricWalter Davis
#255Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#139Leads
+4.2Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.3Leads
+3.0Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.2Leads
+2,128 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,362 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Sam CassellMetricWalter Davis
785LeadsListed-team regular-season wins677
52.5%LeadsListed-team winning percentage51.6%
450-win team seasons5Leads
160-win team seasons1
12LeadsPlayoff team seasons11

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Sam Cassell leads every available measure below.

Sam CassellMetricWalter Davis
11LeadsPlayoff appearances10
136LeadsPlayoff games78
80LeadsTeam playoff wins36
3LeadsFinals appearances0
3LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Walter Davis leads every available measure below.

Sam CassellMetricWalter Davis
1All-Star6Leads
0MVP0
1All-NBA2Leads
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Sam CassellWalter DavisPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.